Melissa Rethlefsen
banner
mlrethlefsen.bsky.social
Melissa Rethlefsen
@mlrethlefsen.bsky.social
medical librarian, etc. Opinions my own, etc, etc.
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
We've never been more quack. I mean back...

Welcome back Duck Pond! 🦆

Read about the improvements made to the heart of campus.

bit.ly/4mdVomR
September 11, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
A @bmj.com RCT is comparing effects of use of an #OpenScience checklist on provision of study protocols, code, data, more. Too early to assess reproducibility FX!
@mariskaleeflang.bsky.social @ingestegeman.bsky.social
@floriannaudet.bsky.social @mlrethlefsen.bsky.social @amsterdamumc.bsky.social
September 5, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Had a great time working with Ayu and team on this project! (Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t; still pending full results) #prc10
September 5, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
I’m pleased to experience the 10th Peer Review Congress and present with @mlrethlefsen.bsky.social!

Our poster examines the perceptions and experiences of librarian peer reviewers for evidence synthesis methodologies. #prc2025
September 4, 2025 at 10:55 PM
It is incredibly annoying that this new NIH so-called gold standard science plan uses the exact opposite definition of reproducibility and replicability from the NASEM report. Why, just, why?
August 28, 2025 at 3:09 PM
So proud; my husband is teaching all of his colleagues how to do comprehensive author searches in multiple databases
May 23, 2025 at 8:33 PM
And in better news, my library has network cable from 1993 that is still in use
March 26, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
we just lost all 7 of our Network of National Library of Medicine, Region 5 (NNLM) library workers.

the grant that covered their salaries was terminated.

this is heartbreaking and demoralizing.
March 25, 2025 at 12:02 AM
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
In a new Editorial, JAMA editors, JAMA Network Editors in Chief, and JAMA editorial leadership address the recent executive orders that have impacted the scientific process and reaffirm their commitment to scientific and editorial integrity.

ja.ma/4b5LsIt
February 20, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Reposted by Melissa Rethlefsen
Almost all grant-review meetings under Trump 2.0 remain suspended at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), preventing the world’s largest public funder of biomedical research from spending much of its US$47 billion annual budget.

https://go.nature.com/4gM6oW4

Revealed: NIH research grants still frozen despite lawsuits challenging Trump order
The Trump administration is exploiting a loophole to keep a funding freeze in place, leaving researchers in limbo.
go.nature.com
February 20, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Just finished reading Doctored, by Charles Piller. Distressing read, but highly recommend. It was good timing for teaching my rigor and reproducibility journal club this semester
February 22, 2025 at 9:50 PM
I joined Twitter in April 2007, so I kept hoping it would go back to normal. Not so much.
February 20, 2025 at 11:20 PM