William Ellis
banner
willellisecon.bsky.social
William Ellis
@willellisecon.bsky.social
Senior Economist at IPPR, focussing on the macro economy. Ex-HMT and Oxford Economics. Special interest in macro and AI/Automation. All views are my own.
Nugget 2 — Productivity: After an upgrade in the last report, the Bank changed its mind and downgraded the path: growth in output per worker is ~0.2pp below the OBR on average and ~0.1pp below its Aug forecast. We'll be keeping an eye on how that compares to the OBR at budget.
November 6, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Nugget 1 — APF/QT: There’s been debate around the pace of Quantitative Tightening (QT), and how much this is costing the taxpayer. At @ippr.org we’ve long called for more transparency and it looks like that’s coming – with more detail and a ‘new measure’ next week in the APF report.
November 6, 2025 at 5:54 PM
I go into these points in more detail in my piece — do give it a read!
Navigating in the fog: Why the OBR should hold its nerve on the productivity forecast | IPPR
Productivity growth is central to the UK economy. Higher productivity allows the UK to produce more output without increasing its inputs (eg an employee pr
www.ippr.org
September 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
3️⃣ The FT rightly note that government policy could raise productivity, but impacts may take time to materialise. Even a modest +0.1ppt medium-term boost would be material - so the OBR should wait until policy details are clearer before baking them in.
September 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
2️⃣ The BoE recently upgraded its near-to-medium term productivity forecast. Recent LFS data has actually been in line with the OBR’s view. A downgrade larger than 0.1ppt would make the OBR more pessimistic than the BoE — an unlikely stance.
September 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
1️⃣ Even the “official” LFS data is highly uncertain. Between 2002 Q2–2016 Q3, productivity growth was typically revised by around ±0.6ppts three years after the first estimate: ons.gov.uk/employmentan...
Labour productivity: revisions triangles - Office for National Statistics
Revisions triangles for the main labour productivity variables.
ons.gov.uk
September 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
The FT illustrate uncertainty using recent upswings in admin data (see my recreation below) — adding even more fog for the OBR to navigate. But this isn’t the only source of uncertainty. There are several reasons why the OBR should remain cautious…
September 11, 2025 at 12:32 PM
4/ Uncertainty is also high. Big revisions are typical, and the data remains is in development. +/-0.6ppts revisions have been common – further expected with upcoming changes to the LFS. The OBR is navigating in the fog – it should wait for a signal before changing direction.
August 14, 2025 at 10:41 AM
3/The OBR is often optimistic on productivity - but public investment is high, and we have a raft of productivity-enhancing policy down the tracks. If they downgrade, the OBR may have to upgrade again once policies are final and fully assessed.
August 14, 2025 at 10:41 AM
2/Recent weak data was expected - we are still at the tail end of high inflation disruption. All forecasters expect a turnaround. The BoE in fact revised up its (respected) forecast, now similar to the OBR. Recent outturn data is thus not a reason for the OBR to change.
August 14, 2025 at 10:41 AM