[some-subscribed-rss] New Post: SCOTUS Gets One Right ……… For Now, by Matthew Saroff https://40yrs.blogspot.com/2025/11/scotus-gets-one-right-for-now.html
November 11, 2025 at 8:04 AM
[some-subscribed-rss] New Post: SCOTUS Gets One Right ……… For Now, by Matthew Saroff https://40yrs.blogspot.com/2025/11/scotus-gets-one-right-for-now.html
Mamdani’s victory and SCOTUS declining to hear a challenge to same-sex marriage is some of the best political news I’ve heard in a year. I hope it’s not fleeting, but it’s nice to see a light in the middle of what feels like never ending darkness.
November 11, 2025 at 8:04 AM
Mamdani’s victory and SCOTUS declining to hear a challenge to same-sex marriage is some of the best political news I’ve heard in a year. I hope it’s not fleeting, but it’s nice to see a light in the middle of what feels like never ending darkness.
Not surprising 😒 #SCOTUS are the war criminals now (at least his 6)... Bush v Gore was the start... (not about me, but the world woke up to Trumpism), corrupt to his core...
Yep. As far as I know trump still has 2 Red Warrants at the International Criminal Court for assassinating the Iranian general & beloved pol🤢, while we were defacto ceasefire on mutual mission to find/destroy ISIS by request of a mutual friend?
Did I mention trump is a diagnosed psychopath UK def?
Did I mention trump is a diagnosed psychopath UK def?
November 11, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Not surprising 😒 #SCOTUS are the war criminals now (at least his 6)... Bush v Gore was the start... (not about me, but the world woke up to Trumpism), corrupt to his core...
Well, I hope SCOTUS stops letting him steal more money.
The whole (stupid, stupid, stupid) argument about how the Trump Admin can't stop the tariffs, because they don't have the infrastructure or want to give the money back...
The whole (stupid, stupid, stupid) argument about how the Trump Admin can't stop the tariffs, because they don't have the infrastructure or want to give the money back...
November 11, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Well, I hope SCOTUS stops letting him steal more money.
The whole (stupid, stupid, stupid) argument about how the Trump Admin can't stop the tariffs, because they don't have the infrastructure or want to give the money back...
The whole (stupid, stupid, stupid) argument about how the Trump Admin can't stop the tariffs, because they don't have the infrastructure or want to give the money back...
Now (post Trump):
1) His own people (Congress, SCOTUS, remaining fed employees) are AFRAID of him.
2) Democrats thinks he’s a pathetic excuse for a human being.
3) Millions have already died around the world from his lack of diplomacy.
1) His own people (Congress, SCOTUS, remaining fed employees) are AFRAID of him.
2) Democrats thinks he’s a pathetic excuse for a human being.
3) Millions have already died around the world from his lack of diplomacy.
November 11, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Now (post Trump):
1) His own people (Congress, SCOTUS, remaining fed employees) are AFRAID of him.
2) Democrats thinks he’s a pathetic excuse for a human being.
3) Millions have already died around the world from his lack of diplomacy.
1) His own people (Congress, SCOTUS, remaining fed employees) are AFRAID of him.
2) Democrats thinks he’s a pathetic excuse for a human being.
3) Millions have already died around the world from his lack of diplomacy.
The Orange buffoon is a stochastic terrorist thanks to the six troglodytic GQP MAGAT judges on SCOTUS.
November 11, 2025 at 7:57 AM
The Orange buffoon is a stochastic terrorist thanks to the six troglodytic GQP MAGAT judges on SCOTUS.
I knew it was gonna be bad. It's so depressing to me, to see people suffer, & get her from him/ them, and watching it, in front of our eyes.
It breaks me up, HARD!!
I want them in prison for treason, and war crimes on us! All of them; including SCOTUS.
It breaks me up, HARD!!
I want them in prison for treason, and war crimes on us! All of them; including SCOTUS.
November 11, 2025 at 7:54 AM
I knew it was gonna be bad. It's so depressing to me, to see people suffer, & get her from him/ them, and watching it, in front of our eyes.
It breaks me up, HARD!!
I want them in prison for treason, and war crimes on us! All of them; including SCOTUS.
It breaks me up, HARD!!
I want them in prison for treason, and war crimes on us! All of them; including SCOTUS.
“It’s totally too much work & too expensive to fix the illegal criming I did, so SCOTUS should just let me get away w/ it” - best criminal defense tactic eva
November 11, 2025 at 7:54 AM
“It’s totally too much work & too expensive to fix the illegal criming I did, so SCOTUS should just let me get away w/ it” - best criminal defense tactic eva
Keep it up Donnie and SCOTUS may be pissed off enough to do the right thing.
November 11, 2025 at 7:47 AM
Keep it up Donnie and SCOTUS may be pissed off enough to do the right thing.
How many courts have upheld the ruling on this case? Surely SCOTUS will look away. It’s not like they don’t have important things to do.
November 11, 2025 at 7:47 AM
How many courts have upheld the ruling on this case? Surely SCOTUS will look away. It’s not like they don’t have important things to do.
Folks, the glaring red flag there is “National Security Event”. He’s looking for any excuse to invoke emergency powers and terminate democracy. Permanently! i.e. “We had to tariff because ‘emergency’ and if SCOTUS ends tariffs = ‘emergency’!!! 😤
November 11, 2025 at 7:47 AM
Folks, the glaring red flag there is “National Security Event”. He’s looking for any excuse to invoke emergency powers and terminate democracy. Permanently! i.e. “We had to tariff because ‘emergency’ and if SCOTUS ends tariffs = ‘emergency’!!! 😤
Also the complications would be so dumb and annoying to handle after hundreds of cases get pushed to the Supreme Court
It doesn’t make any legal sense other than spite
And spite is not a reason to overturn a SCOTUS ruling lmao
It doesn’t make any legal sense other than spite
And spite is not a reason to overturn a SCOTUS ruling lmao
November 11, 2025 at 7:46 AM
Also the complications would be so dumb and annoying to handle after hundreds of cases get pushed to the Supreme Court
It doesn’t make any legal sense other than spite
And spite is not a reason to overturn a SCOTUS ruling lmao
It doesn’t make any legal sense other than spite
And spite is not a reason to overturn a SCOTUS ruling lmao
Kim Davis, SCOTUS just made your voice irrelevant.
You can voice your opinions all the day long, but you can't enforce them.
Be best.👠
You can voice your opinions all the day long, but you can't enforce them.
Be best.👠
November 11, 2025 at 7:46 AM
Kim Davis, SCOTUS just made your voice irrelevant.
You can voice your opinions all the day long, but you can't enforce them.
Be best.👠
You can voice your opinions all the day long, but you can't enforce them.
Be best.👠
When you kick them out and replace them with young progressives.
Universal healthcare
Scotus term limits
Congress, senate age limits
No PAC money
Overturn citizens United
That's a start.
Universal healthcare
Scotus term limits
Congress, senate age limits
No PAC money
Overturn citizens United
That's a start.
November 11, 2025 at 7:44 AM
When you kick them out and replace them with young progressives.
Universal healthcare
Scotus term limits
Congress, senate age limits
No PAC money
Overturn citizens United
That's a start.
Universal healthcare
Scotus term limits
Congress, senate age limits
No PAC money
Overturn citizens United
That's a start.
like sorry dude this is shades of "don't threaten us with the SCOTUS to vote for Clinton" all over again
by all means, primary whomever, but vote for whoever wins in the general
being too cute by far and rejecting "less bad" because you didn't get "ideal" is why we're in this problem
by all means, primary whomever, but vote for whoever wins in the general
being too cute by far and rejecting "less bad" because you didn't get "ideal" is why we're in this problem
November 11, 2025 at 7:44 AM
like sorry dude this is shades of "don't threaten us with the SCOTUS to vote for Clinton" all over again
by all means, primary whomever, but vote for whoever wins in the general
being too cute by far and rejecting "less bad" because you didn't get "ideal" is why we're in this problem
by all means, primary whomever, but vote for whoever wins in the general
being too cute by far and rejecting "less bad" because you didn't get "ideal" is why we're in this problem
It never had a hope in hell of being taken up by SCOTUS, as much as Thomas and Alito may have wanted to rule on it.
November 11, 2025 at 7:41 AM
It never had a hope in hell of being taken up by SCOTUS, as much as Thomas and Alito may have wanted to rule on it.
“National security event” is the magical ‘thou shalt not question the king’ phrase scotus provided to him with their immunity ruling. I’m surprised he hasn’t used it to justify his lust for starving the needy while partying with the greedy.
November 11, 2025 at 7:40 AM
“National security event” is the magical ‘thou shalt not question the king’ phrase scotus provided to him with their immunity ruling. I’m surprised he hasn’t used it to justify his lust for starving the needy while partying with the greedy.
forgot about
reps: packing the scotus court
dems: next time we will pack the courts too... BUT actually do not do it
reps:gerymandering
dems: NO un-gerymandering
reps: contest elections
dems:do not contest russian ingerence
so sick...
dems betrayed us
good cop, bad cop... you see ?
reps: packing the scotus court
dems: next time we will pack the courts too... BUT actually do not do it
reps:gerymandering
dems: NO un-gerymandering
reps: contest elections
dems:do not contest russian ingerence
so sick...
dems betrayed us
good cop, bad cop... you see ?
November 11, 2025 at 7:38 AM
forgot about
reps: packing the scotus court
dems: next time we will pack the courts too... BUT actually do not do it
reps:gerymandering
dems: NO un-gerymandering
reps: contest elections
dems:do not contest russian ingerence
so sick...
dems betrayed us
good cop, bad cop... you see ?
reps: packing the scotus court
dems: next time we will pack the courts too... BUT actually do not do it
reps:gerymandering
dems: NO un-gerymandering
reps: contest elections
dems:do not contest russian ingerence
so sick...
dems betrayed us
good cop, bad cop... you see ?
She won’t… the mango twät will get involved and get scotus to reverse… who’s gunna take that bet 🤷♂️🤣🤣🤣
Not only did the Supreme Court deny Kim Davis — shorty has to pay $360,000 in damages and legal fees to the couple she refused to issue a marriage license to…👇
Good job! 😎✨
Good job! 😎✨
November 11, 2025 at 7:38 AM
She won’t… the mango twät will get involved and get scotus to reverse… who’s gunna take that bet 🤷♂️🤣🤣🤣
Right before finding out which way SCOTUS comes down on the question of starving millions of children? That's the worst, stupidest time to cave. It's really weird that Dem Senators are posting pretending like they don't know that.
Sheldon Whitehouse absolutely understood what Jackson, J did. 🧵
Sheldon Whitehouse absolutely understood what Jackson, J did. 🧵
November 11, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Right before finding out which way SCOTUS comes down on the question of starving millions of children? That's the worst, stupidest time to cave. It's really weird that Dem Senators are posting pretending like they don't know that.
Sheldon Whitehouse absolutely understood what Jackson, J did. 🧵
Sheldon Whitehouse absolutely understood what Jackson, J did. 🧵
We lost this round...and the odds of Rs caving was always slim. Dems simply don't have anything Trumps wants. They COULD have covered themselves by saying "His depravity at going to SCOTUS to halt SNAP payments just really knocked us off our feet. How much more could we ask of people"
November 11, 2025 at 7:36 AM
We lost this round...and the odds of Rs caving was always slim. Dems simply don't have anything Trumps wants. They COULD have covered themselves by saying "His depravity at going to SCOTUS to halt SNAP payments just really knocked us off our feet. How much more could we ask of people"
In terms of dark money (from "donors * or via PACS) and corruption American politics has gone off the deep end, ever since the "Citizens United" ruling by a previous extreme right-wing SCOTUS. Which is precisely what corporations and others wanted.
November 11, 2025 at 7:34 AM
In terms of dark money (from "donors * or via PACS) and corruption American politics has gone off the deep end, ever since the "Citizens United" ruling by a previous extreme right-wing SCOTUS. Which is precisely what corporations and others wanted.
That would be the ultimate karma slap to SCOTUS.
November 11, 2025 at 7:34 AM
That would be the ultimate karma slap to SCOTUS.
How did $100 billion become $2 trillion?
SCOTUS is not stupid. They know that the $100 billion in tariff's was paid in the U.S. and NOTHING by other countries. Why does he keep telling debunked lies?
I really hope that his lawyer makes that claim to SCOTUS.
It'll make it easy for them to decide.
SCOTUS is not stupid. They know that the $100 billion in tariff's was paid in the U.S. and NOTHING by other countries. Why does he keep telling debunked lies?
I really hope that his lawyer makes that claim to SCOTUS.
It'll make it easy for them to decide.
Well this is rich. So far we've collected about $100 billion in tariff revenue from US businesses, but Trump is claiming if SCOTUS doesn't side with him we'll go bankrupt from having to pay back $2 trillion to the other countries that supposedly paid these tariffs.
www.rawstory.com/trump-2-bill...
www.rawstory.com/trump-2-bill...
Trump threatens to 'pay back' $2 trillion if Supreme Court rules against tariffs
President Donald Trump warned that there would be a $2 trillion "catastrophe" if the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against his ability to impose emergency tariffs, despite having collected only around $100...
www.rawstory.com
November 11, 2025 at 7:34 AM
How did $100 billion become $2 trillion?
SCOTUS is not stupid. They know that the $100 billion in tariff's was paid in the U.S. and NOTHING by other countries. Why does he keep telling debunked lies?
I really hope that his lawyer makes that claim to SCOTUS.
It'll make it easy for them to decide.
SCOTUS is not stupid. They know that the $100 billion in tariff's was paid in the U.S. and NOTHING by other countries. Why does he keep telling debunked lies?
I really hope that his lawyer makes that claim to SCOTUS.
It'll make it easy for them to decide.