Devops witch / kusoge fan. Staff for multiple "bad" game appreciation events. Does weird stuff with WebRTC and RTMP. Might tech your marathon. RPG streamer and sometimes speedrunner
I'm flummoxed at this, frankly.
I'm flummoxed at this, frankly.
If you argue, you're rocking the boat.
It's a sign of severe rot yes.
If you argue, you're rocking the boat.
It's a sign of severe rot yes.
Just say you screwed up.
Just say you screwed up.
They're not my stories to tell but I'm sure AF gonna boost them if they tell them in public.
Meanwhile, this makes no sense even on a TO level
They're not my stories to tell but I'm sure AF gonna boost them if they tell them in public.
Meanwhile, this makes no sense even on a TO level
Talk about missing the point of being tournament/ladder leadership.
Talk about missing the point of being tournament/ladder leadership.
It's not about PUNISHING people, it's about fixing the fuckup.
It's not about PUNISHING people, it's about fixing the fuckup.
Boy I lost that gamble didn't I?
Boy I lost that gamble didn't I?
Policy is clear that the event should be invalidated once people were barred from participating unjustly.
What they're doing this Extra Work for speaks volumes.
Policy is clear that the event should be invalidated once people were barred from participating unjustly.
What they're doing this Extra Work for speaks volumes.
Like WTF. This is a categorical management failure.
Like WTF. This is a categorical management failure.
Being a coward using policy as a shield would have worked!
Why are y'all Doing The Hard Thing when it's blowing your foot off? This was easy!
Being a coward using policy as a shield would have worked!
Why are y'all Doing The Hard Thing when it's blowing your foot off? This was easy!
It's the biggest unforced error I've ever seen.
It's the biggest unforced error I've ever seen.
That's the "rot" part to me.
That's the "rot" part to me.
People left without scoring over this. IFPA's own rules say if this happens the event is invalid. The correct answer is obvious.
People left without scoring over this. IFPA's own rules say if this happens the event is invalid. The correct answer is obvious.
We'd get incoherent BS like "There is a violation on <domain>" and when we'd say "No, you need to be specific where and what the violation is", get back threats of legal escalation.
We'd get incoherent BS like "There is a violation on <domain>" and when we'd say "No, you need to be specific where and what the violation is", get back threats of legal escalation.