𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
@ajohmss1956.bsky.social
Scots-Canadian retired from the entertainment industry.
Official ANTIFA snack coordinator.
Movie buff and soundtrack aficionado.
Official ANTIFA snack coordinator.
Movie buff and soundtrack aficionado.
Pinned
@moderation.bsky.app
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
📌 Thank you , Jon Stewart ‼️
For articulating , what most
are feeling right now 💯
🎯🎯 👇🏾 🐥 👇🏻 🎯🎯
For articulating , what most
are feeling right now 💯
🎯🎯 👇🏾 🐥 👇🏻 🎯🎯
November 11, 2025 at 8:23 AM
📌 Thank you , Jon Stewart ‼️
For articulating , what most
are feeling right now 💯
🎯🎯 👇🏾 🐥 👇🏻 🎯🎯
For articulating , what most
are feeling right now 💯
🎯🎯 👇🏾 🐥 👇🏻 🎯🎯
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
A yawn is a silent scream for COFFEE.
November 11, 2025 at 8:31 AM
A yawn is a silent scream for COFFEE.
Never pictured Lawrence O'Donnell as the head cheerleader for the Chuck Schumer fan club.
November 11, 2025 at 3:12 AM
Never pictured Lawrence O'Donnell as the head cheerleader for the Chuck Schumer fan club.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
Joyce Carol Oates said what everyone’s been thinking and did it with elegance.
November 11, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Joyce Carol Oates said what everyone’s been thinking and did it with elegance.
Laying in bed and eating ice cream on a snowy Monday afternoon.
This is the life.
This is the life.
November 10, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Laying in bed and eating ice cream on a snowy Monday afternoon.
This is the life.
This is the life.
In the matter of Donald tRUmp.
November 10, 2025 at 6:32 PM
In the matter of Donald tRUmp.
Anyone else think of that old cereal 'Honeycomb'?
November 10, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Anyone else think of that old cereal 'Honeycomb'?
As I once told Pope Benedict during our luncheon together ... get stuffed you fat bastard.
November 10, 2025 at 3:12 PM
As I once told Pope Benedict during our luncheon together ... get stuffed you fat bastard.
THIS Steve Baker???
November 10, 2025 at 3:11 PM
THIS Steve Baker???
Jousne jlkeilks scdrrllsk.
Mndspplg ressolsin renenslsddf.
Mndspplg ressolsin renenslsddf.
November 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Jousne jlkeilks scdrrllsk.
Mndspplg ressolsin renenslsddf.
Mndspplg ressolsin renenslsddf.
Blah blah blah.
Gurgle.
Blah blah?
Gurgle, gurgle, snort!
Gurgle.
Blah blah?
Gurgle, gurgle, snort!
November 10, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Blah blah blah.
Gurgle.
Blah blah?
Gurgle, gurgle, snort!
Gurgle.
Blah blah?
Gurgle, gurgle, snort!
Chuck Schumer makes Jerry Nadler look like a fighter.
November 10, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Chuck Schumer makes Jerry Nadler look like a fighter.
Just a reminder that basketball was meant to be played by people of average height.
November 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM
Just a reminder that basketball was meant to be played by people of average height.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
Re: Chuck Schumer.
I could see it making sense if there was some sort of strategy involved. If, by capitulating, it would necessitate a recall of the house and the swearing in of the new AZ member which could lead to a vote on the Epstein files.
But I don't see this anywhere.
I could see it making sense if there was some sort of strategy involved. If, by capitulating, it would necessitate a recall of the house and the swearing in of the new AZ member which could lead to a vote on the Epstein files.
But I don't see this anywhere.
November 10, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Re: Chuck Schumer.
I could see it making sense if there was some sort of strategy involved. If, by capitulating, it would necessitate a recall of the house and the swearing in of the new AZ member which could lead to a vote on the Epstein files.
But I don't see this anywhere.
I could see it making sense if there was some sort of strategy involved. If, by capitulating, it would necessitate a recall of the house and the swearing in of the new AZ member which could lead to a vote on the Epstein files.
But I don't see this anywhere.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
So Democrats will now be legitimizing the republican narrative that the shutdown was the fault of Democrats all along?
Nothing republicans do is in good faith.
What will it take for Democrats to learn this?
Nothing republicans do is in good faith.
What will it take for Democrats to learn this?
November 10, 2025 at 2:33 AM
So Democrats will now be legitimizing the republican narrative that the shutdown was the fault of Democrats all along?
Nothing republicans do is in good faith.
What will it take for Democrats to learn this?
Nothing republicans do is in good faith.
What will it take for Democrats to learn this?
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
Listening to senators Shaheen, Hassan, King and Kain and all I can hear is Neville Chamberlain.
November 10, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Listening to senators Shaheen, Hassan, King and Kain and all I can hear is Neville Chamberlain.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
You'd have to be a senate Democrat to believe that agreements will be honored by someone who has made a career of dishonoring agreements.
November 10, 2025 at 2:56 AM
You'd have to be a senate Democrat to believe that agreements will be honored by someone who has made a career of dishonoring agreements.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
8 Democratic senators just mortgaged their homes to make a down payment on the Brooklyn Bridge.
November 10, 2025 at 3:25 AM
8 Democratic senators just mortgaged their homes to make a down payment on the Brooklyn Bridge.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
Those defending Chuck Schumer are the same people who defended Merrick Garland.
November 10, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Those defending Chuck Schumer are the same people who defended Merrick Garland.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
Since my posts don't really go anywhere I'm just gonna put this out there.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
November 10, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Since my posts don't really go anywhere I'm just gonna put this out there.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
@moderation.bsky.app
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
September 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM
@moderation.bsky.app
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
I was shadowbanned on twitter for over 3 years due to right-wing reporting campaigns.
I saw my monthly impressions drop from 1.5 million to less than 30k almost overnight.
I know what shadowbanning looks and feels like.
So why am I feeling it here?
Reposted by 𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙈𝙘𝙆𝙞𝙣𝙡𝙚𝙮
People are just now finding out that Chuck Schumer, whose closest advisor on major issues is an imaginary family he made up in his childhood (yes, really), might not be the best choice to lead in times like these
From the johnoliver community on Reddit: John Oliver breaks down how Chuck Schumer has based his entire political strategy on an entirely fictional Long Island couple named Joe and Eileen Bailey
Explore this post and more from the johnoliver community
www.reddit.com
November 10, 2025 at 4:51 AM
People are just now finding out that Chuck Schumer, whose closest advisor on major issues is an imaginary family he made up in his childhood (yes, really), might not be the best choice to lead in times like these
Since my posts don't really go anywhere I'm just gonna put this out there.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
November 10, 2025 at 4:07 AM
Since my posts don't really go anywhere I'm just gonna put this out there.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
The reasons you're mad at Chuck Schumer are the same reasons you should have been mad at Joe Biden.
Both are old-school traditionalists who are utterly lost in today's politics.
As it stands now your two political options are fascism and capitulation to fascism.
The two party system is incompatible with democracy.
We must change our electoral system to restore democracy.
We must change our electoral system to restore democracy.
November 10, 2025 at 3:36 AM
As it stands now your two political options are fascism and capitulation to fascism.
Those defending Chuck Schumer are the same people who defended Merrick Garland.
November 10, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Those defending Chuck Schumer are the same people who defended Merrick Garland.