Squidgy
@trainersquidgy.com
Strong Pokémon. Weak Pokémon. That is only the selfish perception of people. Truly skilled Trainers should try to win with the Pokémon they love best.
https://youtube.com/Squidgy
https://youtube.com/Squidgy
Steel would be brilliant for inverse battles in Gen 2 if Gen 2 Steel types held up well in a solo format! Even Scizor, which is the best of those, is outclassed by its pre-evo!
Out of all them, Ice is the most fun I've had - it's strange seeing an offensive powerhouse type become VERY defensive.
Out of all them, Ice is the most fun I've had - it's strange seeing an offensive powerhouse type become VERY defensive.
September 15, 2025 at 9:47 AM
Steel would be brilliant for inverse battles in Gen 2 if Gen 2 Steel types held up well in a solo format! Even Scizor, which is the best of those, is outclassed by its pre-evo!
Out of all them, Ice is the most fun I've had - it's strange seeing an offensive powerhouse type become VERY defensive.
Out of all them, Ice is the most fun I've had - it's strange seeing an offensive powerhouse type become VERY defensive.
I'm in the same situation with Crystal - I've had inverse battles coded in for about a year, but when I've piloted the concept, it falls flat.
I don't think it's an issue with the idea, though. I reckon if you frame it correctly and with the right Pokémon, it could work very well.
I don't think it's an issue with the idea, though. I reckon if you frame it correctly and with the right Pokémon, it could work very well.
September 14, 2025 at 10:44 PM
I'm in the same situation with Crystal - I've had inverse battles coded in for about a year, but when I've piloted the concept, it falls flat.
I don't think it's an issue with the idea, though. I reckon if you frame it correctly and with the right Pokémon, it could work very well.
I don't think it's an issue with the idea, though. I reckon if you frame it correctly and with the right Pokémon, it could work very well.