chesslaw1.bsky.social
@chesslaw1.bsky.social
Here's the complaint. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
#1 in United States v. SEALED (S.D. Tex., 5:26-mj-00460) – CourtListener.com
COMPLAINT as to Andres Wilkinson, III (1), filed. (vm5) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/11/2026: # 1 Complaint unredacted) (akp5). (Entered: 02/09/2026)
storage.courtlistener.com
February 13, 2026 at 2:37 AM
Here's the complaint. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Also, the power to increase the franchise doesn't necessarily imply the power to take it away.
Any effort to prohibit voting by someone authorized under the Constitution (e.g. if Congress tried to stop someone qualified to vote in a state) would seemingly run afoul of U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton.
Any effort to prohibit voting by someone authorized under the Constitution (e.g. if Congress tried to stop someone qualified to vote in a state) would seemingly run afoul of U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton.
{{meta.pageTitle}}
{{meta.description}}
www.oyez.org
February 13, 2026 at 2:30 AM
Also, the power to increase the franchise doesn't necessarily imply the power to take it away.
Any effort to prohibit voting by someone authorized under the Constitution (e.g. if Congress tried to stop someone qualified to vote in a state) would seemingly run afoul of U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton.
Any effort to prohibit voting by someone authorized under the Constitution (e.g. if Congress tried to stop someone qualified to vote in a state) would seemingly run afoul of U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton.
Isn't this application the equivalent to an affidavit alleging that someone was driving and that the driving is unlawful *if* the driver had no license, but without alleging any facts about the existence of license?
February 11, 2026 at 8:07 PM
Isn't this application the equivalent to an affidavit alleging that someone was driving and that the driving is unlawful *if* the driver had no license, but without alleging any facts about the existence of license?
Was the motorcycle upright when it landed?
February 8, 2026 at 3:24 PM
Was the motorcycle upright when it landed?
Any worse than the 3rd including the US Virgin Islands?
February 5, 2026 at 6:43 PM
Any worse than the 3rd including the US Virgin Islands?
And based on a quick skim, the Board doesn't even have to vote. So there is essentially no right to appeal at all (the single Board member who reviews the case only has the power to dismiss, not to grant review).
February 5, 2026 at 3:20 PM
And based on a quick skim, the Board doesn't even have to vote. So there is essentially no right to appeal at all (the single Board member who reviews the case only has the power to dismiss, not to grant review).
The lack of notice and comment here seems vulnerable to a challenge.
February 5, 2026 at 3:04 PM
The lack of notice and comment here seems vulnerable to a challenge.
Not too far from Turkey Hill and the Watch & Clock museum (inscription over gift shop: Yours, Mine & Hours).
February 5, 2026 at 3:32 AM
Not too far from Turkey Hill and the Watch & Clock museum (inscription over gift shop: Yours, Mine & Hours).
Can they demand them for a retaliatory reason?
It’s I-9 records, they can demand it.
I suspect it’ll turn out the Angolan man was an asylum seeker with a valid work permit, nothing legally stopping him from doing the job.
I suspect it’ll turn out the Angolan man was an asylum seeker with a valid work permit, nothing legally stopping him from doing the job.
February 4, 2026 at 5:09 AM
Can they demand them for a retaliatory reason?
I think some (many?) of the MN habeas cases have included language allowing fee motions as well:
bsky.app/profile/kyle...
bsky.app/profile/kyle...
Minnesota courts have been inundated with these cases since the beginning of Operation Metro Surge last month. Here's a ruling by Judge Bryan from yesterday, freeing a man who as detained after living in the US for 20 years with no criminal record. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
February 3, 2026 at 3:55 PM
I think some (many?) of the MN habeas cases have included language allowing fee motions as well:
bsky.app/profile/kyle...
bsky.app/profile/kyle...
My 1L summer, I sat in on a trial in a case brought by a prisoner (I think the claims were based on injuries from a cell extraction). The video was missing the key time when he got hurt The jury returned a very large verdict given the context (possibly low 6 figures, but I don't recall exactly).
January 26, 2026 at 1:29 AM
My 1L summer, I sat in on a trial in a case brought by a prisoner (I think the claims were based on injuries from a cell extraction). The video was missing the key time when he got hurt The jury returned a very large verdict given the context (possibly low 6 figures, but I don't recall exactly).
Are they entitled to bond hearings?
January 23, 2026 at 8:48 PM
Are they entitled to bond hearings?
Even with an administrative warrant, isn't a final order of removal a civil remedy?
January 22, 2026 at 12:54 AM
Even with an administrative warrant, isn't a final order of removal a civil remedy?
Did Lucky Star go to Philly?
January 20, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Did Lucky Star go to Philly?
The 2007 article also mentioned: "Fung Wah has had problems before. A fire on a Connecticut highway in 2005 prompted police to pull over the burning bus."
January 20, 2026 at 5:57 PM
The 2007 article also mentioned: "Fung Wah has had problems before. A fire on a Connecticut highway in 2005 prompted police to pull over the burning bus."
The list of Fung Wah incidents is remarkable -- like the bus that lost wheels on the MA turnpike. (web.archive.org/web/20070613...)
Fung Wah Bus Loses Wheels - News Story - WCVB Boston
Fung Wah Bus Loses Wheels
web.archive.org
January 20, 2026 at 5:48 PM
The list of Fung Wah incidents is remarkable -- like the bus that lost wheels on the MA turnpike. (web.archive.org/web/20070613...)
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social I notice that they don't claim that he refused to provide ID, which could suggest that they had information demonstrating that he wasn't a person they were looking for.
January 19, 2026 at 7:24 PM
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social I notice that they don't claim that he refused to provide ID, which could suggest that they had information demonstrating that he wasn't a person they were looking for.
His family alleges that the redetention was on direct orders from the WH.
www.kare11.com/article/news...
www.kare11.com/article/news...
January 18, 2026 at 3:20 AM
His family alleges that the redetention was on direct orders from the WH.
www.kare11.com/article/news...
www.kare11.com/article/news...
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social Did you see the follow up? ICE redetained him yesterday at a check-in. And the court amended its habeas grant to prevent rearrest w/out following the regs re: revocation of orders of supervision.
www.fox9.com/news/garriso...
ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/1011113...
www.fox9.com/news/garriso...
ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/1011113...
January 18, 2026 at 3:16 AM
@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social Did you see the follow up? ICE redetained him yesterday at a check-in. And the court amended its habeas grant to prevent rearrest w/out following the regs re: revocation of orders of supervision.
www.fox9.com/news/garriso...
ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/1011113...
www.fox9.com/news/garriso...
ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/doc1/1011113...
Abba Eban (in his autobiography) said that Lord Halifax was “a man of principle, but one of his principles was expediency.”
www.wrmea.org/2003-january...
www.wrmea.org/2003-january...
January 18, 2026 at 2:18 AM
Abba Eban (in his autobiography) said that Lord Halifax was “a man of principle, but one of his principles was expediency.”
www.wrmea.org/2003-january...
www.wrmea.org/2003-january...
I defer to your expertise there. It's logical that there *should* be for data that was taken in violation of the Fourth Amendment's requirements, but I haven't had occasion to look into it.
January 16, 2026 at 4:34 AM
I defer to your expertise there. It's logical that there *should* be for data that was taken in violation of the Fourth Amendment's requirements, but I haven't had occasion to look into it.
Obviously Lyons requires showing a likelihood of injury now, but that seems somewhat easier when the remedy sought is deletion of information still in the gov't's possession (though not without potential pitfalls).
January 16, 2026 at 4:29 AM
Obviously Lyons requires showing a likelihood of injury now, but that seems somewhat easier when the remedy sought is deletion of information still in the gov't's possession (though not without potential pitfalls).
Arguably this should be easier on the assumption that the government still has your personal biometric information that it can be ordered to delete, which is different from Lyons. The case law on standing under BIPA (the Illinois biometric privacy law) could make that a bit trickier though. /cont.
January 16, 2026 at 4:28 AM
Arguably this should be easier on the assumption that the government still has your personal biometric information that it can be ordered to delete, which is different from Lyons. The case law on standing under BIPA (the Illinois biometric privacy law) could make that a bit trickier though. /cont.
What about a suit for injunctive relief to delete any records of the photo?
January 16, 2026 at 4:07 AM
What about a suit for injunctive relief to delete any records of the photo?
I am deeply amused that he says that when you buy something, you "look at the Consumer's Report."
Which represents the opinions of . . . experts in product testing.
Which represents the opinions of . . . experts in product testing.
HHS Secretary RFK Jr: "This idea that you should trust the experts, a good mother doesn't do that"
January 15, 2026 at 11:37 PM