Wrong, thanks for playing tho.
The correct answer is Calacanis.
The correct answer is Calacanis.
February 18, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Wrong, thanks for playing tho.
The correct answer is Calacanis.
The correct answer is Calacanis.
Reposted by M
One person talked about how - more than the likely loss of her job- what grieved her was how impossible it will be to restore the sense that public service matters even after Trump moves on. Another told me that Republicans confirmed Russ Vought, who promised to put these employees “in trauma”
February 7, 2025 at 1:37 AM
One person talked about how - more than the likely loss of her job- what grieved her was how impossible it will be to restore the sense that public service matters even after Trump moves on. Another told me that Republicans confirmed Russ Vought, who promised to put these employees “in trauma”
Or... have some humanity and do something to mitigate the harm inflicted on them, as if we were decent fucking human beings rather than monsters having harmed them then also exploiting them for personal political motivations?
Just spitballing. Things are gonna suck, we should be good people anyway
Just spitballing. Things are gonna suck, we should be good people anyway
February 6, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Or... have some humanity and do something to mitigate the harm inflicted on them, as if we were decent fucking human beings rather than monsters having harmed them then also exploiting them for personal political motivations?
Just spitballing. Things are gonna suck, we should be good people anyway
Just spitballing. Things are gonna suck, we should be good people anyway
Can't buy or fake or bully a certain kind of power, you just have it or you don't. Probably what irritates them fundamentally. That and their distain for competence.
January 29, 2025 at 2:51 AM
Can't buy or fake or bully a certain kind of power, you just have it or you don't. Probably what irritates them fundamentally. That and their distain for competence.
Last sentence good, first is not the sentence of a fighter.
The IG response was better - "lol no, see you in court"
Consistency is important, and sounding resigned to fate then claiming you will fight in the same paragraph is kinda weird.
The IG response was better - "lol no, see you in court"
Consistency is important, and sounding resigned to fate then claiming you will fight in the same paragraph is kinda weird.
January 28, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Last sentence good, first is not the sentence of a fighter.
The IG response was better - "lol no, see you in court"
Consistency is important, and sounding resigned to fate then claiming you will fight in the same paragraph is kinda weird.
The IG response was better - "lol no, see you in court"
Consistency is important, and sounding resigned to fate then claiming you will fight in the same paragraph is kinda weird.
Why would she put this out if fighting? It feels like there's a lot of acceptance going on. And few lights like the IG saying "lol no, that's not legal"
January 28, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Why would she put this out if fighting? It feels like there's a lot of acceptance going on. And few lights like the IG saying "lol no, that's not legal"
"despite my gastritis" ...this dude fucks
January 26, 2025 at 10:23 PM
"despite my gastritis" ...this dude fucks
This seems like the proper mechanism: x.com/rogertansey/...
x.com
x.com
January 26, 2025 at 12:49 AM
This seems like the proper mechanism: x.com/rogertansey/...
I think he's misreading the association.
Trump has removed the veil. Rules don't matter if you don't follow them, and the executive enforces the rules, so if they choose to violate and not enforce rules... What mechanism is going to hold them accountable?
The immunity ruling was demonstrative.
Trump has removed the veil. Rules don't matter if you don't follow them, and the executive enforces the rules, so if they choose to violate and not enforce rules... What mechanism is going to hold them accountable?
The immunity ruling was demonstrative.
January 25, 2025 at 1:52 PM
I think he's misreading the association.
Trump has removed the veil. Rules don't matter if you don't follow them, and the executive enforces the rules, so if they choose to violate and not enforce rules... What mechanism is going to hold them accountable?
The immunity ruling was demonstrative.
Trump has removed the veil. Rules don't matter if you don't follow them, and the executive enforces the rules, so if they choose to violate and not enforce rules... What mechanism is going to hold them accountable?
The immunity ruling was demonstrative.
What's the mechanism? Has one already failed, in that departments are following illegal orders before saying, hey maybe let's run this one by the lawyers?
Seems like everything runs on norms, rather than legislation, and it's going just great.
I don't love the part where democrats play possum tho.
Seems like everything runs on norms, rather than legislation, and it's going just great.
I don't love the part where democrats play possum tho.
January 25, 2025 at 4:24 AM
What's the mechanism? Has one already failed, in that departments are following illegal orders before saying, hey maybe let's run this one by the lawyers?
Seems like everything runs on norms, rather than legislation, and it's going just great.
I don't love the part where democrats play possum tho.
Seems like everything runs on norms, rather than legislation, and it's going just great.
I don't love the part where democrats play possum tho.
People with cancer are having their treatment halted due to the NIH EO. We all are not going to make it, and that's intentional.
January 25, 2025 at 3:54 AM
People with cancer are having their treatment halted due to the NIH EO. We all are not going to make it, and that's intentional.
Continuing a career of success dehumanizing non-white children, he next aims to achieve peace in the middle east. Which he describes with words like "glass" and "white settlers" and talk of "affordable housing".
January 24, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Continuing a career of success dehumanizing non-white children, he next aims to achieve peace in the middle east. Which he describes with words like "glass" and "white settlers" and talk of "affordable housing".
This is inarguably true, as it confirms all my priors.
January 23, 2025 at 9:58 PM
This is inarguably true, as it confirms all my priors.
What we don't want to do is mix the two together in some kind of weird bastardization. Not helpful.
January 23, 2025 at 8:52 PM
What we don't want to do is mix the two together in some kind of weird bastardization. Not helpful.
Perhaps they think it's snarky and feisty, gives them a hit of dopamine.
I don't like it. Not impressed. Don't see how it serves the goals, and it muddies what the values are.
If someone is doing something that sucks, say it sucks. If you have better ideas, present your ideas.
I don't like it. Not impressed. Don't see how it serves the goals, and it muddies what the values are.
If someone is doing something that sucks, say it sucks. If you have better ideas, present your ideas.
January 23, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Perhaps they think it's snarky and feisty, gives them a hit of dopamine.
I don't like it. Not impressed. Don't see how it serves the goals, and it muddies what the values are.
If someone is doing something that sucks, say it sucks. If you have better ideas, present your ideas.
I don't like it. Not impressed. Don't see how it serves the goals, and it muddies what the values are.
If someone is doing something that sucks, say it sucks. If you have better ideas, present your ideas.
Amazing lack of self awareness... The country just voted for fascism because the press failed american values.
That guy hasn't done the math
That guy hasn't done the math
January 23, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Amazing lack of self awareness... The country just voted for fascism because the press failed american values.
That guy hasn't done the math
That guy hasn't done the math
Reposted by M
By the way, this is actual news: this is Trump's "DEI" czar admitting that his actual project is to undo the 1960s civil rights laws.
January 23, 2025 at 2:03 AM
By the way, this is actual news: this is Trump's "DEI" czar admitting that his actual project is to undo the 1960s civil rights laws.
Why do they always put us in the position to try to sus out if it's painfully naive, willful ignorance, just dumb or actual malice?
January 21, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Why do they always put us in the position to try to sus out if it's painfully naive, willful ignorance, just dumb or actual malice?
That's what it would take for me to support Trump, except it has to be the sun.
Fire musk into the sun, and you might win my vote, in whatever imaginary future exists where we vote and it matters.
Fire musk into the sun, and you might win my vote, in whatever imaginary future exists where we vote and it matters.
January 20, 2025 at 8:45 PM
That's what it would take for me to support Trump, except it has to be the sun.
Fire musk into the sun, and you might win my vote, in whatever imaginary future exists where we vote and it matters.
Fire musk into the sun, and you might win my vote, in whatever imaginary future exists where we vote and it matters.