Wesley Tharpe
banner
wesleytharpe.bsky.social
Wesley Tharpe
@wesleytharpe.bsky.social
Senior Advisor for State Tax Policy @centeronbudget.bsky.social. Formerly @gabudget.bsky.social. I've been called the emerging tax cut conscience of a nation. Mostly music, memes, West Wing, and the open road beyond that.
And for more details on how both Senate & House Republican plans would further shift costs & force hard choices in states generally, we’ve got you here: www.cbpp.org/blog/trackin...
States Would Face New Costs, Likely Enact Harmful Cuts Under Senate Reconciliation Plan | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
Like its House counterpart, the Senate Republican leaders’ reconciliation plan would shift...
www.cbpp.org
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
These are just a few examples, but they’re not unique: under the Republican reconciliation plan, *all* states will face serious new costs & painful tradeoffs. More state-specific SNAP cost-shift examples are available here: www.cbpp.org/research/foo...
Research Note: Senate Republican Leaders’ Proposal Risks Deep Cuts to Food Assistance, Some States Ending SNAP Entirely | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
States, which must balance their budgets every year, would struggle to absorb these substantial new costs.
www.cbpp.org
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
And #NewYork’s annual #SNAP benefits’ bill could swell to nearly $1.1 billion, or about 3X annual state spending on the Department of Environmental Conservation, which protects the state's natural resources and prevents and abates water and air pollution.
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
#NewJersey could be on the hook for an estimated $287M, or nearly their annual state spending on county colleges, which serve more than 168,000 students.
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
#Colorado, meanwhile, could owe about $194M, equal to two-thirds their Department of Public Safety’s annual budget, which funds the state highway patrol, Bureau of Investigation, and fire prevention and code enforcement.
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
In #California, annual #SNAP benefit costs could surpass $1.8 billion, roughly equal to state spending on the Department of Public Health, whose responsibilities include health emergency response, food safety, & infectious disease control.
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
#Arizona would owe about $300M, or close to their yearly state spending on their Department of Forestry and Fire Management and the Department of Public Safety combined.
July 1, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Reposted by Wesley Tharpe
It shocks the conscience that Senate Republican leaders saw the impacts of the House bill — 16 million more people uninsured and millions losing help buying groceries, including families with children — and chose to double down.
June 17, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Tldr: the enormous cuts passed by House Republicans, which not-for-nothing coincide with massive new tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, would force states to pick up billions in new costs & make a series of excruciating tradeoffs. It’s a bad deal the Senate should reject.
June 3, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Public education would be at especially high risk, given that it makes up the largest share of state budgets. For context: just the potential cost of the proposed 5% minimum SNAP match is the equivalent of average salary costs for about 65K public school teachers nationwide.
June 3, 2025 at 7:19 PM
That means states would almost surely impose significant spending cuts – *both* to health care & food assistance but also by shifting funds from other parts of the budget, such as schools, child care, housing, or infrastructure. bsky.app/profile/wesl...
June 3, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Three: states are not in a position to absorb these major new cuts, either in good times or bad. For one, they have to balance their budgets. And also: their finances are already increasingly strained, a trend that would worsen if the economy tips further toward recession.
June 3, 2025 at 7:19 PM