In 1971, the alleged crisis in science was put in a historical perspective. I find it interesting how long and repetitive the discourse has been.

(To be sure, I am not saying science(s) are in no trouble, I leave that to wiser people to discuss.)

"Shut the eyes of the dead
Not to embarrass anyone
But farewell, Angelina
The sky is embarrassed
And I must be gone" - Bob Dylan

Summer holiday saved! Something to do and review. One more book coming to perfect the Holiday!

My background is in philosophy, and it has been useful in rather different work projects, generally speaking.

Now, in another project, it comes up again

"Our ongoing research program on digital nomadism informs 𝐚 𝐇𝐞𝐠𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐬 and an envisioning of the future(s) of knowledge work."

brill.com/view/journal...

It's a Wonderful Life

Again, the best introduction to counterfactuals is to be watched.

Stipulate that Bailey was not there. What would have happened? - The movie shows this

Never gets old.

Happy holidays!

www.utu.fi/sites/defaul...

Probably the greatest compliment I ever received:
In the book: 'Rethinking Global History'

www.cambridge.org/core/books/r...

It always feels different once printed.

In this work, we analyzed the possible future paths of universities - possible are also desirable or undesirable - by breaking them down into 10 dimensions and 30 possible paths altogether (a taste below).

www.utupub.fi/handle/10024...

This is what I have been cooking this Fall.

Here are my reflections on the topic: blogit.utu.fi/futuresofsci...

Coming out very soon.

History of Knowledge book in Finnish. A long and rewarding work!