Scholarly Futures
banner
scholarlyfutures.bsky.social
Scholarly Futures
@scholarlyfutures.bsky.social
An exploratory project to explore the uncertain future of scholarly communication, research practices and academic publishing amid accelerating change. By @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @roobina.bsky.social @jontreadway.bsky.social and @grnr25.bsky.social
Debates about paying peer reviewers go back and forth, but @grnr25.bsky.social presents experience of doing just that at a small, gold OA journal. The economics make sense. Find out why 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
January 27, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Our first guest post! Emma Green @majordoma.bsky.social attended last week's APE conference and pondered whether we are truly doing enough to transform the industry in the face of current challenges. What do you think? 🤔
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
January 20, 2026 at 4:52 PM
The latest post on our Scholarly Futures Substack is live and digs into how AI is used in peer review. It aids in technical checks & helps reviewers with their reports. But is there any governance or best practice out there? By @roobina.bsky.social 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Peer review needs a revolution. AI is already driving it
Challenges to peer review affect the quality and efficiency of academic publishing. AI tools already help reviewers and publishers but are we prepared for the future?
open.substack.com
January 13, 2026 at 8:52 PM
Lots of predictions out there about the year ahead, so we asked AIs what they thought would happen in scholarly communications in 2026. AI predicts more AI! Do you agree?
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
@roobina.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @jontreadway.bsky.social @grnr25.bsky.social
January 6, 2026 at 2:38 PM
Instead of scholarly communication or academic publishing, this week we share on and off topic content we have enjoyed this year. Plus @grnr25.bsky.social shares some lessons learned @jontreadway.bsky.social @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social @roobina.bsky.social open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
December 23, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity has been relatively quiet in 2025, releasing just two misconduct findings with only two weeks remaining in the year — the fewest the office has released since at least 2006. ORI typically releases an average of about 10 findings a year.
ORI has released just two misconduct findings this year
The U.S. Office of Research Integrity has been relatively quiet in 2025, releasing just two misconduct findings with only two weeks remaining in the year — the fewest the office has released since …
retractionwatch.com
December 18, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Last week I attended the #STMInnovation and #STMIntegrity days in London.
I believe the scholarly research ecosystem needs to change in a pretty substantial way if we're to face in to the societal threats that have emerged.
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/12/17/w...
Why We Must Work Together to Harden the Scholarly Supply Chain - The Scholarly Kitchen
At the STM innovation and Integrity days in London last week, it's clear that research integrity has become an increasingly pressing issue. Many publishers are reporting significant increases in submi...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
December 17, 2025 at 11:27 AM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Very much enjoyed last week's meeting in Cambridge about the Publish-Review-Curate (PRC) model for scholarly publishing. There were lots of highly inspiring discussions, including an important discussion about strengthening coordination between initiatives in this area.

asapbio.org/reimagining-...
Reimagining Scholarly Publishing: Outcomes From A Public Forum To Discuss The Publish, Review, Curate (PRC) Publishing Model – ASAPbio
At a meeting held on the 3rd December 2025 at Kings College, Cambridge over 50 delegates, comprising researchers, publishers, librarians, research funders and
asapbio.org
December 12, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Latest post by @jontreadway.bsky.social explores what the shortlist and winners of the Vesalius Innovation Award say about changes in the research workflow system.
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
December 17, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
📣 On demand: Watch our webinar with Research Information and see how publishers can scale #ResearchIntegrity checks with the Dimensions Author Check API.

Presented by Dr Leslie McIntosh & Tyler Ruse.

🔗 See the webinar now: https://ow.ly/Rfzf50XGcff

#scholcomm
December 9, 2025 at 12:02 PM
Will AI help or hinder the Publish, Read, Curare model? New post from @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social for our Substack 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
December 9, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
🚀 Big news for open research information!

From 2026, @cnrs.fr will no longer have institutional access to Web of Science.

This move aligns with the vision of the Barcelona Declaration and shows how institutions can operationalise the transition to open systems.

🔗 www.cnrs.fr/en/update/cn...
Le CNRS s’émancipe du Web of Science
À partir du 1er janvier 2026, le CNRS coupera l’accès à l’une des plus importantes bases bibliométriques commerciales : le
www.cnrs.fr
December 5, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
This afternoon, I will give a public lecture about #ResearchIntegrity and #ImageForensics, at the University of Bern, CH, where I will receive an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Science tomorrow.

Thank you for your support ❤️
December 5, 2025 at 12:07 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
🚨 Webinar Alert 👉 Dec 4 @ 10am ET

What does #GenAI do well and where does it fail without supporting tech?

We’ll explore how knowledge graphs, symbolic reasoning & more can help GenAI!

🔗 Register: https://ow.ly/QGVI50Xx7y3
November 24, 2025 at 7:58 PM
How much further can consolidation go in scholarly publishing, and could winds of change blow in from elsewhere to reshape the market, perhaps even ‘disrupt’ the way things are done? Latest by @roobina.bsky.social 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
The last large acquisition before big tech brings big change?
The recent announcement that OUP is acquiring Karger heralds yet more consolidation in an industry where there have been growing concerns about market concentration, monetisation and monopolies.
open.substack.com
November 25, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Excellent start to #Munin2025 with the panel on open #metadata with perspectives from @barcelonadori.bsky.social, @doaj.bsky.social, @oa2020.org, @pkp.sfu.ca and SCOAP3 @cern.bsky.social.
Followed by the beautiful sight of the final sunset of the year from UiT Campus
November 18, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Fascinating post by @jontreadway.bsky.social this week about the 'Chuna Cycle' and how well it could map onto academic publishing. Find out more 👇
My second article for @scholarlyfutures.bsky.social - looking at the concept of a China cycle and what implications it might have for research and scholarly publishing.

scholarlyfutures.substack.com/p/is-the-chi...
November 19, 2025 at 11:39 AM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
Scholastica & Maverick Release New Survey Report: Tech Needs of Small and Medium Publishers
Scholastica & Maverick Release New Survey Report: Tech Needs of Small and Medium Publishers
Member News Release submitted by Scholastica on 11/05/2025.
www.sspnet.org
November 13, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
The @ama-assn.org will cease publication of its ethics journal at the end of this year.
AMA ethics journal shutters after 26 years
The American Medical Association will cease publication of its ethics journal at the end of this year.  The AMA Journal of Ethics, an open access, peer-reviewed journal was founded in 1999 und…
retractionwatch.com
November 14, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Is there a major health crisis coming for STM publishing? @sarahgreaves18.bsky.social shares her thoughts on the @stmassoc.bsky.social day that runs adjacent to the Frankfurt Book Fair: 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
Does Publishing need a Pulse Check or Resuscitation?
Sharing my thoughts and fears on whether a major health crisis for STM publishing is coming or not.....
open.substack.com
November 11, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Amid growing financial pressure, exacerbated by the increasing dominance of open access, learned societies face a defining moment. Leveraging their community could be the answer. By @grnr25.bsky.social 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
The untapped potential of community
Amid growing financial pressure, exacerbated by the increasing dominance of open access, learned societies face a defining moment.
open.substack.com
November 5, 2025 at 3:32 PM
To round off the week, we bring this quick update on research security, since our post on Tuesday. Written by @roobina.bsky.social about an announcement from the @ec.europa.eu and a report by @scienceeurope.org
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
October 31, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
This is something I have thought about a lot over the last couple of years, especially since 2022.

The Great Pullback: Why Academic Social Media’s Fragmentation Matters
@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/10/29/g...

1/12
Guest Post — The Great Pullback: Why Academic Social Media’s Fragmentation Matters - The Scholarly Kitchen
Today's guest bloggers share insights into the fragmented, tiring, and uncertain digital landscape for academics, and evidence that a shift is underway — with implications for scholarly communication ...
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
October 30, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Reposted by Scholarly Futures
✅ More transparency online.

As of today, researchers can access data from the biggest online platforms.

Why?

To study their societal impact and address risks like illegal content and scams – making the online world safer, especially for minors.

link.europa.eu/RMdwCV
October 29, 2025 at 1:39 PM
This week, @roobina.bsky.social takes a look at research security and how it could create tensions with open science and open data: 👇
open.substack.com/pub/scholarl...
October 28, 2025 at 12:58 PM