banner
vlo225.bsky.social
@vlo225.bsky.social
LCS deployment chart
November 21, 2025 at 7:37 PM
F-35 program chart
November 21, 2025 at 7:36 PM
US RCPFH 2024 vs 2025
November 21, 2025 at 7:35 PM
The upgraded versions does but good luck making a USN specific version . Lastly we have some other competitors like MEKO and South Korean FFX all great but same problem integration of USN equipment and technical requirements
June 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Next up Mogami , people often say they are cheap ..which is true but they aren't produced in US yards which would really drive up the price . Apart from the design changes required for radar and internals i don't think og Mogami evens passes the FFGX requirement of 16 vls min
June 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Coming to next bit ,above were the FFGX competitors let's look at some of the other ships that are talked about.
Type 26 derivative - Basically CSC 2.0 given delays + adjustments in that program we would get a similar internet reaction
June 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Is exactly new but for ASW duties the latter is much better.
Next come we have Modded LCS's
I don't think I need to ramble why they would have been a suboptimal choice . Between having less vls , being derived from not so optimal FFG design you get the point
June 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
F-100
Very nice ship , has more cells and already equipped with USN standard equipment would have been produced in BiW iirc so much less workforce related delay probably too . But the fundamental problem as i understand is it's a AAW design and bit old one that not saying FREMM
June 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
(copy pasting my rant)I have come to conclusion most people have no idea what's going with the FFG program. First getting the basics out of the way , modifications are necessary you can't expect a USN ship to be operating on Italian equipment like USN have different radars , VLS , missiles etc (1/n)
June 14, 2025 at 9:20 PM
CEC Antenna evolution (16/n)
December 14, 2024 at 8:02 PM
This also goes for TBM interception . What was once a concept can now be done in reality (15/n)
December 14, 2024 at 8:02 PM
Over time USN has further enhanced CEC , by integrating more ships/planes and programs such as Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air (NIFC-CA) which itself was built Forward Pass to extend the battle space (14/n)
December 14, 2024 at 8:01 PM
In 2001 CEC faced its biggest test OPEVAL and TECHEVAL. It had 18 days of at-sea testing with 10 warships, 198 dedicated aircraft sorties, 43 drone presentations, and 29 missile firings and CEC excelled in every scenario . Notable this test was the one with the Big Crow aircraft (13/n)
December 14, 2024 at 8:00 PM
Post this USS Dwight D. Eisenhower battlegroup
par­ticipated in a series of Joint Task Force-95 (JTF-95) exercises to further test out CEC.Such as cueing and composite tracking of a TBM target , CEC data was made available to Army Patriot and USMC Hawk Radars. (12/n)
December 14, 2024 at 8:00 PM
In June 1994, a CEC-equipped battle group tested its capabilities at the AFWTF(Atlantic Fleet Weapons Test Facility). Sea-skimming drones and ECM aircraft simulated complex threats. The group practiced networked air defense under severe electronic countermeasures. (11/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:59 PM
Early testing and integration into units (10/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:58 PM
The CEC system was also integrated into CMS of CVN and Amphibs to provide better protection , along the Aegis DDGs (9/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:57 PM
The Data Distribution System (DDS) is CEC’s high-speed data link, transferring radar and sensor data with unmatched reliability.Using phasedarray antennas, it ensures real time,jam-resistant communication across units, enabling seamless coordination even over miles of separation.(8/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:56 PM
At the heart of CEC are two key components:
1)Cooperative Engagement Processor (CEP)
2)Data Distribution System
(DDS). (6/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:55 PM
3.Coordinated,Cooperative Engagements-CEC enables engagement on remote data, where a missile can intercept a target using radar data from another unit, even if the firing unit never detects it. With SM-2 missiles, this supports midcourse guidance and terminal homing.(5/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:55 PM
2.Precision Cueing-CEC maximizes sensor coverage with special acquisition cueing.If a unit lacks a local track, it cues its radar to start tracking based on precise remote data. This allows quick target acquisition, even during maneuvers,using radar sweeps and precision alignment (4/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:54 PM
Types of Operation
1.Composite Trackingradar data from all units are fused into composite tracks,weighted by sensor accuracy. If one radar fails,the track continues w others. It integrates IFF inputs,ensures consistent track numbers,and uses a shared info to classify targets (3/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:54 PM
The goal was simple fuse allied forces' unique vantage points and coordinate 20-30 missile launchers + aircraft interceptors. The system had to create an identical, high-quality picture usable as local data for engagements even if sourced from 30-40 miles away.(2/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:53 PM
THREAD🧵Cooperative Engagement Capability ( CEC) In the Post Cold War 1990's USN found itself performing many littoral missions that it wasn't best suited for , Aegis had revolutionized USN air dense but as always improvements are always necessary (1/n)
December 14, 2024 at 7:52 PM
Fairchild Republic (the winner which became the A-10)
(8/8)
December 10, 2024 at 8:14 PM