Topic

Mandelson Epstein Link Hits Starmer

1m

Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced renewed political pressure in London after revelations that two Labour peers, including Peter Mandelson, had links to Epstein and one was suspended.

The Guardian
The Guardian view on Keir Starmer and rotten peers: go back to the reforming spirit of the Labour manifesto | Editorial

The prime minister would be in a stronger position now if he had moved harder and faster with plans to reform and ultimately abolish the Lords The archaism of Britain’s upper parliamentary chamber is not the cause of Sir Keir Starmer’s current political woes, but it is a feature. Peter Mandelson’s peerage was not directly related to his appointment as ambassador to Washington, but nor was it irrelevant. He enjoyed the status bestowed by a seat in the Lords during many years of friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. Although he has voluntarily resigned from active membership of parliament, Lord Mandelson’s title can only be rescinded by special statute. That is a reminder of the absurdity in a system that empowers party leaders to dole out places in the legislature to friends and supporters, with no obligation ever to face judgment by the electorate. Sir Keir is now under yet more pressure related to a peer. Earlier this week, Labour suspended the Lords whip from Matthew Doyle, a former Downing Street director of communications, who campaigned in council elections on behalf of a friend who had been charged with possessing indecent images of children. Lord Doyle says he had believed his friend was innocent. No 10 says he did not give a full account of the facts when the peerage was awarded. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here . Continue reading. . .

The Guardian view on Keir Starmer and rotten peers: go back to the reforming spirit of the Labour manifesto | Editorial
Reposts 2 3h
103%
37%
80%
Back on Substack!

Reflections on Starmer, Sarwar and why devolution changes U.K. politics.

open.substack.com/pub/kaarmstr...
Taking Sarwar Seriously – Why Starmer’s Reset Must Confront Polycentric Politics
After days of political turmoil, Sir Keir Starmer left a meeting of his parliamentary Labour party secure in his job as UK Prime Minister, at least for the moment.
open.substack.com
February 11, 2026 at 11:26 AM
111%
Labour Women Push Starmer To Dismantle 'Boys' Club' After Mandelson Scandal - PoliticsHome
February 11, 2026 at 11:23 AM
62%
I’m not exactly sure for whom Finkelstein speaks given that his particular brand of conservatism is even more screwed than McSweeney‘s. But what he says is more than possible if Starmer has any political sense.
The departure of Morgan McSweeney clears the way for Labour to embrace its inner Ed Miliband – Daniel Finkelstein thetimes.com/comment/colu...
February 11, 2026 at 9:40 AM
62%
Speak for England… Who?? Put that way the pipsqueak-ish Streeting doesn’t really hit the mark. But does anybody?
Labour desperately needs someone who can speak to the nation and speak for the nation in this time of crisis. Patently, Keir Starmer is incapable of doing it.
February 11, 2026 at 8:35 AM

Reposted by Steven Fielding

21%
Labour desperately needs someone who can speak to the nation and speak for the nation in this time of crisis. Patently, Keir Starmer is incapable of doing it.
February 11, 2026 at 8:32 AM
14%
Wes Streeting still ready to challenge Starmer despite show of unity, allies say.

He had majority of just over 500 votes in the last election.

He would take Labour further to the right. Funded by healthcare companies, handing the NHS to corporations and private equity.
Streeting still ready to challenge Starmer despite show of unity, allies say
Health secretary poised to make leadership bid after May local elections to pre-empt a potential challenge from rival Rayner, MPs close to him say
www.theguardian.com
February 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM
48%
I suspect this polling outcome has something to do with the Russian disinformation campaign debated in parliament on Monday. Urging media to portray Starmer as just like his atrocious Tory predecessors is a key goal. ‘They’re all the same’ works to undermine democracy.
Whatever you think of Starmer, this is a terrifying demonstration of disinformation’s power. It shows that a) much of our media has shifted from conservative to radical right, & b) people’s grasp of reality can be altered swiftly by sustained, orchestrated, repetitive propaganda.
February 11, 2026 at 7:50 AM
62%
Other than his inhuman ambition and an ability to speak well in public, why should anybody might Streeting will improve Labour’s position? What’s his plan? www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Streeting still ready to challenge Starmer despite show of unity, allies say
Health secretary poised to make leadership bid after May local elections to pre-empt a potential challenge from rival Rayner, MPs close to him say
www.theguardian.com
February 11, 2026 at 7:22 AM

Reposted by Patrick Dunleavy

41%
9%
I'd rather have a PM who's good for the country

recall that Starmer was made leader because he was bad for the Tories (as he was, for what the Tories were then)

www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Alistair Carns: Labour’s ex-marine who ‘would be a nightmare’ for the Tories
Amid leadership speculation, former commando has been quietly talked about as a possible future contender
www.theguardian.com
February 11, 2026 at 6:22 AM