Crown Prince Thutmose
@thutmose.bsky.social
Ḏḥwtj-ms. Jmn-ḥtp did it.
Nothing comes from nothing, and everything is the way it is because it got that way.
Nothing comes from nothing, and everything is the way it is because it got that way.
Pinned
He’s rejecting both centrist and right-wing parties. Centrism is defined by its “bothsides-ism”. It doesn’t exist without situating itself between the left (egalitarianism) and the right (despotism). The one thing that the center and the right have in common is a non-egalitarian foundation.
It looks like they are test driving “bothsides-ism” in Canada.
I have no political home in Canada, yet I'm often accused of supporting one party or another, when I actually view them all with equal contempt. Often for different reasons, but with equal contempt all the same
January 9, 2026 at 11:08 AM
He’s rejecting both centrist and right-wing parties. Centrism is defined by its “bothsides-ism”. It doesn’t exist without situating itself between the left (egalitarianism) and the right (despotism). The one thing that the center and the right have in common is a non-egalitarian foundation.
He explicitly said that he holds them in contempt for different reasons, meaning that he does see them differently. Perhaps he’s referring to the fact that they’re all variations of state capitalism.
yeah, you are part of the problem. lol thank you for admitting it. if you can't see differences in the parties, you have gobbled the propaganda of one of them. You just dont realize it yet.
I have no political home in Canada, yet I'm often accused of supporting one party or another, when I actually view them all with equal contempt. Often for different reasons, but with equal contempt all the same
January 8, 2026 at 9:31 PM
He explicitly said that he holds them in contempt for different reasons, meaning that he does see them differently. Perhaps he’s referring to the fact that they’re all variations of state capitalism.
Self-identification with an in-group means simultaneously identifying and defining everyone else into an out-group, cousin.
So people think that [Jew = Person Who Believes in Judaism], and then they try to define Judaism as a set of Truth Propositions ('Jews believe in the Old Testament'). And thus they define Jews by defining Judaism.
January 8, 2026 at 11:11 AM
Self-identification with an in-group means simultaneously identifying and defining everyone else into an out-group, cousin.
Why don’t we look through an empirical lens? Together. It’s always good that we look at multiple sides before we judge. If you’re moderate left, then it means that you do have a functional definition of left and right.
To be clear, your baseline definitions are not arbitrary, right?
To be clear, your baseline definitions are not arbitrary, right?
January 7, 2026 at 9:19 PM
Why don’t we look through an empirical lens? Together. It’s always good that we look at multiple sides before we judge. If you’re moderate left, then it means that you do have a functional definition of left and right.
To be clear, your baseline definitions are not arbitrary, right?
To be clear, your baseline definitions are not arbitrary, right?
Adding the alpha privative (ie. the an-) to the first three negates them, creating the concepts of Anattan, Anatman, and Anautón. Like how Atheism is the negation of Theism.
Ancient Egyptian doesn’t have an alpha privative, but uses nn or nj to mean not or non. So, Jtn becomes Nj-jtn or Nn-jtn.
Ancient Egyptian doesn’t have an alpha privative, but uses nn or nj to mean not or non. So, Jtn becomes Nj-jtn or Nn-jtn.
Atman (Sanskrit)
Attan (Pali)
Autón (Ancient Greek)
Aten (Ancient Egyptian)
These concepts all refer to the individual “self” in some way. The first two are confirmed cognates. The first three are reflexive (ie. object) pronouns. The last is the oldest attested, but a different language family.
Attan (Pali)
Autón (Ancient Greek)
Aten (Ancient Egyptian)
These concepts all refer to the individual “self” in some way. The first two are confirmed cognates. The first three are reflexive (ie. object) pronouns. The last is the oldest attested, but a different language family.
January 7, 2026 at 5:54 PM
Adding the alpha privative (ie. the an-) to the first three negates them, creating the concepts of Anattan, Anatman, and Anautón. Like how Atheism is the negation of Theism.
Ancient Egyptian doesn’t have an alpha privative, but uses nn or nj to mean not or non. So, Jtn becomes Nj-jtn or Nn-jtn.
Ancient Egyptian doesn’t have an alpha privative, but uses nn or nj to mean not or non. So, Jtn becomes Nj-jtn or Nn-jtn.
I accept your concession. You are dismissed.
January 6, 2026 at 4:04 PM
I accept your concession. You are dismissed.
What was my answer when you asked that before?
January 6, 2026 at 4:00 PM
What was my answer when you asked that before?
You asserted that I hadn’t spoken to anyone, which my profile demonstrates otherwise. I called you out for it, and now you’re moving the goalposts. It’s almost as if your worldview is arbitrary, and detached from relativity.
January 6, 2026 at 3:51 PM
You asserted that I hadn’t spoken to anyone, which my profile demonstrates otherwise. I called you out for it, and now you’re moving the goalposts. It’s almost as if your worldview is arbitrary, and detached from relativity.
It’s the morning, and I’ve already spoken to multiple people. It’s like everything that you say starts from contradiction.
Do you have a theory of mind?
Do you have a theory of mind?
January 6, 2026 at 3:46 PM
It’s the morning, and I’ve already spoken to multiple people. It’s like everything that you say starts from contradiction.
Do you have a theory of mind?
Do you have a theory of mind?
The Contrarians are getting upset.
January 6, 2026 at 3:41 PM
The Contrarians are getting upset.
Reposted by Crown Prince Thutmose
#Samaritanism is an Israelite cousin to Judaism, as it were. The Samaritan Torah is older, shorter, and tends to conserve more original traits of the common progenitor religion. One crucial difference is the importance of Mount Gerizim, which plays the same theological anchor role as Mount Zion.
January 4, 2026 at 3:37 PM
#Samaritanism is an Israelite cousin to Judaism, as it were. The Samaritan Torah is older, shorter, and tends to conserve more original traits of the common progenitor religion. One crucial difference is the importance of Mount Gerizim, which plays the same theological anchor role as Mount Zion.
You’re alluding to the institution of the state itself. Authoritarianism requires a judicial monopoly on violence to enforce class hierarchy, which is why the state is inherently a right-wing institution.
That’s also what the fasces symbol represents. The judicial supremacy of the state.
That’s also what the fasces symbol represents. The judicial supremacy of the state.
January 5, 2026 at 5:10 PM
You’re alluding to the institution of the state itself. Authoritarianism requires a judicial monopoly on violence to enforce class hierarchy, which is why the state is inherently a right-wing institution.
That’s also what the fasces symbol represents. The judicial supremacy of the state.
That’s also what the fasces symbol represents. The judicial supremacy of the state.
When you self-identify with a racial in-group, you’ve necessarily created a racial out-group. That very act of unilateral self-identification (ie. self-reference) means that you’ve simultaneously racialized others against their consent. Problematic given that race itself is ideological nonsense.
We're ✡️. It's not just a religion. It's literally in our dna
We come in all degrees of melanin & many of us don't care about categories on a demographics form nor do we need them to define us.
So when someone Jewish says they're not white, pls just accept it
We don't tell others who they are
2/2
We come in all degrees of melanin & many of us don't care about categories on a demographics form nor do we need them to define us.
So when someone Jewish says they're not white, pls just accept it
We don't tell others who they are
2/2
January 4, 2026 at 7:43 PM
When you self-identify with a racial in-group, you’ve necessarily created a racial out-group. That very act of unilateral self-identification (ie. self-reference) means that you’ve simultaneously racialized others against their consent. Problematic given that race itself is ideological nonsense.
#Samaritanism is an Israelite cousin to Judaism, as it were. The Samaritan Torah is older, shorter, and tends to conserve more original traits of the common progenitor religion. One crucial difference is the importance of Mount Gerizim, which plays the same theological anchor role as Mount Zion.
January 4, 2026 at 3:37 PM
#Samaritanism is an Israelite cousin to Judaism, as it were. The Samaritan Torah is older, shorter, and tends to conserve more original traits of the common progenitor religion. One crucial difference is the importance of Mount Gerizim, which plays the same theological anchor role as Mount Zion.
Instant red flag. Any time a woman praises Ayn Rand, I get Rose the Hat vibes.
January 2, 2026 at 10:35 PM
Instant red flag. Any time a woman praises Ayn Rand, I get Rose the Hat vibes.
Reposted by Crown Prince Thutmose
Agrippa had five, according to Sextus, and the Modes largely correspond to the Pramanas of the Dharmic religions. Something interesting happens when you combine them into a Hasse diagram too.
If a = circular, then bcde are non-circular. If b is regressive, then acde are non-regressive. If c…etc.
If a = circular, then bcde are non-circular. If b is regressive, then acde are non-regressive. If c…etc.
December 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Agrippa had five, according to Sextus, and the Modes largely correspond to the Pramanas of the Dharmic religions. Something interesting happens when you combine them into a Hasse diagram too.
If a = circular, then bcde are non-circular. If b is regressive, then acde are non-regressive. If c…etc.
If a = circular, then bcde are non-circular. If b is regressive, then acde are non-regressive. If c…etc.
A disk is the embodiment of circularity. It implies:
- no angles
- no hierarchy of parts
- no beginning or end
- maximal symmetry
- complete self-containment
It’s a representation of narcissism and nihilism because there is no arc of progression. It’s arbitrary once time is removed. Absolute.
- no angles
- no hierarchy of parts
- no beginning or end
- maximal symmetry
- complete self-containment
It’s a representation of narcissism and nihilism because there is no arc of progression. It’s arbitrary once time is removed. Absolute.
January 2, 2026 at 9:32 PM
A disk is the embodiment of circularity. It implies:
- no angles
- no hierarchy of parts
- no beginning or end
- maximal symmetry
- complete self-containment
It’s a representation of narcissism and nihilism because there is no arc of progression. It’s arbitrary once time is removed. Absolute.
- no angles
- no hierarchy of parts
- no beginning or end
- maximal symmetry
- complete self-containment
It’s a representation of narcissism and nihilism because there is no arc of progression. It’s arbitrary once time is removed. Absolute.
Allism = allos,(“other”) + -ism,(“ideology, principle, or condition born of”) = Condition born of the Other. Altruism. I think that many would just prefer the term normal, though.
It’s evolutionary, that’s for sure. As obligate social primates, we are, afterall, oriented towards the Other.
It’s evolutionary, that’s for sure. As obligate social primates, we are, afterall, oriented towards the Other.
January 2, 2026 at 8:46 PM
Allism = allos,(“other”) + -ism,(“ideology, principle, or condition born of”) = Condition born of the Other. Altruism. I think that many would just prefer the term normal, though.
It’s evolutionary, that’s for sure. As obligate social primates, we are, afterall, oriented towards the Other.
It’s evolutionary, that’s for sure. As obligate social primates, we are, afterall, oriented towards the Other.
It’s the perspective of Epimetheus (“afterthought”). An empty Set. Starting from the future is obviously an unrealized objective because it hasn’t happened. There’s no sensory experience yet to measure by definition. It’s Absolute.
Affirmation of the unreal is an undoing of that which is real.
Affirmation of the unreal is an undoing of that which is real.
The future is not a foundation. It’s a placeholder for desire.
January 2, 2026 at 2:10 PM
It’s the perspective of Epimetheus (“afterthought”). An empty Set. Starting from the future is obviously an unrealized objective because it hasn’t happened. There’s no sensory experience yet to measure by definition. It’s Absolute.
Affirmation of the unreal is an undoing of that which is real.
Affirmation of the unreal is an undoing of that which is real.
Nah. I’m an outsider looking in, and I don’t have the biases that you carry. Before you make some xenophobic remark, I’ll be happy to butt out once your country stops interfering with mine.
When you play state capitalist games, you win state capitalist prizes.
When you play state capitalist games, you win state capitalist prizes.
Nah, it's just that you're a bunch of self-righteous halfwits.
January 2, 2026 at 12:40 PM
Nah. I’m an outsider looking in, and I don’t have the biases that you carry. Before you make some xenophobic remark, I’ll be happy to butt out once your country stops interfering with mine.
When you play state capitalist games, you win state capitalist prizes.
When you play state capitalist games, you win state capitalist prizes.
Objectivism is constructed from the unrealized ideal of free market capitalism. Neoliberalism is constructed from the unrealized ideal of free market capitalism. Objectivism is also Atenism, or maybe Neo-Atenism I should say.
I’m curious how liberals and new atheists view Atenism and Akhenaten.
I’m curious how liberals and new atheists view Atenism and Akhenaten.
a small axolotl is walking on a piece of paper .
ALT: a small axolotl is walking on a piece of paper .
media.tenor.com
January 2, 2026 at 12:34 PM
Objectivism is constructed from the unrealized ideal of free market capitalism. Neoliberalism is constructed from the unrealized ideal of free market capitalism. Objectivism is also Atenism, or maybe Neo-Atenism I should say.
I’m curious how liberals and new atheists view Atenism and Akhenaten.
I’m curious how liberals and new atheists view Atenism and Akhenaten.
It’s true.
On a completely unrelated note, of course, the Ancient Egyptian verb jtn, or Aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc, or flat circular object. As an -ism,(”ideology, principle, or condition born of”), that means Contrarianism.
Flat and Circular, indeed.
On a completely unrelated note, of course, the Ancient Egyptian verb jtn, or Aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc, or flat circular object. As an -ism,(”ideology, principle, or condition born of”), that means Contrarianism.
Flat and Circular, indeed.
January 2, 2026 at 11:43 AM
It’s true.
On a completely unrelated note, of course, the Ancient Egyptian verb jtn, or Aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc, or flat circular object. As an -ism,(”ideology, principle, or condition born of”), that means Contrarianism.
Flat and Circular, indeed.
On a completely unrelated note, of course, the Ancient Egyptian verb jtn, or Aten, means to object, oppose, or contradict. As a noun, it means disc, or flat circular object. As an -ism,(”ideology, principle, or condition born of”), that means Contrarianism.
Flat and Circular, indeed.
I’m kind of curious. Who is it that you think were the good guys in the Amarna heresy? Or do you mean that there were no good guys in that situation?
Yes, but the guys erasing Akhenaten were not really the good guys.
January 2, 2026 at 11:33 AM
I’m kind of curious. Who is it that you think were the good guys in the Amarna heresy? Or do you mean that there were no good guys in that situation?
Yep. There’s definitely Anomie.
Anti-normative (ie. normlessness), which is anti-nominative. In cognitive grammar terms, that’s a pathology built around the reflexive self, an object pronoun aspect. Objectification of the Self.
The nominative is the subject. The dative is an anti-nominative.
Anti-normative (ie. normlessness), which is anti-nominative. In cognitive grammar terms, that’s a pathology built around the reflexive self, an object pronoun aspect. Objectification of the Self.
The nominative is the subject. The dative is an anti-nominative.
January 2, 2026 at 9:44 AM
Yep. There’s definitely Anomie.
Anti-normative (ie. normlessness), which is anti-nominative. In cognitive grammar terms, that’s a pathology built around the reflexive self, an object pronoun aspect. Objectification of the Self.
The nominative is the subject. The dative is an anti-nominative.
Anti-normative (ie. normlessness), which is anti-nominative. In cognitive grammar terms, that’s a pathology built around the reflexive self, an object pronoun aspect. Objectification of the Self.
The nominative is the subject. The dative is an anti-nominative.
The concept of “now” used by your brain will only ever cover about 80 years of existence, on average. A worldview built solely on this perspective will hold a bias to their own place in space and time, including the meaning of words. It’s subtle, but it’s an appeal to novelty.
December 30, 2025 at 4:05 PM
The concept of “now” used by your brain will only ever cover about 80 years of existence, on average. A worldview built solely on this perspective will hold a bias to their own place in space and time, including the meaning of words. It’s subtle, but it’s an appeal to novelty.