J Mill
@jessliftsclouds.bsky.social
Reposted by J Mill
Host: You could call and get Abrego Garcia back.
Trump: I could
Host: But the Supreme Court has ordered you to facilitate his release.
Trump: I'm not the one making this decision
Host: You're the president!
Trump: I could
Host: But the Supreme Court has ordered you to facilitate his release.
Trump: I'm not the one making this decision
Host: You're the president!
April 30, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Host: You could call and get Abrego Garcia back.
Trump: I could
Host: But the Supreme Court has ordered you to facilitate his release.
Trump: I'm not the one making this decision
Host: You're the president!
Trump: I could
Host: But the Supreme Court has ordered you to facilitate his release.
Trump: I'm not the one making this decision
Host: You're the president!
Due process is not too burdensome, it ensures basic fairness and provides an opportunity to be heard. It protects against mistakes.
The Trump administration called it an “administrative error.” But that error led to a nightmare for Maryland Resident Abrego Garcia.
April 1, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Due process is not too burdensome, it ensures basic fairness and provides an opportunity to be heard. It protects against mistakes.
Reposted by J Mill
NEWS
In a 112-page order, a federal judge GRANTS a preliminary injunction keeping the CFPB alive as the lawsuit progresses.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson says "the Court can and must act."
Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
In a 112-page order, a federal judge GRANTS a preliminary injunction keeping the CFPB alive as the lawsuit progresses.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson says "the Court can and must act."
Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
![In sum, the Court cannot look away or the CFPB will be dissolved and dismantled completely in approximately thirty days, well before this lawsuit has come to its conclusion. For all of the reasons set forth above, the Court will GRANT [Dkt. # 10] plaintiffs’ motion and issue a preliminary injunction that maintains the agency’s existence until this case has been resolved on the merits, reinstating and preserving the agency’s contracts, work force, data, and operational capacity, and protecting and facilitating the employees’ ability to perform statutorily required activities.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:353gzbhcjbznfxegvayffqek/bafkreih7vmwcucdcbm75gcm32kkrrb6qasydxgebm6xq3k7csgcnqyhbeq@jpeg)
March 28, 2025 at 8:40 PM
NEWS
In a 112-page order, a federal judge GRANTS a preliminary injunction keeping the CFPB alive as the lawsuit progresses.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson says "the Court can and must act."
Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
In a 112-page order, a federal judge GRANTS a preliminary injunction keeping the CFPB alive as the lawsuit progresses.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson says "the Court can and must act."
Doc storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by J Mill
Today’s win blocks the unprecedented plan to dismantle the CFPB--an agency that Congress created to protect Americans. This ruling upholds the Constitution’s separation of powers and preserves the Bureau's vital work.
Read the ruling here: www.guptawessler.com/wp-content/u...
Read the ruling here: www.guptawessler.com/wp-content/u...
www.guptawessler.com
March 28, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Today’s win blocks the unprecedented plan to dismantle the CFPB--an agency that Congress created to protect Americans. This ruling upholds the Constitution’s separation of powers and preserves the Bureau's vital work.
Read the ruling here: www.guptawessler.com/wp-content/u...
Read the ruling here: www.guptawessler.com/wp-content/u...
Social security is an actual lifeline for so many in our country. Failure to receive a social security check means that people will be unable to afford rent, to afford food, to afford simple necessities.
BREAKING: Trump's billionaire Commerce Secretary says that seniors won't care if they don't get their Social Security checks — and that anyone who does complain is a fraudster.
March 21, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Social security is an actual lifeline for so many in our country. Failure to receive a social security check means that people will be unable to afford rent, to afford food, to afford simple necessities.
Reposted by J Mill
Orders to Show Cause are very bad, and they would make any lawyer who is acting normally feel very bad and worried.
Those rules may not apply right this second.
Those rules may not apply right this second.
March 20, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Orders to Show Cause are very bad, and they would make any lawyer who is acting normally feel very bad and worried.
Those rules may not apply right this second.
Those rules may not apply right this second.
Reposted by J Mill
1/🧵 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trump—it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.
March 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
1/🧵 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trump—it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.
Reposted by J Mill
A federal court’s jurisdiction does *not* stop at the water’s edge. The question is whether the *defendants* are subject to the court order, not *where* the conduct being challenged takes place.
Were it otherwise, the government could act lawlessly overseas and courts would be powerless to stop it.
Were it otherwise, the government could act lawlessly overseas and courts would be powerless to stop it.
March 16, 2025 at 8:23 PM
A federal court’s jurisdiction does *not* stop at the water’s edge. The question is whether the *defendants* are subject to the court order, not *where* the conduct being challenged takes place.
Were it otherwise, the government could act lawlessly overseas and courts would be powerless to stop it.
Were it otherwise, the government could act lawlessly overseas and courts would be powerless to stop it.
Reposted by J Mill
HOWELL says to "sends little chills down my spine" that Trump is claiming power to unilaterally label someone a threat and bar them from all interactions, contracts, access to the government.
She says sanctions against foreigners have more due process rights than that.
She says sanctions against foreigners have more due process rights than that.
March 12, 2025 at 7:09 PM
HOWELL says to "sends little chills down my spine" that Trump is claiming power to unilaterally label someone a threat and bar them from all interactions, contracts, access to the government.
She says sanctions against foreigners have more due process rights than that.
She says sanctions against foreigners have more due process rights than that.