Michael Lister
banner
michaellister.bsky.social
Michael Lister
@michaellister.bsky.social

Politics, Oxford Brookes University. Researching security, terrorism, counterterrorism, public opinion

Political science 40%
Sociology 20%

Reposted by Lee Jarvis

A real pleasure to work with @leejarvis.bsky.social @akinoyawale.bsky.social, the @secdialogue.bsky.social editorial team and all the excellent contributors to this volume: Joseph Downing, Nicole George, Sarai B. Aharoni, Amalia Sa’ar, @bohdanakurylo.bsky.social, Nick Vaughan-Williams & Hannah Owens
Out now! A new special issue from @secdialogue.bsky.social with an excellent line-up of contributors to mark 20 years of vernacular security research! Guest edited by @leejarvis.bsky.social @michaellister.bsky.social & Akinyemi Oyawale journals.sagepub.com/toc/SDI/curr...
Out now! A new special issue from @secdialogue.bsky.social with an excellent line-up of contributors to mark 20 years of vernacular security research! Guest edited by @leejarvis.bsky.social @michaellister.bsky.social & Akinyemi Oyawale journals.sagepub.com/toc/SDI/curr...

Sure. I completely agree-it’s hideous and horrendous. And it needs all the pushback it deserves, moral and practical

They should also be asking basic questions about costs & economic impact. Aside from the hideous morality, this stuff is fairytale (nightmare) politics. If someone of the left proposed free laptops for all, they’d be immediately asked where the money comes from. This stuff should be no different

Reposted by Michael Lister

Although many of these people are clearly insane we do need to do more than laugh at the idiocy of these proposals, and point out they aren't just a bit of fun but nasty and likely to be massively damaging to our economy and way of life.

Reposted by Michael Lister

New publication from PAIS' Akinyemi Oyawale!

Akin, with Prof. Lee Jarvis (University of Adelaide) and Prof. Michael Lister (Oxford Brookes), examines vernacular security in Security Dialogue.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Reposted by Michael Lister

New article just published in the Journal of Global Security Studies on different critical strategies within vernacular discourse on security. The article's open access and free to read here academic.oup.com/jogss/articl...

Reposted by Michael Lister

So pleased to see the introduction to our special issue on #vernacularsecurity published in Security Dialogue! Coauthored with @michaellister.bsky.social & Akin Oyawale, the issue pushes vernacular security research into exciting new directions. Free to read here journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

* I guess if we’re being technical, Farage massively exacerbated the economic malaise, which dates back (at least) to the financial crisis. But the fundamental point is that no Brexit equals a relatively better economy

Completely agree Alex. But there’s also something weird and twisted that the reason so many people are up for the fascism thing that Farage is selling, is the economic malaise that Farage himself has caused via Brexit.

Reposted by Michael Lister

Thrilled to have a chapter in this new book, now published with @manchesterup.bsky.social. My chapter with @michaellister.bsky.social looks at UK security policies and priorities, including in relation to COVID, terrorism, and austerity.

Reposted by Michael Lister

New article in @politicalquarterly.bsky.social w/ @michaellister.bsky.social & @apowelllaw.bsky.social on the naming of laws after exemplary victims of injustice. While opening space for addressing harm, such laws also, we argue, pose political & legal risks: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Great, balanced @politicalquarterly.bsky.social essay on the unhappy rise of laws named after victims onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

Great working with @apowelllaw.bsky.social and @leejarvis.bsky.social on this piece about the increasing prevalence of naming laws after specific people. Open Access at the link 👇
New Publication with @leejarvis.bsky.social and @michaellister.bsky.social outlining the phenomenon that we have dubbed 'nominative laws'. The Article is available Open Access via the link below.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Stop in the Law of the Name! Nominative Lawmaking, Populism and Justice
Nominative laws—laws named after particular victims of violence or injustice such as Martyn's Law, Sarah's Law and Awaab's Law—have become increasingly prominent in the UK. In this article, we offer ...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Reposted by Michael Lister

After that Government (Partygate! Truss!!!) and that campaign, (D-Day????) you could even say winning under 34% of the vote is not exactly god-like genius…

Reposted by Michael Lister

Really enjoyed working with @leejarvis.bsky.social and @apowelllaw.bsky.social on this. Full article in @politicalquarterly.bsky.social soon!

Reposted by Michael Lister

Why do we see laws being named after victims of tragedy or crime? And why it might matter socially and politically? New piece with @michaellister.bsky.social & Alex Powell previews a forthcoming article in @politicalquarterly.bsky.social: politicalquarterly.org.uk/blog/stop-in...
Stop in the Law of the Name! Nominative Lawmaking, Populism, and Justice
Naming of a law after a person – nominative lawmaking - appears to be something of a growing trend in the UK.
politicalquarterly.org.uk

🎯
Just out in @secdialogue.bsky.social

My new article, "From individual to collective: Vernacular security and #Ukrainian civil society in wartime" - part of the special issue on the 20th anniversary of #VernacularSecurity

doi.org/10.1177/0967...

Reposted by Michael Lister

1/3. We're excited to announce the publication of our latest article: "Security Professionals and Public Opinion: Legitimacy, Publicity, and Brand Identity", by Michael Lister!
@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social
@sagepub.com

Based on interviews with UK counterterrorism security professionals it argues that public opinion does matter for such “securocrats”, albeit in different ways for public and private actors. It draws from a wider project covered in my recent book:
www.routledge.com/Public-Opini... (2/2)
Public Opinion and Counter-Terrorism: Security and Politics in the UK
This book examines the ways in which the views of the public inhabit the counter-terrorism policy space, with a focus on the UK case. Drawing insights from Critical Terrorism Studies, Critical Securi...
www.routledge.com

My new article is out in @journalpolitics.bsky.social. “Security professionals and public opinion: legitimacy, publicity and brand identity”. It looks at the ways in which non elected security professionals, think about public opinion. Open access (1/2)

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
journals.sagepub.com

Reposted by Michael Lister

In our latest issue, Chris Hesketh elucidates on the concept of ‘coloniality of space’ in the context of Latin America. It's #OpenAccess and free to read!

📄 👉 buff.ly/UcyGmZk
Groups like Al Qaeda used to be the antithesis of older terrorisms like the IRA. Now they're often seen as equivalent. What's going on with our temporal imaginaries of terrorism? And why does it matter? New
E-IR piece w/ Andrew Whiting & @michaellister.bsky.social: www.e-ir.info/2025/01/29/r...
Reflecting on Terrorism’s Temporalities After the Southport Attacks
The question over what ‘terrorism’ means has divided and confounded researchers, as well as policymakers and citizens, since the term’s emergence.
www.e-ir.info

You can see this in the different ways in UK & US debates which periodise contemporary terrorism differently-as new in the UK but as connected to older violences in the US-to mobilise support for different counterterrorism agendas. (end)

So what’s going on here? We argue that attempts to periodise terrorism-as old, or new-represent political attempts to mobilise terrorism’s pasts and presents in order to support particular projects, causes and goals. (4/n)

For scholars of terrorism this forces a double take. In the early 2000s Al-Qaeda were seen as representatives of a new kind of terrorism, but one that was underpinned by *non*-political aims and *fragmented* organisation-the very opposite of the characteristics imputed by Starmer. (3/n)