Ty
@ty-the-math-guy.bsky.social
Current Fixation- Statistical Mechanics
Let me know if you're familiar with the Ising model and feel like having an amateur ask you about it! Or have some recommendations on good resources!
Let me know if you're familiar with the Ising model and feel like having an amateur ask you about it! Or have some recommendations on good resources!
So true! We don't want them to get chaffed while fucking us, they might get angry! Best to just lube up, bend over, and be grateful it's not worse.
July 18, 2025 at 3:22 AM
So true! We don't want them to get chaffed while fucking us, they might get angry! Best to just lube up, bend over, and be grateful it's not worse.
It's hard out there. Nearly all of my buddies and I eventually found either data science or community college instructor jobs. I worked construction and as a substitute teacher for a couple years before getting lucky but it worked out in the end. Good luck out there and keep looking!
July 4, 2025 at 6:07 AM
It's hard out there. Nearly all of my buddies and I eventually found either data science or community college instructor jobs. I worked construction and as a substitute teacher for a couple years before getting lucky but it worked out in the end. Good luck out there and keep looking!
Broken clock and whatnot
June 24, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Broken clock and whatnot
For real, the number is probably much higher. I'm sure there's plenty of dead orcs still unaccounted for.
March 2, 2025 at 4:40 PM
For real, the number is probably much higher. I'm sure there's plenty of dead orcs still unaccounted for.
Reposted by Ty
We won't learn a damn thing until we feel the consequences of our actions. For the sake of America, make it hurt.
February 3, 2025 at 6:49 PM
We won't learn a damn thing until we feel the consequences of our actions. For the sake of America, make it hurt.
For only $299.99, or if you act now only 12 easy payments of $45.00. You, yes you, can have first publishing rights. You will get exclusive access to the full proof! Are you ready to go down in history as the GREATEST MATHEMATICIAN OF ALL TIME!? Act now while supply lasts!
January 29, 2025 at 7:45 AM
For only $299.99, or if you act now only 12 easy payments of $45.00. You, yes you, can have first publishing rights. You will get exclusive access to the full proof! Are you ready to go down in history as the GREATEST MATHEMATICIAN OF ALL TIME!? Act now while supply lasts!
Also, of course we need more women in the male dominated space of pop-physicists.
January 21, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Also, of course we need more women in the male dominated space of pop-physicists.
Feels like we need to foster, for a lack of a better word, intellectual arrogance in women. Coming from a math/physics background, it feels like the women who did best were those who had healthy dose of "I got this, no problem". And once you have that, motivation to follow through is far easier.
January 21, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Feels like we need to foster, for a lack of a better word, intellectual arrogance in women. Coming from a math/physics background, it feels like the women who did best were those who had healthy dose of "I got this, no problem". And once you have that, motivation to follow through is far easier.
I wish! He was actually just elected again!
January 20, 2025 at 11:04 PM
I wish! He was actually just elected again!
For real! Can't believe he's out president again!
January 20, 2025 at 11:02 PM
For real! Can't believe he's out president again!
It depends if both nearly identical photons are already there. Or if we are sort of "switching one out for another".
January 19, 2025 at 10:19 PM
It depends if both nearly identical photons are already there. Or if we are sort of "switching one out for another".
Thinking more on it, I think photons wouldn't need that additional data.
January 19, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Thinking more on it, I think photons wouldn't need that additional data.
That would be sufficient for most things. Like another commenter alluded to, that'd be insufficient for bosons as they can occupy the same location so you'd want velocity data as well in that case(then they'd be totally indistinguishable).
January 19, 2025 at 8:45 PM
That would be sufficient for most things. Like another commenter alluded to, that'd be insufficient for bosons as they can occupy the same location so you'd want velocity data as well in that case(then they'd be totally indistinguishable).
What do we mean by property? We can have two separate electrons with all of their intrinsic properties identical. However their location and velocity could mean they have distinct physical consequences. So I think one should require identical extrinsic properties as well.
January 19, 2025 at 7:46 PM
What do we mean by property? We can have two separate electrons with all of their intrinsic properties identical. However their location and velocity could mean they have distinct physical consequences. So I think one should require identical extrinsic properties as well.
Super neat! Definitely looking further into this!
January 16, 2025 at 7:26 AM
Super neat! Definitely looking further into this!
Exactly, and it's mostly just a consequence of humans being hard to science about. It's just layers of emergent phenomena that don't lend themselves to reductive analysis in the same way that many of the natural sciences do.
January 5, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Exactly, and it's mostly just a consequence of humans being hard to science about. It's just layers of emergent phenomena that don't lend themselves to reductive analysis in the same way that many of the natural sciences do.