Sven De Maeyer
svawa.bsky.social
Sven De Maeyer
@svawa.bsky.social

🎓 Professor statistics and measurement in education at #UAntwerpen
💡 Interest in Education for Sustainable Development, Bayesian analyses, Comparative Judgement, Reproducibility, and Open Science
💻 living in the #tidyverse at #R loving #brms .. more

Education 61%
Psychology 15%
Pinned
For those interested I very inregularly blog and share workshop materials here on #Rstats #brms #bayesian

👉 sdemaeyer.quarto.pub
– Sven De Maeyer
sdemaeyer.quarto.pub

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

I'm just posting it because it's never been posted on Bluesky before ...
doi.org/10.1111/jeb....
Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation
Abstract. A paradigm shift away from null hypothesis significance testing seems in progress. Based on simulations, we illustrate some of the underlying mot
doi.org

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Generally not a fan of Nicholas Kristof but he's a sound person to track the deaths that Elon claims haven't occurred on his watch.

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
apache/ @apache.be · Mar 15
“In de stad schuilt een ander soort democratische politiek die meer aandacht verdient”, stelt socioloog @stijnoosterlynck.bsky.social.

Oosterlynck laat de stem van de stad vandaag horen in de twintigste Paul Verbraekenlezing.
Socioloog Stijn Oosterlynck: “De stad wijst ons de weg”
De socioloog zoekt voor zijn Paul Verbraekenlezing in de stad naar een democratische toekomst.
apache.be

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

🏆 Research integrity consultant and image forensics expert @elisabethbik.bsky.social has uncovered fraudulent data in over 7,600 scientific papers and exposed the practices of ‘paper mills’ that produce counterfeit scientific articles. She is honoured with the €200K Individual Award. Congrats!

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Reposted by David Gijbels

Happy to share our new article on motivation of adult learners in second-chance education with @beamertens.bsky.social

We used an audit-trail to meet some open science principles!

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

#open-access #L&I #QualitativeResearch #OpenSciene #OSF
Unraveling low-educated adults' motivation for second-chance education: A multidimensional perspective
Low-educated adults' participation in second-chance education (SCE) is often implicitly imposed, as an ISCED level 3 degree is required to have access…
www.sciencedirect.com

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

#TodayinHistory #dataviz #OTD 📊
💀Feb 23, 1855 Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss died in Göttingen, Germany 🇩🇪

In 1821 he proved least squares as best linear unbiased estimator& illustrated this with data on the French meridian arcs, from Dunkirk to Barcelona.
Scientific problems stimulated discoveries

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Check out "A Layering of Selves: Bias, Subjectivity, and Paper Dolls," a more #creative and #fun way for #qualitative #students to explore #subjectivity, #positionality, & #bias. FREE access:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... #highered #research #PhDSky #AcademicSky #HigherEdSky #methodology
New blog post!

Sometimes, when reviewing a manuscript, it's really unclear to me what precisely the authors are trying to do -- which makes it hard to evaluate the work properly.

So, here's some advice for how to ensure that readers don't get lost.
www.the100.ci/2025/02/17/r...
Reviewer notes: Avoid any ambiguity about analysis aims
For any central statistical analysis that you report in your manuscript, it should be absolutely clear for readers why the analysis is being conducted in the first place – that is, the analysis goal s...
www.the100.ci

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

“Curry’s letter describes “an assault on scientific research…huge cuts in funding & regime of censorship (particularly with regard to equity, diversity & inclusion & climate) that is a direct threat to freedom of expression & academic freedom. These actions contravene the society’s code of conduct”
Royal Society will meet amid campaign to revoke Elon Musk’s fellowship
More than 1,300 scientists have signed a letter calling on the world’s oldest science society to reassess the billionaire’s membership following cuts to US science.
www.nature.com

Isn’t pivot_longer doing the job?

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

🎙️ De Staat van ons Onderwijs over Zelfregulerend leren
Hoe ondersteun je als docent studenten bij hun zelfregulerend leren? Ik spreek met Sabrina Govaerts & Astrid Koelman (Kenniscentrum OLLI, AP Hogeschool) over hun tool voor docenten HO.
🎧 Luister hier: www.mixcloud.com/peter-vp/de-...
De Staat Van Ons Onderwijs Over Zelfregulerend Leren In Het Hoger Onderwijs
www.mixcloud.com

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

I#LoveMethodsWeek25 is happening this year! We are hosting a workshop!
Sign up for our workshop here: https://buff.ly/40SG1Jn
Check out other events here: https://buff.ly/40Axc5u

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Which findings should we replicate? Isager et al propose a 'replication value', defined as the maximum expected utility gain when conducting a replication. It is a function of (1) the value of being certain about the claim, and (2) uncertainty about the claim. osf.io/preprints/me...

Very interesting paper on the double-blind peer-review system!

I am curious about your thoughts on this topic
🔍 Is double-blind peer review really the gold standard for scientific integrity? Christopher Mebane argues it may actually obscure bias and data, risking the rigor of research. Transparency, he claims, is key to safeguarding science. 🧪 #ScienceIntegrity #PeerReview

doi.org/10.1093/etoj...
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity
Abstract. I make six arguments for why double-blind peer review practices increase vulnerability to scientific integrity lapses over more transparent peer
doi.org

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

🔍 Is double-blind peer review really the gold standard for scientific integrity? Christopher Mebane argues it may actually obscure bias and data, risking the rigor of research. Transparency, he claims, is key to safeguarding science. 🧪 #ScienceIntegrity #PeerReview

doi.org/10.1093/etoj...
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity
Abstract. I make six arguments for why double-blind peer review practices increase vulnerability to scientific integrity lapses over more transparent peer
doi.org

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

You may have heard of Questionable Research Practices and "HARKing" as threats to replicability.

In a new paper led by @sakshighai.bsky.social, we argue that a similar practices -- Questionable Generalizability Practices and "MASKing" -- undermine generalizability.

www.nature.com/articles/s44...

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

Today, the RDNL consortium launches a 4-year project to create a training platform that will strengthen the NL community of data stewards. Open Science NL has granted 4.8 million euros for the development of the platform: www.openscience.nl/en/news/rdnl...
RDNL consortium to work on training platform for data professionals | Open Science NL
Over the next four years, the Research Data Netherlands (RDNL) consortium will both strengthen the profession of data professionals in the Netherlands and expand their skills and competences. To this ...
www.openscience.nl
Three Myths About Statistical Power

🔹️ Myth 1: Power is an objective feature

🔹️ Myth 2: With low power comes low credibility

🔹️ Myth 3: High power protects against questionable research practices

BSky author: @clauslamm.bsky.social
Powerful Myths: Common Misconceptions About Statistical Power
Lukas Lengersdorff and Claus Lamm discuss three misconceptions that stand in the way of an informed discussion.
www.psychologicalscience.org

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

New on the tidyverse blog: reflecting on 3 LLM-based tools I've worked on recently to aid my work on #rstats packages and data science projects🤖

www.tidyverse.org/blog/2025/01...
Three experiments in LLM code assist with RStudio and Positron - Tidyverse
We've been experimenting with LLM-powered tools to streamline R data science and package development.
www.tidyverse.org

I think this assumption of infinite populations is not in there. In your model you can assume variation between stimuli regardless of there is a finite or infinite population of stimuli. I might be wrong of course. Moreover, inference works different there, not relying on estimated standard errors

What would happen in the Bayesian realm? To be clear, I do not know myself nor did I wrap my head around it. Just a spontaneous thought.

Zeer boeiende bijdrage. Heb hier opnieuw wat uit opgestoken.

Reposted by Sven De Mæyer

🌍 Hoe maak je jongeren weerbaar tegen klimaat-nepnieuws? In deze aflevering van 'De Staat van ons Onderwijs' bespreek ik met Leen Bisschop #OdiseeHogeschool hoe wetenschappelijke geletterdheid en reflectieve dialogen jongeren helpen kritisch te denken.
🎧 Luister nu!
www.mixcloud.com/peter-vp/de-...
De Staat Van Ons Onderwijs Over Weerbaarheid Tegenover Nepnieuws Over Klimaatverandering
www.mixcloud.com