I speak as an ex-Chief Legal Officer. Investigations exist to exonerate the entity that paid for them.

“Here’s the AI written copyright analysis.”

Because “we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing” lacked authenticity I guess?

The loss of VC-subsidized burrito taxis broke these people’s brains.

My $40 Wyze cam has saved thousands of dollars in headaches for easy returns when a UPS driver lobs a package onto my porch.

Also takes cute videos of the neighborhood alley cats.

I play it with my friends, I think it is fun, and it is still a scam. It’s great that more content is starting to arrive, but it’s nothing close to what was promised years ago when I bought in.

My petrostate reaping: haha fuck yeah!!!

My petrostate sowing: Well this fucking sucks.

(But genuinely a humanitarian crisis that will receive significantly less attention and support because of the regime these people are stuck under.)

Without inserting latin how can I let the court know that I'm a very smart little boy that deserves to bill $650 per hour?

would it even matter how it is dismissed? The SOL has run and DOJ is left with "Your honor we messed up historically bad, please let that count for tolling purposes?"

Doesn’t tool use require the user to orient, target, or place the tool?

The shorthand explanation for “civil rights were not won long ago, it is an incredibly recent phenomenon” that my professor used is “Ruby Bridges has an Instagram.”