The second chart looks at the comparative Fund balances and POMV draws of the PFC v. ...
3/4
The second chart looks at the comparative Fund balances and POMV draws of the PFC v. ...
3/4
As the chart shows, for FY26, the PFC's return trails the S&P 500 ETF as well as its own passive & performance benchmarks ....
2/4
As the chart shows, for FY26, the PFC's return trails the S&P 500 ETF as well as its own passive & performance benchmarks ....
2/4
* 5-yr: S&P 13.22% v PFC 9.54%
* 3-yr: S&P 18.67% v PFC 10.41%
* 1-yr: S&P 12.93% v PFC 10.10%
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$82mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $3 (-$103mil)
> FY28-32 ⬆️ $1 (avg annual +$36mil)
#akleg
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$82mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $3 (-$103mil)
> FY28-32 ⬆️ $1 (avg annual +$36mil)
#akleg
CA: 8.5 (46%)
WA: 6.0 (42%)
AK: 1.0 (9%)
HI: 0.0 (2%)
Asia: 0.0 (1%)
Significant during the month: 1 HIL in maint.
CA: 8.5 (46%)
WA: 6.0 (42%)
AK: 1.0 (9%)
HI: 0.0 (2%)
Asia: 0.0 (1%)
Significant during the month: 1 HIL in maint.
YTD (thru Aug), Alaska running ⬆️ 1.2% v. 2019 USWC mkt share (20.1% v 18.9%), but due to lower demand, vols ⬇️ 38kbd (410kbd). US sources 40% of total USWC supplies.
YTD (thru Aug), Alaska running ⬆️ 1.2% v. 2019 USWC mkt share (20.1% v 18.9%), but due to lower demand, vols ⬇️ 38kbd (410kbd). US sources 40% of total USWC supplies.
* 5-yr: S&P 13.59% v PFC 9.54%
* 3-yr: S&P 18.85% v PFC 10.41%
* 1-yr: S&P 13.54% v PFC 10.10%
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$55mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $4 (-$133mil)
> FY28-32 even (avg annual $0mil)
#akleg
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$55mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $4 (-$133mil)
> FY28-32 even (avg annual $0mil)
#akleg
1/2
1/2
Effective Fed funds rate: 3.88%
US Treas Bond yields --
**10-Yr: 4.00%**
20-Yr: 4.60%
30-Yr: 4.64%
4/end
Effective Fed funds rate: 3.88%
US Treas Bond yields --
**10-Yr: 4.00%**
20-Yr: 4.60%
30-Yr: 4.64%
4/end
Current: 3.02% (Sept)
10yr Avg: 2.23%
Next 5yrs: 2.29%
5 yrs Beyond That: 2.17%
3/4
Current: 3.02% (Sept)
10yr Avg: 2.23%
Next 5yrs: 2.29%
5 yrs Beyond That: 2.17%
3/4
PCE: up 50.0% (5.0%/yr)
CPI: up 24.6% (2.5%/yr)
2/4
PCE: up 50.0% (5.0%/yr)
CPI: up 24.6% (2.5%/yr)
2/4
* Deliveries month to date: 15.5
* Not in ANS service: 1 (HIL maint.)
* Asia: 0
* USWC: 9 (5 CP, 2 HIL, 2 XOM) in runs
* Deliveries month to date: 15.5
* Not in ANS service: 1 (HIL maint.)
* Asia: 0
* USWC: 9 (5 CP, 2 HIL, 2 XOM) in runs
* 5-yr: S&P 13.59% v PFC 9.54%
* 3-yr: S&P 18.85% v PFC 10.41%
* 1-yr: S&P 13.54% v PFC 10.10%
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$46mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $4 (-$133mil)
> FY28-32 even (avg annual $0mil)
#akleg
> FY26 ⬆️ $1 (+$46mil UGF)
> FY27 ⬇️ $4 (-$133mil)
> FY28-32 even (avg annual $0mil)
#akleg
2/end
2/end
1/2
1/2
As the charts demonstrate, the first approach spreads the burden proportionately among all #AKfams. The second, third & fourth are increasingly regressive ...
5/6
As the charts demonstrate, the first approach spreads the burden proportionately among all #AKfams. The second, third & fourth are increasingly regressive ...
5/6
* Restructuring the PFD as POMV 25/75, w/ the additional deficit (above POMV 25/75) filled through a flat tax,
4/6
* Restructuring the PFD as POMV 25/75, w/ the additional deficit (above POMV 25/75) filled through a flat tax,
4/6
𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙, we then look at four ways of closing the deficit.
* Retaining the current law PFD and using a flat tax to close the deficit instead,
3/6
𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙, we then look at four ways of closing the deficit.
* Retaining the current law PFD and using a flat tax to close the deficit instead,
3/6