Vote NO on proposals 2, 3, and 4 - a real estate developer's Trojan Horse.
Proposals 2-4 sound nice, but they're actually a massive giveaway to real estate developers - expediting our community's displacement.
Video: youth_against_displacement on IG
#nycvotes #ballotprops #ballotquestions
Proposals 2-4 sound nice, but they're actually a massive giveaway to real estate developers - expediting our community's displacement.
Video: youth_against_displacement on IG
#nycvotes #ballotprops #ballotquestions
October 26, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Vote NO on proposals 2, 3, and 4 - a real estate developer's Trojan Horse.
Proposals 2-4 sound nice, but they're actually a massive giveaway to real estate developers - expediting our community's displacement.
Video: youth_against_displacement on IG
#nycvotes #ballotprops #ballotquestions
Proposals 2-4 sound nice, but they're actually a massive giveaway to real estate developers - expediting our community's displacement.
Video: youth_against_displacement on IG
#nycvotes #ballotprops #ballotquestions
(As an aside, I was surprised to see that the vast majority of Lancaster voters are not enrolled in a party - like me, keeping their options open to pick the best candidate for the job. This matters a lot in primaries.)
#democracy #candidates #ballotquestions #electionworkers #vote
#democracy #candidates #ballotquestions #electionworkers #vote
May 6, 2025 at 2:21 PM
(As an aside, I was surprised to see that the vast majority of Lancaster voters are not enrolled in a party - like me, keeping their options open to pick the best candidate for the job. This matters a lot in primaries.)
#democracy #candidates #ballotquestions #electionworkers #vote
#democracy #candidates #ballotquestions #electionworkers #vote
Letters to the Editor
Vote YES for 300 and 301 For the sake of our wildlife and future quality of life, please vote YES for ballotquestions 300 and 301. Every survey of visitors or town residents shows that a major reason for coming here or living here is the wildlife, particularly the elk and…
Vote YES for 300 and 301 For the sake of our wildlife and future quality of life, please vote YES for ballotquestions 300 and 301. Every survey of visitors or town residents shows that a major reason for coming here or living here is the wildlife, particularly the elk and…
Letters to the Editor
Vote YES for 300 and 301 For the sake of our wildlife and future quality of life, please vote YES for ballotquestions 300 and 301. Every survey of visitors or town residents shows that a major reason for coming here or living here is the wildlife, particularly the elk and deer. Yet, there is in fact no one on the town staff responsible for saying whether new development will adversely affect elk and deer or not.
estesvalleyvoice.com
October 27, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Letters to the Editor
Vote YES for 300 and 301 For the sake of our wildlife and future quality of life, please vote YES for ballotquestions 300 and 301. Every survey of visitors or town residents shows that a major reason for coming here or living here is the wildlife, particularly the elk and…
Vote YES for 300 and 301 For the sake of our wildlife and future quality of life, please vote YES for ballotquestions 300 and 301. Every survey of visitors or town residents shows that a major reason for coming here or living here is the wildlife, particularly the elk and…
When the public is asked to vote directly on statewide policies it is vitally important that our voters know which people and organizations are funding these policy proposals.
#BallotQuestions
#BallotQuestions
June 26, 2025 at 3:29 PM
When the public is asked to vote directly on statewide policies it is vitally important that our voters know which people and organizations are funding these policy proposals.
#BallotQuestions
#BallotQuestions
"Ballot issues deserve a citizen’s patient consideration, not a one-size-fits-all lesson in how to vote no."
Commentary from Dana Hess on a new website that urges South Dakotans to vote no on four #BallotQuestions:
southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/09/09/jus…
Commentary from Dana Hess on a new website that urges South Dakotans to vote no on four #BallotQuestions:
southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/09/09/jus…
Just say no to indiscriminate 'vote no' approach on ballot questions • South Dakota Searchlight
Ballot questions deserve a citizen’s patient consideration, not a one-size-fits-all lesson in how to vote no.
southdakotasearchlight.com
December 17, 2024 at 8:11 PM
"Ballot issues deserve a citizen’s patient consideration, not a one-size-fits-all lesson in how to vote no."
Commentary from Dana Hess on a new website that urges South Dakotans to vote no on four #BallotQuestions:
southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/09/09/jus…
Commentary from Dana Hess on a new website that urges South Dakotans to vote no on four #BallotQuestions:
southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/09/09/jus…
A new law review article argues that South Dakota Republican legislators have spent the past eight years systematically weakening the public’s ability to enact laws through #BallotQuestions, a right enshrined in the state constitution since 1898. buff.ly/gu5BopC
South Dakota’s legacy of citizen ballot questions is under threat, law review authors warn • South Dakota Searchlight
A new law review article argues that South Dakota’s Republican legislative supermajority has systematically weakened the public’s ability to enact laws through ballot questions.
southdakotasearchlight.com
July 10, 2025 at 2:51 PM
A new law review article argues that South Dakota Republican legislators have spent the past eight years systematically weakening the public’s ability to enact laws through #BallotQuestions, a right enshrined in the state constitution since 1898. buff.ly/gu5BopC