Aaron Greenspan
@aarongreenspan.com
"Fueled by a litany of largely unintelligible and random grievances"
—Elon Musk's Lawyers
"Écrasez l'infâme" —Voltaire
http://www.aarongreenspan.com
—Elon Musk's Lawyers
"Écrasez l'infâme" —Voltaire
http://www.aarongreenspan.com
Reposted by Aaron Greenspan
NYT editors put "Claudine Gay" in "top 5 featured on the New York Times homepage Dec 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25"
While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and his chief of staff's "tyrant" warning on 12
Christopher Rufo openly bragged about the plans:
While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and his chief of staff's "tyrant" warning on 12
Christopher Rufo openly bragged about the plans:
Chris Rufo "a total product of right-wing affirmative action and you literally would never have heard of him if he was a liberal"
bsky.app/profile/chri...
NYT front page coverage all the time!
By powerful, mediocre editors who push "meritocracy" narrative yet hired each other with legacy privilege
bsky.app/profile/chri...
NYT front page coverage all the time!
By powerful, mediocre editors who push "meritocracy" narrative yet hired each other with legacy privilege
November 13, 2025 at 12:18 AM
NYT editors put "Claudine Gay" in "top 5 featured on the New York Times homepage Dec 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 22, 25"
While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and his chief of staff's "tyrant" warning on 12
Christopher Rufo openly bragged about the plans:
While they put Trump calling for Constitution's "termination" on page 15 and his chief of staff's "tyrant" warning on 12
Christopher Rufo openly bragged about the plans:
He claims he's won about once a week and yes, in the past, he has said that he's using Grok as his lawyer.
November 11, 2025 at 6:31 AM
He claims he's won about once a week and yes, in the past, he has said that he's using Grok as his lawyer.
I should also mention that the Clerk of Court of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (not the judge) did unfortunately rule that I owe $405.00 in costs. I think that's a clear error, so I'm contesting it. www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...
PlainSite :: Greenspan v. Musk et al, California Northern District Court Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC Document 175: Review of Taxation of Costs
MOTION for Review of Taxation of Costs filed by Aaron Jacob Greenspan. Motion Hearing set for 12/19/2025 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 11/24/2025. Replies due by 12/1/2025. (Attachments...
www.plainsite.org
November 11, 2025 at 5:48 AM
I should also mention that the Clerk of Court of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (not the judge) did unfortunately rule that I owe $405.00 in costs. I think that's a clear error, so I'm contesting it. www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...
If you're interested in diving into that procedural thicket, you can get a sense of what's up here: www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...
PlainSite :: Greenspan v. Musk et al, California Northern District Court Case No. 3:24-cv-04647-MMC Document 177: Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Withdraw Order to Show Cause and Grant Leave to File Motion for FRCP 11 Sanctions Against Defendant Omar Qazi re [136] Order,, Terminate Motions, filed by Aaron Jacob Greenspan. Responses due by 11/14/2025. (Attachments: # (1) Decl...
www.plainsite.org
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 AM
If you're interested in diving into that procedural thicket, you can get a sense of what's up here: www.plainsite.org/dockets/down...
The thing is, it's a Tentative Ruling, and there are a lot of really fundamental issues with it, so there's still a low probability I could change the judge's mind. We'll see.
Meanwhile, Omar has lodged his own anti-SLAPP motion. And it's getting complicated because he keeps lying.
Meanwhile, Omar has lodged his own anti-SLAPP motion. And it's getting complicated because he keeps lying.
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 AM
The thing is, it's a Tentative Ruling, and there are a lot of really fundamental issues with it, so there's still a low probability I could change the judge's mind. We'll see.
Meanwhile, Omar has lodged his own anti-SLAPP motion. And it's getting complicated because he keeps lying.
Meanwhile, Omar has lodged his own anti-SLAPP motion. And it's getting complicated because he keeps lying.
Now for the bad news. Elon's anti-SLAPP motion is being heard Wednesday in Superior Court in San Francisco, and since tomorrow is a court holiday, the Tentative Ruling came out today. It's copied and pasted—or AI-generated maybe—from Elon's briefs. So that's a drag.
Could I owe a lot? Yes.
Could I owe a lot? Yes.
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Now for the bad news. Elon's anti-SLAPP motion is being heard Wednesday in Superior Court in San Francisco, and since tomorrow is a court holiday, the Tentative Ruling came out today. It's copied and pasted—or AI-generated maybe—from Elon's briefs. So that's a drag.
Could I owe a lot? Yes.
Could I owe a lot? Yes.
It goes without saying I am glad that Judge Chesney ruled the way she did. I have some thoughts about the details of her ruling, but I'll save those for Season 2 of BROKEN. (Start with Season 1 now to get up to speed!)
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 AM
It goes without saying I am glad that Judge Chesney ruled the way she did. I have some thoughts about the details of her ruling, but I'll save those for Season 2 of BROKEN. (Start with Season 1 now to get up to speed!)
First, the omission.
Today was one of those good news, bad news kind of days.
The good news is that United States District Judge Maxine M. Chesney decided that I owe nothing to Elon Musk for events in federal court. He filed for sanctions and lost.
Elon asked the court to make me pay $63,464.40.
Today was one of those good news, bad news kind of days.
The good news is that United States District Judge Maxine M. Chesney decided that I owe nothing to Elon Musk for events in federal court. He filed for sanctions and lost.
Elon asked the court to make me pay $63,464.40.
November 11, 2025 at 5:46 AM
First, the omission.
Today was one of those good news, bad news kind of days.
The good news is that United States District Judge Maxine M. Chesney decided that I owe nothing to Elon Musk for events in federal court. He filed for sanctions and lost.
Elon asked the court to make me pay $63,464.40.
Today was one of those good news, bad news kind of days.
The good news is that United States District Judge Maxine M. Chesney decided that I owe nothing to Elon Musk for events in federal court. He filed for sanctions and lost.
Elon asked the court to make me pay $63,464.40.