Stop waiting for permission. Stop waiting for the "right time." Your anger is your qualification. Your pain is your power.

The question isn't "Who will lead us?"
The question is: "When will you realize that leader is you?"

Look at every major movement in history. They weren't led by people who asked politely. They were led by people who channeled collective rage into unstoppable action.

The leader we need is probably reading this right now, feeling that burn in their gut, thinking "someone should do something."

We don't need another polished politician telling us to "vote harder." We need someone who's lived the struggle. Someone whose anger isn't manufactured for polls - it's born from watching their community suffer while others play politics.

While we're all keeping score and trading betrayals, guess who's winning? The ones who want us all gone.

DO SOMETHING! Enough passive tweets while democracy burns. Our inspectors general are being purged in the dead of night and Democratic leadership responds with...more tweets? Stand up. Show up. Call emergency pressers. Rally colleagues. The time for action is NOW.

We must recognize this historical echo for what it is: a deliberate strategy to erode democratic norms through media manipulation. The question isn't whether history is repeating—it's whether we'll learn from it this time.

The endgame remains consistent: shifting the boundaries of acceptable discourse until the unthinkable becomes debatable.

This isn't coincidental—it's calculated. When media outlets cover these proposals, they're forced into an impossible choice: ignore dangerous ideas and risk their normalization, or cover them and risk amplifying their reach.

Each outrageous statement—whether about purchasing Greenland or stripping established rights—serves a dual purpose: normalizing radical ideas while undermining the credibility of those reporting on them.

Consider the pattern: Extreme proposals are introduced not as serious policy, but as provocations designed to force media coverage.

Today's attempts to question Native American citizenship rights and dismantle equal employment protections mirror this historical playbook with disturbing precision.