Agronox
@agronox.bsky.social
Yeah. And it is *very clearly* against site-wide rules
November 14, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Yeah. And it is *very clearly* against site-wide rules
I mean it's pretty clearly against bluesky's rules, even if the target is odious
November 14, 2025 at 2:50 PM
I mean it's pretty clearly against bluesky's rules, even if the target is odious
I do hope this formulation catches on
November 13, 2025 at 7:46 PM
I do hope this formulation catches on
As seen here at the end of the line!
November 3, 2025 at 5:16 PM
As seen here at the end of the line!
Also, with the food thing, we aren't TOO far from 2022 treats discourse here, back in 1937...
November 2, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Also, with the food thing, we aren't TOO far from 2022 treats discourse here, back in 1937...
Holy lol... well I am a lefty, and I wear this to the gym (it was a gift, no idea where it came from
September 11, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Holy lol... well I am a lefty, and I wear this to the gym (it was a gift, no idea where it came from
Damn this Economist cover goes hard
September 4, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Damn this Economist cover goes hard
Just an aside, but I was recently thumbing through some old magazines and spotted this essay, which noted that "Everyone wants Chinese consumers to spend more. So why don't they?"
It was published on Dec. 7, 2009.
It was published on Dec. 7, 2009.
August 28, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Just an aside, but I was recently thumbing through some old magazines and spotted this essay, which noted that "Everyone wants Chinese consumers to spend more. So why don't they?"
It was published on Dec. 7, 2009.
It was published on Dec. 7, 2009.
Making this required reading at the camps
August 6, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Making this required reading at the camps
Yeah, but then you get to the end and, despite the disclaimer, want to just throw it in the trash
August 3, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Yeah, but then you get to the end and, despite the disclaimer, want to just throw it in the trash
It got me curious. Here's similar language from a recent investopedia article.
www.investopedia.com/that-7-year-...
www.investopedia.com/that-7-year-...
July 28, 2025 at 12:34 PM
It got me curious. Here's similar language from a recent investopedia article.
www.investopedia.com/that-7-year-...
www.investopedia.com/that-7-year-...
Reposting without jpeg artifacts etc.
July 26, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Reposting without jpeg artifacts etc.
The "evidence" you point to is based on one giant problem, see attached
July 25, 2025 at 12:31 PM
The "evidence" you point to is based on one giant problem, see attached
I cannot believe they were able to sell two billion dollars worth of this shit
July 24, 2025 at 5:54 PM
I cannot believe they were able to sell two billion dollars worth of this shit
I feel like I'm learning a lot
July 17, 2025 at 1:29 AM
I feel like I'm learning a lot
I'd make a slight change to this.
July 10, 2025 at 12:43 PM
I'd make a slight change to this.