You can take that disingenuous claptrap and shove it up your ass, actually

Nah, you eat my whole ass, actually, you are worth less than zero of my time after this point, dipshit

You have presented no decent arguments and keep lobbing smears and insults, it is downright comical you have deluded yourself toward thinking you deserve anything other than being ignored at best

They 1000% did not read even the summary that closely

Are you aware you're a big fan of a genocide denier, Mx. Chomsky-glazer?

There's like five other people saying the same shit, and one of them already had dozens of likes way before this one chimed in

No, not really, he's just saying your Manichaean framing is disingenuous at best and deeply dumb at worst. In fact, your own posts deny and downplay the deep history and legal tradition of home-grown anti-semitism and racism in Germany, a point for which there are myriad sources.

He did not say that and I think the larger thing you should be lectured on is the depths of depravity you're willing to sink to just to score a dunk online, including lying

You keep posting this over and over as if it were a slam dunk and all it's letting me know is that a) you didn't read past the summary and b) you don't actually understand this discussion

I think people should read broadly without deluding themselves into thinking they're experts or flattening important critical nuances, and that in that sense a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing

But that's not what is happening, is the thing

If you need it spelled out, deeper issues than historical disagreement are at play

Like some things probably shouldn’t break academic containment maybe because idiots are just going to let it second option bias them into believing something way more inaccurate than the Disney version of history, which is at least mostly accurate, just not detailed.

"Without exploiting workers"

You're arguing out of both sides of your mouth: is the service essential and therefore it should be super cheap or is it an unfair exploitation of workers that should probably cost more? 'Cause this "a few people have all that money" thing is innumerate BS.

"People used to eat out 24/7 and it not break the bank!"

And Charlie Brown? He had hoes, for sure

Stock buybacks do not show up on gross profit *or* on net income because they are not recorded as an expense, you arrogant, blithering fool