to "move on". You say "accusatory tone"? I know when someone is of the "move on" mindset when I see it. They will say things like "well, every country has had horrible history".
The last thing a White person should do is jump on a Black person's posts with "whataboutisms" when it comes to (cont)
The last thing a White person should do is jump on a Black person's posts with "whataboutisms" when it comes to (cont)
December 9, 2025 at 11:48 AM
to "move on". You say "accusatory tone"? I know when someone is of the "move on" mindset when I see it. They will say things like "well, every country has had horrible history".
The last thing a White person should do is jump on a Black person's posts with "whataboutisms" when it comes to (cont)
The last thing a White person should do is jump on a Black person's posts with "whataboutisms" when it comes to (cont)
On MAGAs, Whataboutisms, and Bill Clinton
December 5, 2025 at 12:28 AM
On MAGAs, Whataboutisms, and Bill Clinton
All good, Jane. I know you follow me and read my content, and I appreciate you for your support; but again, for future adivice, just read the room when someone jumps on a Black person's thread with "whataboutisms". It is clearly dismissive and to those who have ancestors who went through it.
December 9, 2025 at 1:56 PM
All good, Jane. I know you follow me and read my content, and I appreciate you for your support; but again, for future adivice, just read the room when someone jumps on a Black person's thread with "whataboutisms". It is clearly dismissive and to those who have ancestors who went through it.
So, SC cannot just eliminate a const clause without 3/4 states affirming. BUT... their job *is* to "interpret" the Const. I could see where they try to shave off some Trump exceptions like anchor babies. He hates those and wants those gone. However,that wld open Pandora's Box of valid whataboutisms.
December 6, 2025 at 12:59 AM
So, SC cannot just eliminate a const clause without 3/4 states affirming. BUT... their job *is* to "interpret" the Const. I could see where they try to shave off some Trump exceptions like anchor babies. He hates those and wants those gone. However,that wld open Pandora's Box of valid whataboutisms.
Man you have to say what other games if you’re going to say whataboutisms.
It’s also stupid to act as if Horses is the only time people haven’t gotten upset about censorship. The payment processor stuff with itch and Steam happened this year!
It’s also stupid to act as if Horses is the only time people haven’t gotten upset about censorship. The payment processor stuff with itch and Steam happened this year!
December 4, 2025 at 9:12 AM
Man you have to say what other games if you’re going to say whataboutisms.
It’s also stupid to act as if Horses is the only time people haven’t gotten upset about censorship. The payment processor stuff with itch and Steam happened this year!
It’s also stupid to act as if Horses is the only time people haven’t gotten upset about censorship. The payment processor stuff with itch and Steam happened this year!
I thought you disliked whataboutisms. 🤔
December 4, 2025 at 8:51 AM
I thought you disliked whataboutisms. 🤔
give it a rest troll. Unlike republicans, democrat voters are not above criticizing their own for bad governance. you just want to deflect with whataboutisms while those you elect do generational damage and blame obama for eternity
December 3, 2025 at 2:53 AM
give it a rest troll. Unlike republicans, democrat voters are not above criticizing their own for bad governance. you just want to deflect with whataboutisms while those you elect do generational damage and blame obama for eternity
Maybe if the right didn't post the vast majority of lies, disinformation, deflections, whataboutisms, and demonstrations of willful sheer ignorance of facts and reality ...
December 2, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Maybe if the right didn't post the vast majority of lies, disinformation, deflections, whataboutisms, and demonstrations of willful sheer ignorance of facts and reality ...
*Adding for clarity: Discussions about where to place additional care are GREAT; contrarian whataboutisms from people who seem to think policing progressives counts as action, not so much.
December 1, 2025 at 5:27 PM
*Adding for clarity: Discussions about where to place additional care are GREAT; contrarian whataboutisms from people who seem to think policing progressives counts as action, not so much.
It’s had ups and downs. The current main cast is a guy on the left from the Clinton campaign/Demparty guy that said Joe Biden was in perfect mental health and the lady on the right just whataboutisms every conversation. The host is decent and when they have guest commentators it’s much better.
December 3, 2025 at 4:50 AM
It’s had ups and downs. The current main cast is a guy on the left from the Clinton campaign/Demparty guy that said Joe Biden was in perfect mental health and the lady on the right just whataboutisms every conversation. The host is decent and when they have guest commentators it’s much better.
I want to make one thing clear tho. Getting to a place where you CAN pay for any lifestyle that woman wants is ABSOLUTELY a flex. Save the Whataboutisms. And save your incel anger cause you CAN'T 🌚
November 30, 2025 at 7:49 PM
I want to make one thing clear tho. Getting to a place where you CAN pay for any lifestyle that woman wants is ABSOLUTELY a flex. Save the Whataboutisms. And save your incel anger cause you CAN'T 🌚
Good. I wish more reporters interrupt politicians who refused to answer ?s & try & throw out red herrings, canned irrelevant talking points or whataboutisms
So many access reporters just shamelessly enable pols to abuse their audience & themselves
vs demand they answer the question
#vanpoli
So many access reporters just shamelessly enable pols to abuse their audience & themselves
vs demand they answer the question
#vanpoli
December 3, 2025 at 8:27 AM
Good. I wish more reporters interrupt politicians who refused to answer ?s & try & throw out red herrings, canned irrelevant talking points or whataboutisms
So many access reporters just shamelessly enable pols to abuse their audience & themselves
vs demand they answer the question
#vanpoli
So many access reporters just shamelessly enable pols to abuse their audience & themselves
vs demand they answer the question
#vanpoli
sorry i'll stop talking about this but i'm just annoyed with ppl not seeing the disparity in ewgor vs other playables and their whataboutisms, all for a regular ass white military dude doing military things but anime. also misandry is not real 👍
November 30, 2025 at 9:40 AM
sorry i'll stop talking about this but i'm just annoyed with ppl not seeing the disparity in ewgor vs other playables and their whataboutisms, all for a regular ass white military dude doing military things but anime. also misandry is not real 👍
Nobody is saying we shouldn't. The whataboutisms are getting old, though, when it's 89% men doing the abusing. For a millenia women have been blamed for the fact that MEN can't control themselves and it's time to fucking stop. Why aren't boys taught to CONTROL THEMSELVES? Genuine question.
November 29, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Nobody is saying we shouldn't. The whataboutisms are getting old, though, when it's 89% men doing the abusing. For a millenia women have been blamed for the fact that MEN can't control themselves and it's time to fucking stop. Why aren't boys taught to CONTROL THEMSELVES? Genuine question.
They willfully enabled the orange mad king for political expediency. Their cowardice brought them and this nation here. From “grab ‘em by the pussy” to Jan 6, they looked the other way. They excused and rationalized. And don’t get me started on whataboutisms. Boo f’n hoo.
🤬🤯
🤬🤯
November 24, 2025 at 6:47 PM
They willfully enabled the orange mad king for political expediency. Their cowardice brought them and this nation here. From “grab ‘em by the pussy” to Jan 6, they looked the other way. They excused and rationalized. And don’t get me started on whataboutisms. Boo f’n hoo.
🤬🤯
🤬🤯
You're right. But this isn't about whataboutisms. This is a question about what is in those files that cannot be revealed? What is egregious enough that people will not accept and turn against him?
November 23, 2025 at 1:59 AM
You're right. But this isn't about whataboutisms. This is a question about what is in those files that cannot be revealed? What is egregious enough that people will not accept and turn against him?
Here she is, Fuhrer Trump, Nice & Ripe..just turned 11 and - lightest of the bunch - we'll get Pam Bondi to dye her hair blonde. The GOP will do Nothing, and we'll distract the MSM with Hunter's Laptop. Remember, it's All Equal, Whataboutisms, and Both sides-sides
November 21, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Here she is, Fuhrer Trump, Nice & Ripe..just turned 11 and - lightest of the bunch - we'll get Pam Bondi to dye her hair blonde. The GOP will do Nothing, and we'll distract the MSM with Hunter's Laptop. Remember, it's All Equal, Whataboutisms, and Both sides-sides
Thank you, Joseph! It's incredible people still compare anything this administration does to prior ones. The whataboutisms are a coping mechanism at best.
November 20, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Thank you, Joseph! It's incredible people still compare anything this administration does to prior ones. The whataboutisms are a coping mechanism at best.
In the Epstein emails, Trump is mentioned 1,670 times.
The copium and whataboutisms are tiring.
The copium and whataboutisms are tiring.
November 15, 2025 at 2:54 PM
In the Epstein emails, Trump is mentioned 1,670 times.
The copium and whataboutisms are tiring.
The copium and whataboutisms are tiring.
I had an interesting interaction with some EU and American liberals yesterday, who were starting to agree with the fact that Ukraine and the Ukrainian army has a big nazi problem (the evidence is too obvious now). But in typical western liberal fashion, their admission came with some whataboutisms.
November 16, 2025 at 3:52 AM
I had an interesting interaction with some EU and American liberals yesterday, who were starting to agree with the fact that Ukraine and the Ukrainian army has a big nazi problem (the evidence is too obvious now). But in typical western liberal fashion, their admission came with some whataboutisms.
They won’t, for example, ban me for saying that I will send the next person who “whataboutisms” in one of my threads to the next dimension where they will languish for all eternity in the home for infinite losers. The death threat is so vague as to escape notice.
November 15, 2025 at 6:25 PM
They won’t, for example, ban me for saying that I will send the next person who “whataboutisms” in one of my threads to the next dimension where they will languish for all eternity in the home for infinite losers. The death threat is so vague as to escape notice.
If you check the other site they’re having full on meltdown of whataboutisms and throwing around accusations of Biden
They will truly stretch to any level for him
They will truly stretch to any level for him
unsure if it’s true, but i’m choosing to believe in that epstein email where he implied that trump gave bill clinton head
November 14, 2025 at 10:40 PM
If you check the other site they’re having full on meltdown of whataboutisms and throwing around accusations of Biden
They will truly stretch to any level for him
They will truly stretch to any level for him
"well what about [Rep/Dem] senator??"
Lock 'em up.
"Pastor who's done a lot of good?"
Lock 'em up.
"Good ol' patriotic scout leader ex-vet?"
Lock 'em up.
We really should be as ruthless in judgement towards them as they were back then. Whataboutisms shouldn't be a thing with this.
Lock 'em up.
"Pastor who's done a lot of good?"
Lock 'em up.
"Good ol' patriotic scout leader ex-vet?"
Lock 'em up.
We really should be as ruthless in judgement towards them as they were back then. Whataboutisms shouldn't be a thing with this.
November 13, 2025 at 5:24 PM
"well what about [Rep/Dem] senator??"
Lock 'em up.
"Pastor who's done a lot of good?"
Lock 'em up.
"Good ol' patriotic scout leader ex-vet?"
Lock 'em up.
We really should be as ruthless in judgement towards them as they were back then. Whataboutisms shouldn't be a thing with this.
Lock 'em up.
"Pastor who's done a lot of good?"
Lock 'em up.
"Good ol' patriotic scout leader ex-vet?"
Lock 'em up.
We really should be as ruthless in judgement towards them as they were back then. Whataboutisms shouldn't be a thing with this.
I would wager that Republican voters won’t care. Because if you vote Republican, you’re either evil or stupid (or both). If you’re evil, you won’t care. If you’re stupid, you’ll believe the excuses, the whataboutisms, and so on. And so it won’t matter.
It’s probably time to stop believing in the Epstein fairy. No amount of evidence is going to change anything.
November 12, 2025 at 4:44 PM
I would wager that Republican voters won’t care. Because if you vote Republican, you’re either evil or stupid (or both). If you’re evil, you won’t care. If you’re stupid, you’ll believe the excuses, the whataboutisms, and so on. And so it won’t matter.