Read the article ‘Mushroom bodies tiny regulates Sidekick localization to tricellular adherens junctions’ here: doi.org/10.1242/dev....

Congratulations!
So Sunday notifications are good. Nice!
My experience is that Friday notifications just before WE or holidays are bad, really bad...

BTW, same goes for grant reviews...

Shame on the reviewers to be that lazy and disrespectful. I had similar suspicion with another publisher. Some claims of the reviewers were completely wrong. Discussed with editors about the issues without actually calling them AI generated. Is there a way to prove it was AI generated?

But it is a fraction of the price, and extremely robust (ours is a shared equipment for the institute).

My point is it is great to count objects and have a pretty picture with less background and blur (even though confocal remains way better), but I would be extremely cautious for intensity quantification.

We use it daily on Drosophila tissues. It gives pretty images, but it remains epifluorescence (more bleed through) and one must remain extremely careful with the "levels" seen on the screen.

Bravo!

Great ressource!

That is a tough one to beat... But sometimes it is better these obviously bitter reviews that can be dismissed with the editors (once you have let the anger pass), than those who want to kill your paper by asking an endless list of unfeasible experiments (to which editors rarely, hum never, say no)

Congratulations!

At the end of a seminar part of an interview process, after 15 minutes of question and a good exchange waiting to be last to talk: "What you propose is exactly what not to do..."