DOD 5000.01 Inquistor
various-failures.bsky.social
DOD 5000.01 Inquistor
@various-failures.bsky.social
Hah that’s pretty good!
December 23, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Also… better question who is the lucky DRPM for this?
December 22, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Yep
December 22, 2025 at 11:50 PM
They were cooked when Franchetti was fired and no one did shit to protest
December 22, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Wonder how this comports with the Acq reform bootcamp that we had to sit through where it was go commercial, go drone, and VC will pick up the tab… JUST WATCH!
December 22, 2025 at 11:30 PM
They have a food court in the pentagon.
December 18, 2025 at 10:54 PM
I am pretty sure the person that signed off on the decision was a career SES comptroller type, and legal counsel, after the political said make it so. Sure a GS14 BFM hit the go button in the ERP, but this is so out of the ordinary I wouldn’t expect a GS to fight this in any meaningful way
December 18, 2025 at 10:57 AM
It’s a purity test in the pentagon. I think of it like the inglorious bastards scene with the number three.

I will continue to refer to as the DoD
December 17, 2025 at 11:35 PM
It’s a backhanded compliment, and to let her know he knows what she said.
December 16, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Reading the article and context it doesn’t come across as someone that is going to resign.
December 16, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Big issue is you still have to qualify parts so if it isn’t AM printed in the first that’s an issue. Additionally, tolerances vary with machines and types and translating between different PLMs/CAD programs that introduces other issues so there is a significant tail with that as well
December 15, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Sure, the heads are political appointees but that is even worse because they know even less than the officers.
December 11, 2025 at 9:33 PM
They never point to the fact that we keep putting the same people in charge of acquisition: military officers.

97% of acquisition is nuts and bolts management of bureaucracy, budgets, and contracts they are not trained very well for, have limited experience, and not a lot of interest.
December 11, 2025 at 9:32 PM
It’s a valid point on broader tech data issues or getting repair requirements up front. More unsexy sustainment side that no program manager willingly wants to talk about, and no product support manager is empowered to change
December 10, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Nothing precludes the government from reverse engineering parts, and it is not something that is beholden to IP law in terms of legal liability

Issue with a lot of this is things that are not manufactured via additive manufacturing still require qualification
December 10, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Is this AI???
December 9, 2025 at 8:59 PM
An additional consumer of top level information to pontificate and talk in abstraction, with a stew of buzzwords used in new and strange ways, is required to acquire capability
December 5, 2025 at 3:17 PM
I think this was a shrewd move on trumps part. It’s is just going to drive massive amounts of angst within the D party. @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social walked right into the trap. Granted, an indictment /= guilt. I am not defending DJT but it’s a flash of political instinct that is unmatched
December 3, 2025 at 8:28 PM
I’m just here for the Palace of the Dead.
December 2, 2025 at 1:53 AM
If you look at it through the view that they don’t actually care if people are getting a good product or the taxpayer isn’t being ripped off it makes sense.

There is also a prevailing sentiment that somehow industry has it figured out and gov folks are morons
December 1, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Aight unc, bedtime.
November 27, 2025 at 3:56 AM
I feel like we are confusing some terminology here about vitals and tests and bloodwork.

What do you mean by vitals?
November 27, 2025 at 3:46 AM