What exactly would disapproval do other than make a couple people feel better without changing anything?
What exactly would disapproval do other than make a couple people feel better without changing anything?
You don't actually have to internalize marketing, especially when it's trying to be intentionally insulting/elitist.
You don't actually have to internalize marketing, especially when it's trying to be intentionally insulting/elitist.
Dems seem to notice that the media holds Republicans to a different standard. See, eg, the NYT had a good amount of these emails when they published the "but her emails" crap. See also, the Major Questions Doctrine applies to Biden but the Unitary Executive applies to Trump.
Dems seem to notice that the media holds Republicans to a different standard. See, eg, the NYT had a good amount of these emails when they published the "but her emails" crap. See also, the Major Questions Doctrine applies to Biden but the Unitary Executive applies to Trump.
If the answer is under 186,000: "Why not more?"
Oh, you mean the list held names of people who had died, not that the service was being abused.
If the answer is under 186,000: "Why not more?"
Oh, you mean the list held names of people who had died, not that the service was being abused.
Really government and the flight for democracy is about whether you can dunk on people who care.
You're so cool!
Imagine if you had decency to have values instead of mockery. Imagine.
But you're soooooo 😎
Really government and the flight for democracy is about whether you can dunk on people who care.
You're so cool!
Imagine if you had decency to have values instead of mockery. Imagine.
But you're soooooo 😎
You absolutely can find shit if you look.
You absolutely can find shit if you look.
So, remember, if you want to be angry at the court that's giving away democracy, get angry at people describing it instead!
So, remember, if you want to be angry at the court that's giving away democracy, get angry at people describing it instead!
Like Chuck, it's a choice and you get the rewards you choose to put effort into.
Like Chuck, it's a choice and you get the rewards you choose to put effort into.
What am I prepared to sacrifice in the fight for regular Constitutional order instead of a march towards authoritarianism? More than a month's pay.
What am I prepared to sacrifice in the fight for regular Constitutional order instead of a march towards authoritarianism? More than a month's pay.
They will rest easier. That's the upside.
They will rest easier. That's the upside.
Republicans have already said that any deal will be done with the expectation that they'll rescind parts of the budget.
Surrender some hostages to free others?
Republicans have already said that any deal will be done with the expectation that they'll rescind parts of the budget.
Surrender some hostages to free others?
What if, and I'm just spitballing here, it was metaphorical. She took care of San Francisco like a woman-coded parent ... you know, a mom.
What if, and I'm just spitballing here, it was metaphorical. She took care of San Francisco like a woman-coded parent ... you know, a mom.
Those conference call days are also how we got a toilet flush during oral arguments.
Those conference call days are also how we got a toilet flush during oral arguments.
Politicians are crazy, but we need decision makers that lead. That's a very ego driven personality.
We also need fighters who push.
I absolutely subscribe to the idea that there's things that can be disqualifing, but absent those things policy results matter & personality not.
Politicians are crazy, but we need decision makers that lead. That's a very ego driven personality.
We also need fighters who push.
I absolutely subscribe to the idea that there's things that can be disqualifing, but absent those things policy results matter & personality not.
And you're wrong.
And you're wrong.
"Well technically" is never a winning political argument, as far as I can tell. If no one knows you're doing good ... that's not good politics.
But again, that's not their fault, right? That's the voters fault.
"Well technically" is never a winning political argument, as far as I can tell. If no one knows you're doing good ... that's not good politics.
But again, that's not their fault, right? That's the voters fault.
If they do X and deny it ... how is that different from doing X and admitting it?
If they do X and deny it ... how is that different from doing X and admitting it?