Dr Rebecca Williams
banner
volcanologist.bsky.social
Dr Rebecca Williams
@volcanologist.bsky.social

Reader in Volcanology in Geology @Hull. Waffle about volcanoes, HigherEd, tea and occasional running. SFHEA & STEM ambassador. She/her.

Sociology 22%
Public Health 15%
Pinned
It's about time I announced a project that I've been working on in the last year... I wrote a book!

'Volcanoes: 10 things you should know' published by @orionbooks.bsky.social Seven Dials will be out in September. It's available to pre-order now. Links: linktr.ee/volcanologist

Introducing the kids to Terry Pratchett in the same way I discovered Terry Pratchett.

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

One of my favourite episodes of Radio 4's #Ramblings, ever!

Anjana's knowledge and passion for all things 'rock' are hugely inspiring, and this episode is an absolute delight. Listen again via link below, and follow Anjana here: @anjanakhatwa.bsky.social

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m...
BBC Radio 4 - Ramblings, Whispering Rocks with Anjana Khatwa
Clare joins earth scientist Anjana Khatwa in Dorset to explore the landscape she loves.
www.bbc.co.uk

I've not read this! Thanks for the rec

Thanks! I've not read this, adding it to my wishlist

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

Review of the Fossil Files podcast @thefossilfiles.bsky.social just in from a palaeo podcast skeptic: "I really thought palaeo podcasts weren't for me, but I guess I was listening to the wrong ones". Listen on libsyn or wherever you get your podcasts: fossils.libsyn.com
The Fossil Files
In “The Fossil Files”, a pair of palaeontologists delve into the latest discoveries from the world of palaeontology and seek to bring fossils to back to life. Each episode, Susie and Rob will discuss ...
fossils.libsyn.com

Oh you are too kind ❤️
Simple rule: Stop setting carbon on fire to make energy. It ain't sustainable.
Drax still burning 250-year-old trees sourced from forests in Canada, experts say
Exclusive: report by Stand.earth says subsidiary of power plant received truckloads of whole logs at biomass pellet sites
www.theguardian.com

Even harder in the UK where we have 3 years and the drive is for bigger credit modules and less contact. Students can only actually take 16-18 modules in a degree programme at most institutions (at most). We can't teach them everything.

What book would you recommend to young scientists these days?

In the 90s I was of course recommended, as were many others, The Double Helix. "An incredible story of scientific endeavour and discovery".

What inspirational books about scientific process and doing science could we be recommending?

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

The Old Copper complex, was an ancient Native American culture around Michigan that mined (>5,000 mines) & worked the 99% pure native copper for tools, weapons, and ornaments as far back as 9,500 yrs. Fascinating! #MichiganCopper More

#OreCup ⚒️ sci-fi 🧪 🖖🏼 scifi Geosciences #WomenInSTEM geology 🍎 🔭🪐
America's First Metal Industry: The Old Copper Complex
YouTube video by UArizona Mining Engineering & Mineral Resources
youtu.be

That is wild.

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

~100,000 years of rainfall… 💦

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

I found a new women in engineering podcast today whilst making a speaker shortlist for a future @earthsciencewomen.bsky.social event!

Passing on to the world of Bluesky 😀

open.spotify.com/show/7D5CxK7...

[event release coming in January 2026]
#021 Chai & Chat Engineering with Lisa Martello
open.spotify.com

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

🧪🌋⚒️ This never gets boring. A pulse of hot lava meanders down the vent proximal surface flow this morning at Kilauea volcano #Hawaii. More than just pretty, Volcanologists study time variations of lava, tephra & gas distribution, movement, & composition to understand volcanic processes and hazards
For those with a scholarly interest in Franklin, Watson, and other pioneering researchers in molecular biology, @sciencehistory.org has just opened our new landmark collection of their papers, and applications for research fellowships are currently open:

www.sciencehistory.org/hmbc
History of Molecular Biology Collection
This unparalleled collection includes Rosalind Franklin's historic 'Photo 51,' which revealed the double-helix structure of DNA.
www.sciencehistory.org
On one evening, the speakers were divided up and went to dinner parties hosted by some of the wealthy folks who lived around Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. My dinner was delightful, with good conversation with our host (the mayor of a nearby village), his friends, and some other speakers.

34/41

I guess for me the lack of explicit discussion is telling.

And yes, it's still very very rife and manifests in that somewhat subtle exclusion. Which is why it's so important to call it out for what it is.

But I also think this article isn't providing the nuance that it is being promoted as doing. I don't think it's helpful to frame this as "Franklin wasn't a victim" either.

True. Franklin has become a poster child for a very common experience. It's all too common to be contributing ideas, data, etc but then to be missed off the critical paper or prize. It's felt so painfully by so many, there's a desperation to trying to write those wrongs.

Reposted by Rebecca Williams

Here, Rosalind Franklin's colleague Maurice himself argues to the head of their lab in London that their data should not have been leaked to Watson and Crick. You're welcome.

In all the years of reading about Rosalind Franklin I've never actually come across the story or narrative distilled down into 'they stole Photo 51' nor that Franklin didn't know the worth of her own data. I mean, she published her work in the same journal.
That simple narrative helps no one.

And the article may argue that Franklin was an equal contributor, which she was. But that contribution was clearly not recognised, either in published work nor in the later Nobel Prize.

How does the evidence presented suggest there was no scientific injustice?

It's interesting though. The article clearly says that whilst the data was shared with them, they used it without permission and then didn't credit it in their work. Stealing might not be the right word, but that's certainly underhand and all too common an experience for women in science.

I feel like a woman in STEM will have written that article using exactly the same pieces of archival data very differently through a lens of lived experience and the lived experiences of their friends and colleagues.

Right?!

I'd never heard the story that she didn't understand her own data either. Not sure where that even comes from in the article.

Right? I thought I was reading it wrong. Because this appeared on my feed from folk who are receiving this article differently.

It's also odd that Franklin's gender, and Watson's misogyny isn't discussed. And how that may have been a factor in whether the contribution was recognised and credited equally at the time.

I haven't read Double Helix for a long time, but it was ick wasn't it? That's what I remember of it

I'm uncomfortable with the idea that using data without permission even if shared willingly as part of a discussion, and then not crediting the contribution, isn't a scientific injustice. That's not recognising something as an equal contribution. An equal contribution would be credited.

I think my reaction to the piece is kind of similar. I get that the joke and her data being stolen is probably misplaced. But the argument that she was an equal contributor so people should stop thinking of this as a bit of a injustice seems off. Because that contribution wasn't credited correctly.