As a triconsonental root, Ptahhotep is also a palindrome: the same backwards as it is forwards.

ptḥ-ḥtp

The Buddhists would construct it, send off a few photos and screenshots, then break it down immediately. Like a mandala.

As an endnote, I separate culture and religion. They’re obviously interrelated, but I ordered them as such because other great apes have developed culture, but not complex semiotic language systems. Without the necessary linguistic anchor, no collection of words (ie. formal vocabulary). No religion.

Intelligence = from Latin intelligere,(“reason, understanding”), from inter,(“between”) + legere,(“to speak, to choose/collect one’s words”) = An Inter-language. Inter-logic. Inter-lect.

Thus, AI circles around something like Constructed Inter-Language. Mathematics. Self-referential. Autological.

“And it was such that the Centrists arose, a people neither hot nor cold,
but eternally lukewarm, whose emblem was a beige flag depicting a shrug.”

Society, culture, and religion are facets of the same phenomenon: the egregore, a sort of superorganism that emerges from coordinated minds. Not supernatural, but causally powerful; it shapes reality because humans act together, reinforcing shared patterns of meaning.

Religion is an egregore built from axioms and shared vocabulary. Rituals, myths, and moral codes coordinate behaviour and thought, binding humans into a cohesive worldview. It’s a subset of cult-ure that is amplified by attention, repetition, and communication.

Culture is the symbolic layer within this egregore: stories, art, customs, and values. It specifically transmits knowledge across generations, letting humans construct meaning across time without direct contact. Culture is the personality of that collective mind, alive in every ritual and tradition.

Society itself is an egregore in this sense: an interdependent web of social relationships, roles, laws, and norms. No single person contains it. It exists in interactions, moral behaviour, and persists beyond any one person, while helping shape what each member perceives as reality.

An egregore is actually a shared mental construct that emerges when multiple minds align around the same ideas, symbols, or goals. While not directly physical, it shapes behaviour and cognition, acting like a collective pattern with measurable influence across communities that share it.

The word comes from the Greek egrégoroi,(“Watchers, those who are Awake”), and originally referred to autonomous vigilant beings. A naturalistic description would be more along the lines of a dependent group mind formed by collective attention and intention.

The Buddhist and Hindu term avidya comes from the same root as video and vision. It means ignorance of reality, feigned or otherwise, or more literally to “unsee” or “not-see”.

Curious. National Zionism also depends on not-see’ing reality.

If you pronounce the /h/ as /ḫ/ (a kind of /kh/ sound in the back of the throat), as would be the case in other semitic languages, including biblical hebrew, a very interesting name emerges if you look at Netanyahu’s name backwards. Like a dual, or a mirror.

Uḫaynaten, or Akhenaten.

If someone lacks ToM, they may fail to reliably model or predict other minds or to recognize that others hold perspectives. Their cognitive and conceptual world will often become self-centered and circular whose foundation is anchored only in their own experiences.

Autón in Ancient Greek.

See what I mean, Leigh?

Conspiracies and slander, pathologically starting from a pre-determined (ie. chosen) objective of opposition and contradiction, then working backwards. Circular reasoning.

DARVO (Deny & Attack by Reversing Victim & Offender) is inherently counter-factual.

Which things did I claim to be facts, other than factual arguments outranking judicial arguments?

Let’s science this out then. If we have just agreed that empirical science outranks judicial arguments, then we both necessarily agree that either the event happened or it didn’t, yes?

Not sure what you mean here. I am asking about your claim. What are the answers to the actual questions that were asked?

If you watch closely, you’ll notice that Zionists tend to reframe everything into judicial arguments rather than empirical arguments when determining if the genocide occurred.

Advocatus Diaboli, or Devil’s Advocate, translates to the lawyer of the objector/slanderer. He’ll slander the UN. Watch.