Mostly the Denver Nuggets, lots of political humor and policy, some AppSec stuff that relates to my work, shitposts, and food.
End of disclaimer 🫡
- Repost this = I donate $1.
- Follow @boltsmag.org = I donate $1.
- Donate (link below) + tell me how much = I match your donation.
(Donate monthly = I match a year's worth)
- Repost this = I donate $1.
- Follow @boltsmag.org = I donate $1.
- Donate (link below) + tell me how much = I match your donation.
(Donate monthly = I match a year's worth)
They are corrupt enough to consistently order you to violate the law and then will back the bus up over you when they’re caught lying, though.
Makes saying no the only choice, IMO.
Wall Street Journal:
"A Defense Department official ... said Hegseth was the 'target engagement authority,' the key figure who authorized the strike."
www.wsj.com/politics/whi...
They are corrupt enough to consistently order you to violate the law and then will back the bus up over you when they’re caught lying, though.
Makes saying no the only choice, IMO.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s actions could spark investigations for war crimes or outright murder, sources told The Intercept.
theintercept.com/2025/12/02/h...
Protest by the United States Against Attacks by Japanese Naval Forces on Survivors of Torpedoed American Merchant Vessels June 1944
"The United States Government protests most emphatically against this inhuman form of warfare ..."
Protest by the United States Against Attacks by Japanese Naval Forces on Survivors of Torpedoed American Merchant Vessels June 1944
"The United States Government protests most emphatically against this inhuman form of warfare ..."
"Neither Hegseth’s statement nor the explanation attributed to Bradley ... makes legal sense.
...
It cannot be a defense to say, as Hegseth does, that one has killed because one’s objective was 'lethal, kinetic strikes.'"
"Neither Hegseth’s statement nor the explanation attributed to Bradley ... makes legal sense.
...
It cannot be a defense to say, as Hegseth does, that one has killed because one’s objective was 'lethal, kinetic strikes.'"
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/c...
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/c...
Even if half the characters are terrible people.
Even if half the characters are terrible people.
I do my part to combat this by hating all humans that dress in button up linen shirts as if they had murdered my spouse.
I do my part to combat this by hating all humans that dress in button up linen shirts as if they had murdered my spouse.
I think my belief that we need to be good to Trans people stems from the fact that I’m fairly confident I would not survive this level of abuse. That’s a level of strength I can’t fathom.
I think my belief that we need to be good to Trans people stems from the fact that I’m fairly confident I would not survive this level of abuse. That’s a level of strength I can’t fathom.
"If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work. I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies..."
"If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work. I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies..."
@punchbowlnews.bsky.social
Enlisted troops do take an oath to the Commander in Chief, provided the orders are legal. Officers swear to the constitution, not the Commander.
McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took
(Not a no!)
Enlisted troops do take an oath to the Commander in Chief, provided the orders are legal. Officers swear to the constitution, not the Commander.