bibliometraf.bsky.social
@bibliometraf.bsky.social
Ya está aquí el Ranking de Leiden.
leidenranking.com
Dos ediciones, una basada en Web of Science y otra en OpenAlex.
CWTS Leiden Ranking
The CWTS Leiden Ranking offers important insights into the scientific performance for major universities worldwide. Select your preferred indicators, generate results, and explore the performance of u...
leidenranking.com
October 29, 2025 at 2:34 PM
¿Pueden los LLM evaluar la calidad de la investigación?

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
arxiv.org/abs/2508.07196
Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
Although both Google Gemini (1.5 Flash) and ChatGPT (4o and 4o-mini) give research quality evaluation scores that correlate positively with expert scores in nearly all fields, and more strongly that c...
arxiv.org
August 18, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Reposted
Por mucho que los antivacunas se empeñen o cuando consiguen que al frente de la sanidad de un país como EEUU esté un antivacunas como Robert Kennedy, NO, las evidencias científicas siguen diciendo que NO, que las vacunas no tienen que ver con el autismo.
theconversation.com/no-las-vacun...
No, las vacunas no son la causa del autismo
Aunque el bulo aún circula, nuevas evidencias siguen descartando la relación entre las inmunizaciones infantiles y el trastorno del espectro autista.
theconversation.com
July 18, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Reposted
#Dinamarca busca defender el rostro, la voz y el cuerpo de sus ciudadanos a través de un peculiar «copyright». Ello, a través de una ley pionera en el mundo que no sólo busca reconocer los derechos de las personas sobre su voz o su imagen, sino también protegerlas de los «deepfake» y la IA
July 18, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Artículo que compara la extracción de datos por una herramienta de IA (Elicit) con la realizada por revisores humanos.

Data Extractions Using a Large Language Model (Elicit) and Human Reviewers in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Comparison

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
Data Extractions Using a Large Language Model (Elicit) and Human Reviewers in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Comparison
Aim We aimed at comparing data extractions from randomized controlled trials by using Elicit and human reviewers. Background Elicit is an artificial intelligence tool which may automate specific s...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
June 17, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Reposted
"This serves to increase transparency and (we hope) to build trust in the scientific process."

I'm pretty sceptical about the relationship between transparency and trust, and the fact that one is often seen as a replacement of the other, but this is still a welcome development for metaresearchers.
June 16, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Reposted
How similar are field-normalized citation impact scores obtained from OpenAlex and three popular commercial databases? An empirical comparison based on large German universities.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
How similar are field-normalized citation impact scores obtained from OpenAlex and three popular commercial databases? An empirical comparison based on large German universities - Scientometrics
OpenAlex is a freely available bibliographic database that can be used for bibliometric studies. In this study, we compared certain field-normalized citation scores (NCS) from OpenAlex with those from...
link.springer.com
May 30, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Reposted
#TalDíaComoHoy en 1898, nace Felisa Martín Bravo. Primera doctora en física de España, primera mujer en ingresar en el Cuerpo Superior de Meteorología y primera mujer investigadora del Laboratorio de Investigaciones Físicas (LIF).

#WomenInSTEM
June 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM
Reposted
He firmado la solicitud enviada por profesionales de bibliotecas a @ernesturtasun.bsky.social y @crueuniversidades.bsky.social para rescindir el contrato con #ExLibris (sistema Alma), con sede en territorio ocupado. Se adjunta mensaje difundido en IWETEL. #bibliotecas #ética #PalestinaLibre
June 3, 2025 at 6:03 AM
How similar are field-normalized citation impact scores obtained from OpenAlex and three popular commercial databases? An empirical comparison based on large German universities.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
How similar are field-normalized citation impact scores obtained from OpenAlex and three popular commercial databases? An empirical comparison based on large German universities - Scientometrics
OpenAlex is a freely available bibliographic database that can be used for bibliometric studies. In this study, we compared certain field-normalized citation scores (NCS) from OpenAlex with those from...
link.springer.com
May 30, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Reposted
[Blogged] Generalization bias in large language model summarization of scientific research royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/.... They measured 3 types of generalizations, see screenshot (1) to see if LLM summarises were more prone to that compared to original abstracts. (1)
May 27, 2025 at 7:15 AM
Cómo Google Scholar transformó la investigación.
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
May 16, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted
El estereotipo de cientifica/o en chavales de 14/16
May 16, 2025 at 8:17 AM
Monólogos con Ciencia.

www.unavarra.es/monologos-up...
May 15, 2025 at 11:16 AM
Reposted
Grandola vila more e na
April 25, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Reposted
Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Improving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial
Objective To evaluate the impact of adding librarians and information specialists (LIS) as methodological peer reviewers to the formal journal peer review process on the quality of search reporting an...
ebm.bmj.com
March 18, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Reposted
Cómo revisar, mejorar y depurar de errores tu perfil público en Google Scholar. Disponible en el repositorio de la UPF una guía que publicamos junto con Lopezosa (UB) y Rovira (UPF) > Google Scholar: SEO académico y curación de contenidos: una guía para autores
repositori.upf.edu/items/fea5b5...
February 25, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Reposted
Que las niñas estudien lo que quieran, pero si deciden ser científicas, que encuentren un camino más amigable, con menos obstáculos y respetuoso donde puedan llegar hasta donde se propongan. ¡Feliz día a mis compañeras y a las futuras científicas! 🧑🏻‍🔬
#DiaMujerYNinaEnCiencia #11F
February 11, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Reposted
Nosotras también investigamos #11F @uib.cat
February 11, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Reposted
On #InternationalDayofWomenandGirlsinScience let me remind you that we are NOWHERE NEAR parity. A few examples.

1. Women are credited less in science than men.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Women are credited less in science than men - Nature
The difference between the number of men and women listed as authors on scientific papers and inventors on patents is at least partly attributable to unacknowledged contributions by women scientists.
www.nature.com
February 11, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Reposted
If this isn't enough, male academics accused of harassment and bullying easily find new positions elsewhere, and around the world, far-right, anti-science governments are breaking down any progress made. We must stand up for an inclusive and diverse science!
February 11, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Echamos en falta algunas indicaciones sobre incluir el nombre de pila completo en vez de las iniciales en las firmas y en las referencias bibliográficas. Es una forma de hacer evidente el trabajo de mujeres científicas.
“Lancet seguirá recomendando el uso de lenguaje inclusivo, aceptando la elección final de terminología por parte de los autores cuando sea científicamente precisa y respetuosa, y animándoles a seguir las directrices de presentación de informes de Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER)”.
🆕 The Lancet Group’s editorial statement in response to recent US executive orders (February 10th, 2025): www.thelancet.com/editorial-po...
February 12, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Reposted
🆕 The Lancet Group’s editorial statement in response to recent US executive orders (February 10th, 2025): www.thelancet.com/editorial-po...
Editorial policies
www.thelancet.com
February 11, 2025 at 6:39 PM