A STAT analysis of vaccine recommendations in 38 countries suggests the U.S. is now an outlier.

Part 4 of a 5-part series on the politics of preservation and power.

This article offers a reasoned call for urgent reform of the academic journal publishing system. It focuses on the ethical flaws of the current for-profit model. This model enables the transfer of public funds into the profit margins of private companies that add no meaningful value to research and even limit access to knowledge. The article describes how feedback loops in metrics used in the evaluation of scientific publishing exacerbate structural inequalities and make it difficult to break out of the system. Moreover, the opportunity for easy profit attracts dishonest actors and fuels the rise of predatory journals, which in turn corrodes public trust in science. Without systemic reforms, the current system could also undermine artificial intelligence–driven research outcomes by enabling models to be trained on a growing number of substandard scientific publications. The article concludes with ten specific proposals for action, aimed at stimulating further discussion within and beyond academia.

Have the interests of commercial publishers now become antithetical to the pursuit of knowledge?

By Richard Sever, PhD. Chief Science & Strategy Officer, openRxiv Preprints speed up science by enabling researchers to disseminate reports of new findings immediately. They also represent a simple wa...

MODERATOR:  Jonathan Schultz American Heart Association Editor-in-Chief, Science Editor SPEAKERS: Michele Avissar-Whiting Howard Hughes Medical Institute Chhavi Chauhan American Society for Investigat...