Fredrick Blossom
@adeseo.bsky.social
Dropout, Marvel, Doctor Who, Leftist Politics
This shit pisses me off.
“You’re paying extra in taxes for us to develop medicine, and therefore you also have to pay more for the medicine you helped create. This is why you shouldn’t be mad at the corporations, be mad at your leaders for not generating MORE revenue for us from other countries.”
“You’re paying extra in taxes for us to develop medicine, and therefore you also have to pay more for the medicine you helped create. This is why you shouldn’t be mad at the corporations, be mad at your leaders for not generating MORE revenue for us from other countries.”
August 18, 2025 at 2:11 PM
This shit pisses me off.
“You’re paying extra in taxes for us to develop medicine, and therefore you also have to pay more for the medicine you helped create. This is why you shouldn’t be mad at the corporations, be mad at your leaders for not generating MORE revenue for us from other countries.”
“You’re paying extra in taxes for us to develop medicine, and therefore you also have to pay more for the medicine you helped create. This is why you shouldn’t be mad at the corporations, be mad at your leaders for not generating MORE revenue for us from other countries.”
It’s awful but it’s not nearly that imposing, this is fake. This is where the ballroom will be
August 2, 2025 at 3:02 AM
It’s awful but it’s not nearly that imposing, this is fake. This is where the ballroom will be
The article that “hasn’t articulated” links to in the above screenshot has this banger of a line
June 12, 2025 at 1:35 AM
The article that “hasn’t articulated” links to in the above screenshot has this banger of a line
They love to throw in little jabs like this. It’s on his website, @politico.com . Such a lazy, overplayed tactic to convince everyone nothing can ever fundamentally change.
June 12, 2025 at 1:24 AM
They love to throw in little jabs like this. It’s on his website, @politico.com . Such a lazy, overplayed tactic to convince everyone nothing can ever fundamentally change.
Interesting that the OTHER definition of corruption is what YOU’RE doing to the first definition.
May 12, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Interesting that the OTHER definition of corruption is what YOU’RE doing to the first definition.
@samfromwendover.bsky.social and @adamchase.bsky.social , you’re both wrong. There are 15 scenarios. @thewheatgerm.bsky.social is the only right one for recognizing that this was stupid (but not stupid enough that I WASN’T gonna make a flowchart)
February 27, 2025 at 7:30 PM
@samfromwendover.bsky.social and @adamchase.bsky.social , you’re both wrong. There are 15 scenarios. @thewheatgerm.bsky.social is the only right one for recognizing that this was stupid (but not stupid enough that I WASN’T gonna make a flowchart)