It was a good one. Definitely worth a thank you and then some. ❤️

Every time these kind of articles comes up.

Reminder that Condé Nast the parent company of the New Yorker has a deal with FOR PROFIT COMPANY OpenAI.

Will it be recorded?

Besides odd misspellings like "Analyzemts" and "scalubility".

The skills and tools seems way off for the different types. 😅

Ah, this looks like such a good talk. The second slide. 👌

Oh, so do I."Internet of Bugs" is a great channel hence why I linked to it regarding this subject.

The initial plea was regarding Hank Green's latest segments on A(G)I on his own channel and SciShow.

Oh the internet of Bugs is a great channel. This was regarding Hank Green's latest segments on generative AI.

POV female character... 🤔

Earth politics, please.

I know about Anil Dash, but he didn't do an interview with him. He does a long ass interview with the author of a doomerism book that focuses on hypothetical future damage that may or may not happen. Which main purpose is to distract from current real harms. On Scishow he pushes more of the same.

So your solution is to use one of the main agents that leeches on Wikipedia and other sources for free while those sources get less visits and funding and dies a slow death?

Doesn't sound like a good solution at all.

Washington Post. Owned by one of the biggest recipients of SNAP benefits in the US, because Amazon doesn't pay their employees liveable wages.

So incredibly gross.

Yeah, it's really f**d up and dangerous. He's making it people's introduction to AI, rather than focusing on the actual real life harms. This video perfectly addresses it.

Yup. And on Scishow he's pushing ControlAI a TESCREAL/EA organisation where CEO is connected to LessWrong (Eliezer Yudkowsky) too. :/

It's messy AF.