⚡️ SCOTUS will NOT overturn marriage equality 🎉
November 10, 2025 at 2:52 PM
⚡️ SCOTUS will NOT overturn marriage equality 🎉
The president seems to have been briefed on how the tariffs oral argument at SCOTUS went:
November 9, 2025 at 1:48 PM
The president seems to have been briefed on how the tariffs oral argument at SCOTUS went:
Rare SCOTUS W
November 10, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Rare SCOTUS W
scotus absolutely gave trump the bad news, incredible
November 9, 2025 at 5:53 PM
scotus absolutely gave trump the bad news, incredible
Good news, via The WashPost, from SCOTUS:
November 10, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Good news, via The WashPost, from SCOTUS:
important news on SCOTUS + LGBTQ rights this morning;
BREAKING: The Supreme Court DENIES former county clerk Kim Davis's request for the justices to take up her longshot bid to overturn 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges marriage equality decision. No justice even writes about the request.
November 10, 2025 at 3:34 PM
important news on SCOTUS + LGBTQ rights this morning;
My 90-second breakdown repost from IG on the SNAP benefits SCOTUS stay
November 8, 2025 at 1:16 PM
My 90-second breakdown repost from IG on the SNAP benefits SCOTUS stay
Some good news out of SCOTUS for once.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.
Supreme Court rejects call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide
The Supreme Court has rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
bit.ly
November 10, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Some good news out of SCOTUS for once.
#BREAKING: Over no public dissents, #SCOTUS denies Kim Davis's petition asking the justices to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges (which recognized federal constitutional protections for same-sex marriage):
www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
www.supremecourt.gov
November 10, 2025 at 2:31 PM
#BREAKING: Over no public dissents, #SCOTUS denies Kim Davis's petition asking the justices to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges (which recognized federal constitutional protections for same-sex marriage):
www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
Abolishing the Senate and SCOTUS should be talked about much more.
It's not normal to have a "senate" in a democracy. It's explicitly anti-democratic.
November 10, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Abolishing the Senate and SCOTUS should be talked about much more.
Rare SCOTUS win.
They're still corrupt as fuck though
They're still corrupt as fuck though
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide.
Supreme Court rejects call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide
The Supreme Court has rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
bit.ly
November 10, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Rare SCOTUS win.
They're still corrupt as fuck though
They're still corrupt as fuck though
I don't have a high opinion of SCOTUS.
But this outcome was clear-as Mark & I explained on MSNBC: www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-...
People SHOULD worry about SCOTUS & educate people about what SCOTUS is doing & might do.
They shouldn't whip ppl into frenzies on cases that aren't going anywhere.
But this outcome was clear-as Mark & I explained on MSNBC: www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-...
People SHOULD worry about SCOTUS & educate people about what SCOTUS is doing & might do.
They shouldn't whip ppl into frenzies on cases that aren't going anywhere.
November 10, 2025 at 2:40 PM
I don't have a high opinion of SCOTUS.
But this outcome was clear-as Mark & I explained on MSNBC: www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-...
People SHOULD worry about SCOTUS & educate people about what SCOTUS is doing & might do.
They shouldn't whip ppl into frenzies on cases that aren't going anywhere.
But this outcome was clear-as Mark & I explained on MSNBC: www.msnbc.com/ana-cabrera-...
People SHOULD worry about SCOTUS & educate people about what SCOTUS is doing & might do.
They shouldn't whip ppl into frenzies on cases that aren't going anywhere.
SCOTUS telling Kim Davis to fuck off forever. Pump that right into my veins.
November 10, 2025 at 3:39 PM
SCOTUS telling Kim Davis to fuck off forever. Pump that right into my veins.
SCOTUS SNAP Benefits Ruling w/ Steve Vladeck
open.substack.com/pub/katiepha...
open.substack.com/pub/katiepha...
SCOTUS SNAP Benefits Ruling w/ Steve Vladeck
A special Saturday Live to really dive into the details of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's ruling from late last night
open.substack.com
November 9, 2025 at 12:56 AM
SCOTUS SNAP Benefits Ruling w/ Steve Vladeck
open.substack.com/pub/katiepha...
open.substack.com/pub/katiepha...
SCOTUS made the right decision. 👏
Breaking News: The Supreme Court denied a request to consider overturning its landmark decision to legalize same-sex marriage a decade ago. nyti.ms/3Ju2Ayd
November 10, 2025 at 2:54 PM
SCOTUS made the right decision. 👏
Damn Kim Davis is pissed at SCOTUS for not taking up her case. #LoveIsLove
November 10, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Damn Kim Davis is pissed at SCOTUS for not taking up her case. #LoveIsLove
Oh, this is wild.
DOJ went to SCOTUS *before* we got the First Circuit's administrative stay denial. (We know this because DOJ just filed a letter at SCOTUS about the admin stay denial.)
So, DOJ went to SCOTUS b/c the First Circuit did not meet its less-than-seven-hour "deadline" for a ruling.
DOJ went to SCOTUS *before* we got the First Circuit's administrative stay denial. (We know this because DOJ just filed a letter at SCOTUS about the admin stay denial.)
So, DOJ went to SCOTUS b/c the First Circuit did not meet its less-than-seven-hour "deadline" for a ruling.
November 8, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Oh, this is wild.
DOJ went to SCOTUS *before* we got the First Circuit's administrative stay denial. (We know this because DOJ just filed a letter at SCOTUS about the admin stay denial.)
So, DOJ went to SCOTUS b/c the First Circuit did not meet its less-than-seven-hour "deadline" for a ruling.
DOJ went to SCOTUS *before* we got the First Circuit's administrative stay denial. (We know this because DOJ just filed a letter at SCOTUS about the admin stay denial.)
So, DOJ went to SCOTUS b/c the First Circuit did not meet its less-than-seven-hour "deadline" for a ruling.
I’m just saying, but if I had just gotten completely shellacked on Tuesday, I wouldn’t be asking SCOTUS to let me starve millions of people 3 days later.
November 8, 2025 at 2:09 AM
I’m just saying, but if I had just gotten completely shellacked on Tuesday, I wouldn’t be asking SCOTUS to let me starve millions of people 3 days later.
Breaking: SCOTUS declines to hear challenge to same sex marriage.
November 10, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Breaking: SCOTUS declines to hear challenge to same sex marriage.
ICYMI: Here's the Substack Live I did with @stevevladeck.bsky.social this afternoon on the SCOTUS SNAP benefits ruling
substack.com/@katiephang/...
substack.com/@katiephang/...
SCOTUS SNAP Benefits Ruling w/ Steve Vladeck
A special Saturday Live to really dive into the details of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's ruling from late last night
substack.com
November 8, 2025 at 9:46 PM
ICYMI: Here's the Substack Live I did with @stevevladeck.bsky.social this afternoon on the SCOTUS SNAP benefits ruling
substack.com/@katiephang/...
substack.com/@katiephang/...
SCOTUS Denies Request to Revisit Gay Marriage Ruling
November 10, 2025 at 3:26 PM
SCOTUS Denies Request to Revisit Gay Marriage Ruling
The right decision but all too rare for this SCOTUS majority to choose to protect rights rather than erode them!
Breaking News: The Supreme Court denied a request to consider overturning its landmark decision to legalize same-sex marriage a decade ago. nyti.ms/3Ju2Ayd
November 10, 2025 at 3:37 PM
The right decision but all too rare for this SCOTUS majority to choose to protect rights rather than erode them!
SCOTUS, even this SCOTUS, would have a very hard time directly contradicting the congress asserting the power of the purse in a bipartisan fashion.
but like if we hold as "Trump will just break the law any ways" then no deal is worthwhile, no matter what it says?
November 10, 2025 at 12:51 AM
SCOTUS, even this SCOTUS, would have a very hard time directly contradicting the congress asserting the power of the purse in a bipartisan fashion.
Yes, but... this tells us that he's losing at SCOTUS.
November 9, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Yes, but... this tells us that he's losing at SCOTUS.