Agronox
@agronox.bsky.social
Neat, thanks for the rec.
November 14, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Neat, thanks for the rec.
I say again, the New York Times must be destroyed
November 14, 2025 at 5:58 PM
I say again, the New York Times must be destroyed
Yeah, they should do that.
November 14, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Yeah, they should do that.
Yeah. And it is *very clearly* against site-wide rules
November 14, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Yeah. And it is *very clearly* against site-wide rules
When did we become technical analysts
November 14, 2025 at 2:39 PM
When did we become technical analysts
I do hope this formulation catches on
November 13, 2025 at 7:46 PM
I do hope this formulation catches on
lol it's always a ground lease isn't it
"wow this condo is only $220,000 when the comps are $830k"
"wow this condo is only $220,000 when the comps are $830k"
November 13, 2025 at 7:07 PM
lol it's always a ground lease isn't it
"wow this condo is only $220,000 when the comps are $830k"
"wow this condo is only $220,000 when the comps are $830k"
I swear to god they're going to try putting lead back in the gas before this is all over
November 13, 2025 at 2:43 AM
I swear to god they're going to try putting lead back in the gas before this is all over
Imagine, caving to protect a filibuster that THEY REFUSE TO USE
November 12, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Imagine, caving to protect a filibuster that THEY REFUSE TO USE
I say again, the New York Times must be destroyed.
November 12, 2025 at 8:33 PM
I say again, the New York Times must be destroyed.
How are they so bad at this
November 11, 2025 at 8:15 PM
How are they so bad at this
It's cope. Go back 40 days, ask people what winning would look like, and no one would say the current situation is it.
November 11, 2025 at 4:05 PM
It's cope. Go back 40 days, ask people what winning would look like, and no one would say the current situation is it.
I am not sure "We decided that rather than fighting we'd tell Republicans they can get whatever they want by threatening SNAP" is a particularly good message either
November 11, 2025 at 3:02 PM
I am not sure "We decided that rather than fighting we'd tell Republicans they can get whatever they want by threatening SNAP" is a particularly good message either
Sorry Senator. No much good faith assumptions when you keep Schumer in the leadership chair.
November 10, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Sorry Senator. No much good faith assumptions when you keep Schumer in the leadership chair.
Reposted by Agronox
You've got your flagrant cowardice, your too-clever-by-half DC-brained tactical maneuvering that fools no one but impresses reporters, your fealty to bipartisanship in an era when your opponents are dumping diarrhea on your head, your insane belief in the power of symbolic votes ... everything.
November 10, 2025 at 8:15 PM
You've got your flagrant cowardice, your too-clever-by-half DC-brained tactical maneuvering that fools no one but impresses reporters, your fealty to bipartisanship in an era when your opponents are dumping diarrhea on your head, your insane belief in the power of symbolic votes ... everything.
Not an ounce of courage :(
November 10, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Not an ounce of courage :(
