Energy systems modeling, economics, policy | IPCC, NCA, Stanford/CMU alum | Views my own
Reposted by John Bistline
For details from the USGS:
Reposted by John Bistline
For details from the USGS:
1. Planning
2. Rate design and cost allocation (avoid cost shifting)
3. Demand flexibility
Read the white paper here: winwin.epri.com
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
📉 U.S. coal production: ~884M tons (1985) → ~513M (2024)
📉 Coal mining employment: ~174k (1985) → ~43k (2024)
Automation meant jobs fell faster than production.
For scale, Tesla has ~120k U.S. employees... ~3x the mining workforce.
Reposted by Rebecca Solnit, John R. Hutchinson, Cailin O’Connor
Reposted by John Bistline
To hit net-zero by 2050, the pace of decarbonization would need to roughly triple.
We're now closer to 2050 than the first season of Survivor.
Here's the 2025 update: iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...
Reposted by Daniel Huppmann, Hisham Zerriffi
This is similar to Zheng et al.: Even >3x interregional transmission only cuts costs of a zero-emissions 2050 system by ~7% (lots of substitutes: storage, siting, nuclear). Reliability benefits can be larger than pure $ savings: arxiv.org/abs/2402.14189
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Reposted by Peter Thorne
Electrifying a car-dependent city still means congestion, space, safety risk, and asphalt eating your budget.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
h/t my colleague Erik Smith for the analysis: 2025 temps from GFS 06z, 1975-2024 from ERA5, area-weighted (lat) and averaged over the CONUS.
The EMF 37 study also discusses opportunities and challenges in this space: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Reposted by Leah Stokes
Reposted by Paul Lehmann, Juan Cole, Paul Nightingale
Grid: "Please hold. Your call is very important to us. Estimated wait time... 8 to 12 years."