Jordi Cat
jordicat.bsky.social
Jordi Cat
@jordicat.bsky.social

science, philosophy, history, politics, art and so much else

Philosophy 35%
History 20%

Especially in a war, as opposed to a debate.

Looks like (1) is the data model and (2) is the hypothesis that calls for more indep testing and explanation.
Obituaries reveal shifting cultural values across time and place. Here’s what psychology researchers found when they sifted through 38 million published from 1998 to 2024 buff.ly/oTAueW7
What 38 million obituaries reveal about how Americans define a ‘life well lived’
Obituaries reveal shifting cultural values across time and place. Here’s a glimpse into how the moral vocabulary has evolved over several decades.
theconversation.com

Do zombies count as boundary systems?

The missing episode of Netflix's House of Guinness reason.com/2025/12/01/o...
Rethinking statistical significance
From medicine to economics, significance testing misleads. Estimation offers a clearer way forward.
reason.com

AI-powered Netflix.edu

Reposted by John Hogan, Jordi Cat

“We are sold the myth that the language of legality is preferable to the language of morality because it is impartial and fixed. But as this whole dispute makes plain, that is least apt to be true precisely when it matters most.”

Joseph Margulies on Trump’s murders in the Caribbean:
The Moral Stupefaction of the American Public - Boston Review
Trump’s actions are illegal, yes. Worse than that, they are wrong—precisely what the legality debate is meant to obscure.
www.bostonreview.net

the current (ant)political-(anti)legal regime is predicated on the presidential power of pardon.
🎥 Watch the Lakatos Award Lecture 2025 by Mazviita Chirimuuta on "Apocalyptic Technology: #AI and the Limits of #Science"

Mazviita Chirimuuta received the award for her book “The Brain Abstracted: Simplification in the History and Philosophy of Neuroscience”

www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KkX...
Mazviita Chirimuuta (University of Edinburgh): Apocalyptic Technology: AI and the Limits of Science
YouTube video by LSE Philosophy
www.youtube.com

The cave was a mine.

Relying on ChatGPT to teach you about a topic leaves you with shallower knowledge than Googling and reading about it, according to new research that compared what more than 10,000 people knew after using one method or the other.

Shared by @gizmodo.com: buff.ly/yAAHtHq

We are deep in Girardian territory.
Alexei ❤️
Just published: our introduction to the history of peer review in the humanities! (with Marie-Gabrielle Verbergt) link.springer.com/article/10.1...
The Past and Present of Peer Review in the Humanities: An Introduction - Minerva
This Introduction to the Special Issue “The Past and Present of Peer Review in the Humanities” situates the currently dominant evaluative regime of peer review within a longer and broader history of s...
link.springer.com

Reposted by Jordi Cat

While AI earbuds promise to eliminate language barriers for tourists, researchers say true language learning offers far more: creative thinking, deeper cultural understanding and access to communities you can't reach through a translator.
What AI earbuds can’t replace: The value of learning another language
AI-fueled technologies make communicating in other languages easier than ever, but it still can’t replace the transformative value of learning a new language.
buff.ly

Blackmail

What significant aspects of it will be declared automatable and be automated?

Valuing vs value. Sometimes shared valuing is more valuable than a shared value.

Participants in private scientific and technological collaborations? Or more indirectly in philanthropic institutions indirectly funded through industry profit?

Can science study fields –e.g., history, philosophy, sociology and anthropology of science– only survive attached to privatized science and technology research?

Science research is increasingly privatized, especially away from academic settings. What does it mean for the survival of research in the humanities, especially within academia? At the mercy of private funding and no less discretionary government interests? Can it survive outside academia at all?