Vlad Ayzenberg
@vayzenb.bsky.social
Director of the Vision Learning and Development Lab at Temple University.
Interested in cognition, computation, neuroscience, and development.
https://vlad-lab.com/
Interested in cognition, computation, neuroscience, and development.
https://vlad-lab.com/
Nice result! You might be interested in our perspective paper which also explores this phenomena: doi.org/10.1016/j.ti...
Redirecting
doi.org
November 16, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Nice result! You might be interested in our perspective paper which also explores this phenomena: doi.org/10.1016/j.ti...
I've come around to this way of thinking too
It reminds me of the animal cognition debates where people would move the goal post for intelligence once an animal passed some task
By contrast, people are more than happy to ascribe sophisticated capacities to babies on the basis of looking time
It reminds me of the animal cognition debates where people would move the goal post for intelligence once an animal passed some task
By contrast, people are more than happy to ascribe sophisticated capacities to babies on the basis of looking time
November 6, 2025 at 10:15 PM
I've come around to this way of thinking too
It reminds me of the animal cognition debates where people would move the goal post for intelligence once an animal passed some task
By contrast, people are more than happy to ascribe sophisticated capacities to babies on the basis of looking time
It reminds me of the animal cognition debates where people would move the goal post for intelligence once an animal passed some task
By contrast, people are more than happy to ascribe sophisticated capacities to babies on the basis of looking time
Reposted by Vlad Ayzenberg
So what explains the rest of the variance? If it's not genes, it must be environment, right?
a cat is laying down on a table with the words `` no '' written on its face .
ALT: a cat is laying down on a table with the words `` no '' written on its face .
media.tenor.com
October 16, 2025 at 6:16 PM
So what explains the rest of the variance? If it's not genes, it must be environment, right?