Cool story bro

Lol, I tried repeatedly upthread to get you to engage constructively and you weren't interested, so don't waste your time trying to feign good faith for a very obvious contrived pretext.

Lmao yes that should've been an obvious clue.

The commitment to this bit is really getting quite sad now.

Yeah, even if you were being honest, the anecdotal claims of a random anonymous Bluesky account with no pfp aren't evidence of much at all.

I've followed plenty online. Inevitably they either end up being base reactionary bigots after all, are comfortable with those who are, or fall by the wayside.

"All the major players are left wing feminists."

OK, now you're just obviously straight-up lying and you know it.

And there are Lexiters who claimed to believe that Brexit would be a step to socialist revolution. Doesn't make it not obviously the case that Brexit as it has actually happened has been a right-wing reactionary project, and any Lexiters claiming otherwise are bullshitting.

It's a bit like saying the existence of "Blacks for Trump" or suchlike somehow disproves the claim that Trump voters, as a whole, are racist white guys.

"the prominence of left wing feminists in the trans debate"

Lmao. Again, pull the other one.

The appropriate comparable analogy would be if there was only one NHS abortion clinic in England, and there were suddenly "concerns" about it being pushed by ideological anti-choice groups. And in that context, yes, a woman who'd had good abortion care there would be a very appropriate inclusion!

Yeah, there's more than one maternity care unit in the country, and there isn't a large number of people ideologically opposed to the whole concept of maternity care.

And pull the other one. Anti-trans attitudes are mostly those of conservative sexist men, Trans-friendly ones mostly those of feminist women. Trying to redwash transphobia won't work here, try an easier mark.

I tried engaging with you for quite a while above. I didn't even explicitly accuse you if bigotry, I gave a description of some of your actions that people would generally see as bigoted. That you know it's accurate is apparent from the fact that you're attacking the conclusion, not the premise.

It's so revealing how you cycle out the feigned pretexts entirely unprompted.

People who don't have a bigoted obsession with a particular group generally don't set up social media accounts almost totally dedicated to antipathy towards that group, or regularly share content from people who use crude slurs for that group.

Well, because that's what you've been doing all thread, and because your feed makes pretty obvious your obsession with and antipathy to trans people.

What you actually did though is started with an opinion and then retrofitted what to count as "evidence" based on that.

My big takeaway from this is that a lot of people made right decisions for very wrong reasons.

Lol. "It's needed to provide the conclusion that I already decided I want to reach."