Steven Fielding
banner
polprofsteve2024.bsky.social
Steven Fielding
@polprofsteve2024.bsky.social

Emeritus Prof, writing (slowly) about Labour’s existential struggles since 1976 for Polity. Knows stuff about politics & culture.
Labour List: https://labourlist.org/author/s-fielding/
Zeitgeist Tapes: https://shorturl.at/nwdO4 .. more

Steven Fielding is an academic in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham where he is professor of political history and director of the Centre for British Politics. His most recent work A State of Play sets out the qualified constructivist view that how individuals regard real politics can be shaped by fictional works about politics. .. more

Political science 73%
History 11%
Pinned
This is I think an important perspective which not just those on the US left need to consider especially as the article is inspired by what Klein describes as Bernard Crick’s “strange little book“ which used to be almost standard reading on many UK politics courses. www.nytimes.com/2025/11/02/o...
Opinion | This Is the Way You Beat Trump — and Trumpism
www.nytimes.com

It seems like this hater of empathy only believes in it when it comes to himself.

This! This is how you deal with him.
Trump Threatens To Sue BBC Over Misleading Edit Of ‘The Vicar Of Dibley’ https://theonion.com/trump-threatens-to-sue-bbc-over-misleading-edit-of-the-vicar-of-dibley/
Trump Threatens To Sue BBC Over Misleading Edit Of ‘The Vicar Of Dibley’ https://theonion.com/trump-threatens-to-sue-bbc-over-misleading-edit-of-the-vicar-of-dibley/

It also helps if your leaders have been appointed by those who exercise this cultural and economic power!

I think more accurately it shows impartiality to those its leaders deem powerful and these days power lies less with elected governments and more with those who exercise cultural and economic power hence what we’re seeing now.

But this @yougov.co.uk poll from today suggests a lack of trust is being driven on the right bsky.app/profile/polp...
Whatever the objective reality, there’s a visceral belief on the right that the BBC is biased against them. Perhaps they should stop reading the anti-BBC press?

Reposted by Steven Fielding

If the BBC caves to Trump and hands over licence fee payers' cash to him, it will lose far more from non-renewals by licence fee payers than it would ever risk having to pay to Trump in court

That just shows you how closely I follow this thing! Alan Carr is in contrast a sadly cracked mirror version of Julian Clary.

That’s cheap advertising screen time for these celebrities. I see Nick Mohammed won it and I like his comedy but it wasn’t cutting through much: I bet it does now.

I’m not at all surprised that he was on it. But I think there’s a lot of cross publicity going on (the celebrity BBC historian who I know was in it has a new series to promote) so the kinds of vaguely corrupt deals their agents will have done for them will have reflected that.

It happened under Thatcher first because the BBC needed audiences to protect itself politically and also needed cheaper output and second because of the new cost of ITV franchises meant the opposition chased audiences with even greater alacrity.

Reposted by Steven Fielding

Everyone is a little bit right... and a little bit wrong. Our editor @emmaburnell.bsky.social on what the BBC crisis teaches us about the political moment we're in.
‘The BBC crisis and our half-right, half-wrong politics’ – LabourList
The BBC is in crisis - again. This is not a piece reporting on what has happened. You can't move for those today. Here's the…
labourlist.org

I look forward to that mystery being solved!

I don’t know if I’m correct but whenever I see a big gap between men being willing to have a definite opinion compared to women I tend to assume it’s on an issue about which most people really don’t know much but that men are are willing to say something even if it’s BS.

Whatever the objective reality, there’s a visceral belief on the right that the BBC is biased against them. Perhaps they should stop reading the anti-BBC press?

But before the 1980s the creatives in TV were free to make things they wanted to watch rather than audiences (who only had 3 channels). Today they’re forced to make things they wouldn’t want to watch but execs figure the dumb audience will. I’m simplifying but there’s some truth in that distinction.

The one off plays he (& many others wrote) wrote would not have seen the light of day today - way too expensive and they don’t build an audience up by repetition and familiarity - and therefore maybe not the series which perhaps execs Today would seen as too challenging for audiences.

They do make good sitcoms sometimes and a 2 hander like Steptoe would at least be quite cheap. And to be fair, most sitcoms have always been poor.

When growing up, TV was an important part of my education & I suppose I just resent what it’s become, even the celebrity historian documentaries are pandering stuff which I can’t watch as they irritate & disappoint so much. That said I’m on my fourth Thin Man movie so I do like well-made rubbish.

I’m afraid I don’t watch panel shows either as they’re the laziest form of comedy and again just cheap shit.

I suppose what makes it even worse is that the reason why it’s made is that it’s cheap and that real drama is so expensive.

I’m left unmoved by this genre, which is ironic as I like drama & dramatisations of real events but this confected ‘reality’ stuff I just find irritating especially when it involves ‘celebrity’.

It is pretty insidious. A few years ago, I went into a local radio newsroom and it was flooded with copies of the Daily Mail.

You would think this particular racist would be a little more grateful given the platform the BBC regularly gives him.

Reposted by Steven Fielding

This is where I wrote that when trying to make the case that Corbynism was something from which that strand of Labour leaders should learn & engage with. It seems that once Corbynism was history they decided to act as if it never happened 🤷‍♀️ policynetwork.progressivebritain.org/wp-content/u...
policynetwork.progressivebritain.org

Yes. It became a sign of their own pragmatism & virtue (to themselves) but did reflect the real difficulties they faced tho the irony always was that the hard choices have been for them actually rather easy choices. At the same time however Crosland advocated making other kinds of hard choices.

I once wrote something similar about a whole set of Labour politician since Roy Jenkins in the 1970s who saw their job as precisely that. It’s an approach that seems ingrained in a certain kind of leader by which I mean almost all of them.

Absolutely. Now the narrative is the Dems can win in different ways in different places, but it does still need a broad narrative to unify them. Whodve thought that????