Trump: Marco, do you want your war with Venezuela or not?
Rubio: But this—
Trump: Marco...
Rubio: America developed the plan with input from both the Russians and Ukrainians.
Trump: Marco, do you want your war with Venezuela or not?
Rubio: But this—
Trump: Marco...
Rubio: America developed the plan with input from both the Russians and Ukrainians.
Mamdani: I've spoken about --
Trump: Just say yes, it's easier than explaining.
In consolidated authoritarianism terms, we're doing pretty well, as the regime is haphazard, meeting resistance, and growing increasingly unpopular.
Depends on one's perspective. I started using the latter standard in Jan.
In consolidated authoritarianism terms, we're doing pretty well, as the regime is haphazard, meeting resistance, and growing increasingly unpopular.
Depends on one's perspective. I started using the latter standard in Jan.
We’re already hearing about Watergate level crimes every week. Imagine what will come out after it’s over.
We’re going to need a full accounting of all that’s been done in violation of the constitution.
Trump envoy Witkoff negotiated it, details and threats to Ukraine were public for multiple days, and Rubio didn't dispute it then, only after the plan got a bad reception and rejected by Europe.
Look like attempting to save face.
Trump envoy Witkoff negotiated it, details and threats to Ukraine were public for multiple days, and Rubio didn't dispute it then, only after the plan got a bad reception and rejected by Europe.
Look like attempting to save face.
After a year of the U.S. president leaning harder on Zelenskyy than Putin, Washington was unlikely to conduct a real pressure campaign against Moscow.
After a year of the U.S. president leaning harder on Zelenskyy than Putin, Washington was unlikely to conduct a real pressure campaign against Moscow.
Various lawyers wouldn’t sign off on it because the orders are illegal.
Trump flipped out at veterans saying don’t follow illegal orders because he’s giving illegal orders.
Real Occam’s razor situation here.
It's hard for USGs to claim ‘mistake of law’ or ‘advice of counsel’ – when they’re firing lawyers who wouldn't sign off on the strikes.
WaPo's new revelations on firings or removals:
1) CIA General Counsel
2) NSC Legal Adviser
3) CIA Mission Center’s lawyer
🧵
Various lawyers wouldn’t sign off on it because the orders are illegal.
Trump flipped out at veterans saying don’t follow illegal orders because he’s giving illegal orders.
Real Occam’s razor situation here.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Me in @ms.now:
Shouldn't appeal to anyone, but apparently does to some.
Shouldn't appeal to anyone, but apparently does to some.
Read @donmoyn.bsky.social on Trump corrupting the FBI
Read @donmoyn.bsky.social on Trump corrupting the FBI
I guess I doubt she or any Republican would do that, so I'll take early resignation and the wedge that pushes on.
I guess I doubt she or any Republican would do that, so I'll take early resignation and the wedge that pushes on.
#Holdfast
#Holdfast
MAMDANI: I've spoken about--
TRUMP: That's okay. You can just say yes. I don't mind.
MAMDANI: I've spoken about--
TRUMP: That's okay. You can just say yes. I don't mind.
"I will be resigning from office with my last day being January 5, 2026”