I respectfully suggest that the qualifying clause "and will to the best of my ability" be removed from the oath. The current oath apparently allows someone who is not able to preserve, protect and defend the constitution, to go ahead and be president anyway.

Fourteen Samurai

Connecticut represent!

@fallofcivspod.bsky.social
I think the reason I am addicted to this podcast is that it helps me to know that I'm not alone. This is not the end of history.

Same. Except that I usually just block them. I wish there was an unfollow function.

LOL....and Ew

I'm in CT. I used to like him. He was a good attorney general. But he's turned into another Joe Lieberman. He needs to be primaried.

So then why does blocking or following work? If someone can follow me, then I should have the ability to remove the follow, or at the very least deny the request. Some of the follows I get are obviously bots and are easy blocks, but others are not so easy to determine. It's a safety issue.

I really don't understand what that means. Saying something like that without linking to the source isn't particularly helpful when searching doesn't really work here

I'm just a little guy who should not have as many followers as I have. I get followed by random accounts for no reason than engagement farming. Please give me the ability to remove a follower without blocking.

At the risk of being repetitive...I didn't think the leopard would eat MY face ...

And one for accounts that post photos with no attribution.