Do real stakes/incentives matter in experiments? Recent studies say they don’t. My new paper shows that these studies’ results — and those of most hypothetical bias experiments — are uninformative when we care about treatment effects. 1/19
#EconSky #PsychSky #PoliSky
🔗: papers.tinbergen.nl/24070.pdf

I'm pleased that WHU Knowledge just featured a short piece on my recent study in Contemporary Accounting Research. It reveals that it is more challenging for people to relinquish control than take it. Big thank you to two anonymous reviewers and the Editor, Khim Kelly. www.whu.edu/en/research/...

Pre-registration, transparency, and large samples boost behavioral studies’ replication rate from 50% to nearly 90% doi.org/10.1038/s415...

Ready to read the paper of the year! @tmartens.bsky.social

On the importance of theoretical understanding of research design and results interpretation 👇🏻

royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/...

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

And, a bit closer to my field 👇🏻

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

A checklist for difference-in-differences practitioners www.jonathandroth.com/assets/files... from Roth, Sant’Anna, Bilinski, & Poe

(Section 6 includes discussion of triple differences, changes-in-changes, and more.)

If you are examining research questions in the area of #disclosure, #information #sharing, and #secrecy (DISS), go and check out our next online workshop at www.diss-conference.com