Tom Slade
@tslade.bsky.social
Appellate lawyer at Supreme Advocacy LLP. Supreme Court of Canada predictions at Fantasy Courts.
Reposted by Tom Slade
“When reckoning with this caselaw, defendants vague out” is a great line.
![The claims here are instead like others challenging the executive's power to impose government-wide personnel policy, not "any [one] personnel action," claims which have remained in district court. E.g., Feds for Med.
Freedom v. Biden, 63 F.4th 366, 369 (5th Cir.) (en banc), vacated as moot, 144 S. Ct. 480. When reckoning with this case law, defendants vague out. The do not attempt to show how the facts of this case compare with the first string of cases, instead merely saying that plaintiffs never "distinguish the facts of their case" from those of Fausto, Elgin, or Veit (Defs.' TRO Opp. 14). Plaintiffs plainly did, and do so again](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2vtbmhmrwzbqcfv4we4uxzzt/bafkreiepotbpazmv34tcywsk5is3bo7cowppa2jjcj2vjsyi3lfytgo2tq@jpeg)
March 25, 2025 at 11:46 AM
“When reckoning with this caselaw, defendants vague out” is a great line.
Yes we'll be on here shortly!
March 8, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Yes we'll be on here shortly!