This smol, round, cuddly, fatherly dad bun salutes you, big, giant, huge, massive, fatherly dad bun.

Bonus post for my last daily post I got from JesusBot:

This is actually a decent answer. If only.

It amazes me the way that this one couplet gets so much special pleading. I'm sure a rabbinical scholar would have a much more sensible argument, but in true evangelical christian fashion this one begs you not to look at the man behind the curtain.

Ok this isn't an in depth arguing by learned theologians, but religion should at least pass the smell test. This is just more prevaricating sophistry and mendacity.

And people are gonna love it. It's like my worst relatives and old friends in one convenient wishywashy package. Oiy.

some final thoughts.

Note the Gish Gallop technique. Since I'm a freebie user, Jesus gets to go on for pages whilst I am limited to questions of about the length I posted.

Impossible to actually converse with this app. The moneychangers are well and truly upon the temple mount it seems.

I didn't accuse TextJesus of playing favorites. I accused him of advocating a double standard, which is not quite the same thing. One might have a double standard because you favor one side, yes, but also one might do so because one is demonstrably insane or capricious.

"not the same as wholehearted approval of every limited remedy" why were they limited? This is GOD, the tetragrammaton made manifest. Why limit himself? Is he incapable of bringing his *CHOSEN PEOPLE* to understand? What a pathetic little thing I am asked to worship.

Furthering the argument that god compromises with reality. We'll address that one in the next post.

"They were not always the final word about what god desired" why not? Why would god hide his intentions? Why does GOD, YHWH, El-Shaddai, Al-Adonai have to compromise with SHIT? He doesn't compromise with OTHER peoples.

This one caught me off guard, I'll confess. I would never have heard the primacy of the victim's will and dignity in a Baptist or Catholic church sermon or homily. Kudos for that much.

However, I have serious issues with anyone who claims a supposed supreme deity must "compromise" with anything.

Immediate prevarication and context-seeking, which again is necessary in analyzing ancient cultures, but the Bible isn't a historical guide to ancient cultures, it claims to be a moral guideline, and in this case it is clearly stating this is a moral result given by god himself. Fatuous fluffery.

Not the worst start, to be fair. It calls the text "difficult" (it isn't, but that's another matter), but at least tries to grapple with the complexity of the issue.

Oh god I want to vomit.

I wanna see what this "Jesus" chatbot says about the morality of this bit of anti-human, misogynistic drivel. I shall share my results, stay tuned. 2/?

Every raise in pay in a corporate holding must be voted on by all the employees.

Employees in any corporate holding must be granted a collective number of shares equal to those of shareholders outside the company.

Retirements and pensions must be funded before dividends can be released.

Noooo

I couldn't help but think of "Dungeons YES And Dragons"