WasteGuard Innovations
@wasteguard.bsky.social
We’re revolutionizing the construction industry with a cutting-edge material tracking and efficiency app. Our platform leverages real-time monitoring, intelligent cutlist optimization, and predictive analytics to tackle the industry’s 30% waste problem
EPA data has been inaccurate for as long as they've been around, particularly in their published C&D waste statistics which are based on Weight instead of Value, masking the true impact of C&D waste. Here's more on that with proof and citations:
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
October 4, 2025 at 9:33 AM
EPA data has been inaccurate for as long as they've been around, particularly in their published C&D waste statistics which are based on Weight instead of Value, masking the true impact of C&D waste. Here's more on that with proof and citations:
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
Reposted by WasteGuard Innovations
www.energy.gov
July 29, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Reposted by WasteGuard Innovations
Turn those into formal comments to the EPA.
July 30, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Turn those into formal comments to the EPA.
Reposted by WasteGuard Innovations
No surprise at all. Just a read of the Executive Summary shows it to be nothing more than a re-hash of old denier talking points.
"U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays."
Simply untrue.
"U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays."
Simply untrue.
July 29, 2025 at 9:43 PM
No surprise at all. Just a read of the Executive Summary shows it to be nothing more than a re-hash of old denier talking points.
"U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays."
Simply untrue.
"U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays."
Simply untrue.
There is in fact a whole bunch of problems with that summary. Starting from a foundational fallacy. See here for more details :
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
The EPA's figures are wrong...They base all their numbers on WEIGHT, not VALUE.
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
The EPA's figures are wrong...They base all their numbers on WEIGHT, not VALUE.
Laravel
Software to reduce the 30% waste that comes from construction projects.
wasteguardinnovations.com
September 20, 2025 at 5:44 AM
There is in fact a whole bunch of problems with that summary. Starting from a foundational fallacy. See here for more details :
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
The EPA's figures are wrong...They base all their numbers on WEIGHT, not VALUE.
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
The EPA's figures are wrong...They base all their numbers on WEIGHT, not VALUE.
Would love some feedback from you : wasteguardinnovations.com
Laravel
Software to reduce the 30% waste that comes from construction projects.
wasteguardinnovations.com
July 29, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Would love some feedback from you : wasteguardinnovations.com
I have something you would be interested in.
Check this out when you have a second:
wasteguardinnovations.com
Check this out when you have a second:
wasteguardinnovations.com
July 29, 2025 at 10:18 PM
I have something you would be interested in.
Check this out when you have a second:
wasteguardinnovations.com
Check this out when you have a second:
wasteguardinnovations.com
We published a research paper on this subject.
Check out the implicationis that estimating C&D waste has when calculated by VALUE instead of WEIGHT:
wasteguardinnovations.com/blog
Check out the implicationis that estimating C&D waste has when calculated by VALUE instead of WEIGHT:
wasteguardinnovations.com/blog
June 30, 2025 at 2:48 AM
We published a research paper on this subject.
Check out the implicationis that estimating C&D waste has when calculated by VALUE instead of WEIGHT:
wasteguardinnovations.com/blog
Check out the implicationis that estimating C&D waste has when calculated by VALUE instead of WEIGHT:
wasteguardinnovations.com/blog
I would be careful about citing C&D waste estimates from the EPA. The major reason is that their figures are based on weight, not value. We've published a whitepaper on this topic: Concrete is 90% of the weight, NOT value! The real value lies in the other 10%!
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
June 26, 2025 at 8:23 AM
I would be careful about citing C&D waste estimates from the EPA. The major reason is that their figures are based on weight, not value. We've published a whitepaper on this topic: Concrete is 90% of the weight, NOT value! The real value lies in the other 10%!
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
As it turns out, EPA estimates C&D waste based on weight, not value. We can draw from this the conclusion that concrete makes up the most of the value lost because we throw it away (90%, per the EPA), when in reality its the other 10% (steel, copper, wood, etc).
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
June 26, 2025 at 8:07 AM
As it turns out, EPA estimates C&D waste based on weight, not value. We can draw from this the conclusion that concrete makes up the most of the value lost because we throw it away (90%, per the EPA), when in reality its the other 10% (steel, copper, wood, etc).
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper
wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper