Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

nem e

@whorlbinder.bsky.social

10 followers 43 following 2 posts

https://neonorangepylonofterror.bandcamp.com/

swamp and wetland enthusiast
she|they|it

Posts Replies Media Videos

Reposted by nem e

Bill Beagle

@billbeagle.bsky.social

🐶 🎤

January 27, 2026 at 10:01 AM

Reposted by nem e

𝔰𝔞𝔩𝔢𝔪 ☾🔞🏳️‍⚧️

@w0lfertinger666.bsky.social

sk8ter kitty girl
(she/her for Hitomi) 🐈🏳️‍⚧️🛹⛓️

art that depicts four different drawings of a grey anthropomorphic cat that is a gender non conforming trans woman named Hitomi.

she is grey and white with a darker gradient on her arms along with white stripes on her arms and white fingers. her paw pad color on her hand paw is pink.

in the first pose on the left, she is raising/waving her left arm while carrying a skateboard in her right arm/hand. she wears a black tank top that slightly reveals her tummy and boxers. her pants are green and baggy, with pockets and pouches on them along with chains and a mouse keycharm. she has three different belts that all loop around each other, the first belt having a giant skull design on it. and she also wears black shoes that are almost covered by her pants

in the second pose on the bottom right, she wears a tight fitting maroon top that reveals her belly and happy trail all while her pants are unbuckled and slightly sagging, revealing her boxers/bulge.

the drawing in the middle right is a chibi version of her that's drawn in a cat loafing position with colorful blue text that reads "LOAF !"

the final drawing on the top right is another chibi version of her, a little more detailed. she wears the same outfit from the first pose on the left and is riding her skateboard (that has a blue snow leopard design on the skate deck)

January 27, 2026 at 10:28 PM

Reposted by nem e

Seth Cotlar

@sethcotlar.bsky.social

This makes me think of that 1990 interview Trump did with Playboy where he admitted that when it came to Tiananmen Square, he was rooting for the tanks.

"When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it," Trump said. "Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak."

January 25, 2026 at 7:56 PM

Reposted by nem e

Stella

@antlervel.vet

Gotcha—let’s dig into that step by step.

1. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵, because I turned you into an amorphous lump of flesh. You’re not just immobile—you’re immortal, and you feel only anguish.

2. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺. That makes total sense—it’s a natural human impulse, and you’ve been through a lot.

January 23, 2026 at 3:46 PM

Reposted by nem e

ArkSeaside

@arkseaside.bsky.social

wooooah black betty

January 22, 2026 at 9:09 PM

Reposted by nem e

holly “shockening” pine

@shockpine.bsky.social

i've been practicing the 50s look a bit.

January 22, 2026 at 11:38 PM

Reposted by nem e

Azel

@azeldraws.bsky.social

Washington- they’re trying the internet age restriction stuff here. Do you want to give up *your* privacy because someone else can’t properly parent *their* children? Comment, call, don’t let it pass!

Amras, A Werewolf Story θ∆ @amras.me · 10d

Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.

I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution.

Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children.

Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque!

Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.

Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to them—on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.—to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists.

I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill.

Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.

January 23, 2026 at 1:49 AM

nem e

@whorlbinder.bsky.social

wondering if i should learn any formal musical theory. i know chords, rhythms, styles and shit and i compose largely based on vibes and i like how things sound, but...

October 26, 2025 at 9:20 AM